IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wfo/wblltn/y2015i15p166-179.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Family Benefits and Family Policy in Selected European Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Margit Schratzenstaller

Abstract

Family policies vary considerably, in their focus as much as in the instruments used, in Germany, France, the Netherlands, Sweden and Denmark, the countries selected for the analysis. Germany's traditional type of family policy was fundamentally rehauled in recent years in order to boost female employment and improve options to reconcile job and family. France pursues a pronatalist policy that aims to increase female employment as well as fertility rates. Family policy in the Netherlands promotes a secondary-earner model. In Sweden, the focus of family policy is on facilitating female employment by child-care facilities, on increasing fathers' involvement and on reducing poverty by way of generous money transfers. In Denmark, the emphasis is on encouraging parents to quickly return to work. More recent reforms, especially with regard to parental leave, reflect an intensifying effort to increase fathers' involvement in some countries. Another aspect is the pressure on family benefits exerted by the fiscal consolidation programmes implemented in most EU countries since the early 2010s.

Suggested Citation

  • Margit Schratzenstaller, 2015. "Family Benefits and Family Policy in Selected European Countries," WIFO Bulletin, WIFO, vol. 20(15), pages 166-179, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wfo:wblltn:y:2015:i:15:p:166-179
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.wifo.ac.at/wwa/pubid/58370
    File Function: abstract
    Download Restriction: Payment required
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fabien Dell & Katharina Wrohlich, 2006. "Income Taxation and its Family Components in France," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 4(4), pages 50-54, 02.
    2. Fabien Dell & Katharina Wrohlich, 2006. "Income Taxation and its Family Components in France," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 4(04), pages 50-54, February.
    3. repec:ces:ifodic:v:3:y:2005:i:2:p:14567654 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Margit Schratzenstaller, 2015. "Family Benefits in Austria – An Overview," WIFO Bulletin, WIFO, vol. 20(14), pages 156-165, September.
    5. Richard Ochmann & Katharina Wrohlich, 2013. "Familiensplitting der CDU/CSU: Hohe Kosten bei geringer Entlastung für einkommensschwache Familien," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 80(36), pages 3-11.
    6. Angela Luci, 2011. "Frauen auf dem Arbeitsmarkt in Deutschland und Frankreich. Warum es Französinnen besser gelingt, Familie und Beruf zu vereinbaren," Working Papers hal-01298941, HAL.
    7. Holger Bonin & Anita Fichtl & Helmut Rainer & C. Katharina Spieß & Holger Stichnoth & Katharina Wrohlich, 2013. "Zentrale Resultate der Gesamtevaluation familienbezogener Leistungen," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 80(40), pages 3-13.
    8. Margit Schratzenstaller, 2015. "Familienpolitische Leistungen in Österreich im Überblick," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 88(3), pages 185-194, March.
    9. Jeanne Fagnani, 2005. "Family Policy in France: Old Challenges, New Tensions," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 3(02), pages 40-44, July.
    10. Stefan Bach & Johannes Geyer & Peter Haan & Katharina Wrohlich, 2011. "Reform des Ehegattensplittings: nur eine reine Individualbesteuerung erhöht die Erwerbsanreize deutlich," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 78(41), pages 13-19.
    11. Esping-Andersen, Gosta, 1999. "Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198742005.
    12. Holger Bonin & Anita Fichtl & Helmut Rainer & C. Katharina Spieß & Holger Stichnoth & Katharina Wrohlich & Anita Dietrich, 2013. "Lessons for Family Policy – Central Results of the Ex-Post-Evaluation of Monetary Family Related Benefits in Germany," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 66(18), pages 22-30, October.
    13. Jeanne Fagnani, 2005. "Family Policy in France: Old Challenges, New Tensions," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 3(2), pages 40-44, 07.
    14. repec:ces:ifodic:v:4:y:2006:i:4:p:14567444 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. C. Katharina Spieß, 2012. "Betreuungsgeld widerspricht den Zielen nachhaltiger Familienpolitik: Kommentar," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 79(24), pages 24-24.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Margit Schratzenstaller, 2018. "Long-term Trends of Level and Structure of Family Benefits in Austria," WIFO Bulletin, WIFO, vol. 23(8), pages 62-74, July.
    2. Margit Schratzenstaller, 2015. "Family Benefits in Austria – An Overview," WIFO Bulletin, WIFO, vol. 20(14), pages 156-165, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Margit Schratzenstaller, 2015. "Familienleistungen und familienpolitische Instrumente in ausgewählten europäischen Ländern," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 88(3), pages 195-209, March.
    2. Margit Schratzenstaller, 2014. "Familienpolitik in ausgewählten europäischen Ländern im Vergleich," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 50840, February.
    3. Hermann Buslei & Katharina Wrohlich, 2014. "Besteuerung von Paaren: das Ehegattensplitting und seine Alternativen," DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus 21, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    4. Peter Huber & Thomas Horvath & Klaus Nowotny & Margit Schratzenstaller & Silvia Rocha-Akis & Hedwig Lutz & Christine Mayrhuber, 2021. "Analysen zur rezenten Entwicklungen der Familie in Österreich. Beiträge des WIFO zum 6. Österreichischen Familienbericht 2009-2019," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 67115, February.
    5. Margit Schratzenstaller & Fanny Dellinger, 2017. "Genderdifferenzierte Lenkungswirkungen des Abgabensystems," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 60797, February.
    6. Margit Schratzenstaller, 2016. "Fiscal Policy Facing Major Challenges with Tax Reform, Need for Growth-Enhancing Investment and Consolidation Targets. Federal Fiscal Framework 2016-2019 and Draft Federal Budget 2016," WIFO Bulletin, WIFO, vol. 21(2), pages 12-29, February.
    7. Holger Bonin & Anita Fichtl & Helmut Rainer & C. Katharina Spieß & Holger Stichnoth & Katharina Wrohlich, 2013. "Zentrale Resultate der Gesamtevaluation familienbezogener Leistungen," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 80(40), pages 3-13.
    8. Margit Schratzenstaller, 2015. "The Tax Reform 2015-16 – Measures and Overall Assessment," WIFO Bulletin, WIFO, vol. 20(20), pages 222-237, December.
    9. Kerstin Ruckdeschel, 2012. "Comparing Desired Fertility And Perceptions Of Motherhood In Germany And France," Demográfia English Edition, Hungarian Demographic Research Institute, vol. 55(5), pages 5-36.
    10. Uta Brehm & Henriette Engelhardt, 2015. "On the age-specific correlation between fertility and female employment," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 32(23), pages 691-722.
    11. Suprinovič, Olga & Schneck, Stefan & Kay, Rosemarie, 2015. "Family-related employment interruptions and self-employment of women: Does policy matter?," Working Papers 03/15, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    12. Anna Busse & Christina Gathmann, 2018. "Free Daycare and Its Effects on Children and Their Families," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 958, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    13. Morgan Richards-Melamdir, 2021. "Can Progressive Taxation Address Gender Inequality in Income? Cross-National Evidence of Gender Differences in Income Tax Payment Patterns and Post-Tax Income," LIS Working papers 816, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    14. Mühlenkamp Holger, 2016. "Effizienzmessung und quantitative Instrumente zur Effizienzsteigerung im öffentlichen Sektor," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 17(2), pages 106-128, July.
    15. Margit Schratzenstaller, 2017. "Fiscal Policy Facing Manifold Challenges. Federal Fiscal Framework 2017-2020 and Draft Federal Budget 2017," WIFO Bulletin, WIFO, vol. 22(7), pages 58-72, July.
    16. Busse, Anna & Gathmann, Christina, 2015. "The Effects of Free Childcare on Labor Supply and Children," VfS Annual Conference 2015 (Muenster): Economic Development - Theory and Policy 113078, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    17. Holger Bonin & Anita Fichtl & Helmut Rainer & C. Katharina Spieß & Holger Stichnoth & Katharina Wrohlich & Anita Dietrich, 2013. "Lessons for Family Policy – Central Results of the Ex-Post-Evaluation of Monetary Family Related Benefits in Germany," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 66(18), pages 22-30, October.
    18. Nadja König & Ludger Schuknecht, 2018. "The Role of Government and Trust in the Market Economy," CESifo Working Paper Series 6997, CESifo.
    19. Burkert, Carola & Kosubek, Sylvia & Schaade, Peter, 2014. "Alleinerziehend am Arbeitsmarkt : Situation von Alleinerziehenden in Hessen," IAB-Regional. Berichte und Analysen aus dem Regionalen Forschungsnetz. IAB Hessen 201402, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    20. Egger, Peter H. & Radulescu, Doina M., 2012. "Family policy and the number of children: Evidence from a natural experiment," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 524-539.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wfo:wblltn:y:2015:i:15:p:166-179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Florian Mayr (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wifooat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.