IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/uwp/landec/v77y2001i2p300-313.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Royalty Systems, Government Revenues, and Forest Condition: An Application from Malaysia

Author

Listed:
  • Gregory S. Amacher
  • Richard J. Brazee
  • Meindert Witvliet

Abstract

Royalty structure has been linked to deforestation through non-sustainable harvesting and high grading. Yet royalties are an important rent generation mechanism for governments. In this paper, a dynamic model of government policy choice is used to compare different royalty systems with respect to government revenue generation and high grading. Empirical analyses of the various royalty systems is then undertaken for forest concessions in Malaysia. One unique aspect of our study is an examination of how different royalty systems impact harvesting of highand low-valued timber species, government rent capture, and concessionaire profits. The results should help with future royalty design.

Suggested Citation

  • Gregory S. Amacher & Richard J. Brazee & Meindert Witvliet, 2001. "Royalty Systems, Government Revenues, and Forest Condition: An Application from Malaysia," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 77(2), pages 300-313.
    • Handle: RePEc:uwp:landec:v:77:y:2001:i:2:p:300-313
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://le.uwpress.org/cgi/reprint/77/2/300
    Download Restriction: A subscripton is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. N. Bockstael & J.C. Burgess & I. Strand, 1998. "The linkages between the timber trade and tropical deforestation – Indonesia," Chapters, in: The Economics of Environment and Development, chapter 20, pages 444-475, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Jeffrey R. Vincent, 1990. "Rent Capture and the Feasibility of Tropical Forest Management," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 66(2), pages 212-223.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gregory Amacher & Erkki Koskela & Markku Ollikainen, 2007. "Royalty reform and illegal reporting of harvest volumes under alternative penalty schemes," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 38(2), pages 189-211, October.
    2. Giudice, Renzo & Soares-Filho, Britaldo S. & Merry, Frank & Rodrigues, Hermann O. & Bowman, Maria, 2012. "Timber concessions in Madre de Dios: Are they a good deal?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 158-165.
    3. Christopher Costello & Nicolas Querou & Agnès Tomini, 2014. "Spatial concessions with limited tenure," Post-Print hal-01123392, HAL.
    4. Cornelia Luchsinger & Adrian Müller, 2003. "Incentive Compatible Extraction of Natural Resource Rent," CEPE Working paper series 03-21, CEPE Center for Energy Policy and Economics, ETH Zurich.
    5. Wang, Sen & Bogle, Tim & van Kooten, G. Cornelis, 2012. "Forestry and the New Institutional Economics," Working Papers 130818, University of Victoria, Resource Economics and Policy.
    6. Liu, Shilei & Xia, Jun, 2021. "Forest harvesting restriction and forest restoration in China," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    7. Mumbunan, Sonny & Wahyudi, Riko, 2016. "Revenue loss from legal timber in Indonesia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 115-123.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gregory S. Amacher & Erkki Koskela & Markku Ollikainen, 2004. "Deforestation, Production Intensity and Land Use under Insecure Property Rights," CESifo Working Paper Series 1128, CESifo.
    2. Luiza M Karpavicius & Ariaster Chimeli, 2023. "Forest Protection and Human Health: The Case of Malaria in the Brazilian Amazon," Working Papers, Department of Economics 2023_08, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP), revised 26 Jul 2023.
    3. K. Erdlenbruch & M. Tidball, 2006. "Singular Optimal Control Model of Stock-Dependent Environmental Policies," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 131(1), pages 69-88, October.
    4. Chimeli, Ariaster & Guilhoto, Joaquim & Gatti, Luciana, 2011. "Socio-Economic Drivers of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Brazilian Amazon: New Evidence from Santarem, Para," TD NEREUS 11-2011, Núcleo de Economia Regional e Urbana da Universidade de São Paulo (NEREUS).
    5. Gregory S. Amacher & Erkki Koskela & Markku Ollikainen, 2004. "Socially Optimal Royalty Design and Illegal Logging under Alternative Penalty Schemes," CESifo Working Paper Series 1131, CESifo.
    6. Cubbage, Frederick & Harou, Patrice & Sills, Erin, 2007. "Policy instruments to enhance multi-functional forest management," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(7), pages 833-851, April.
    7. Othman, Jamal, 2003. "Linking Agricultural Trade, Land Demand and Environmental Externalities: Case of Oil Palm in South East Asia," MPRA Paper 22016, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Stefano Pagiola, 2004. "Land Use Change in Indonesia," Others 0405007, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Frank Place & Keijiro Otsuka, 2000. "Population Pressure, Land Tenure, and Tree Resource Management in Uganda," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 76(2), pages 233-251.
    10. Hansen, Christian P. & Lund, Jens F., 2011. "The political economy of timber taxation: The case of Ghana," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(8), pages 630-641, October.
    11. Peter Park & Edward Barbier & Joanne Burgess, 1998. "The Economics of Forest Land Use in Temperate and Tropical Areas," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 11(3), pages 473-487, April.
    12. Thiele, Rainer & Wiebelt, Manfred, 1996. "Tropenwaldmanagement: Ein Balanceakt zwischen Schutz und Raubbau," Kiel Discussion Papers 282, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    13. Christopher Costello & Nicolas Querou & Agnès Tomini, 2014. "Spatial concessions with limited tenure," Post-Print hal-01123392, HAL.
    14. Vincent, Jeffrey R & Gillis, Malcolm, 1998. "Deforestation and Forest Land Use: A Comment," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 13(1), pages 133-140, February.
    15. Karsenty, Alain, 2002. "Le rôle controversé de la fiscalité forestière dans la gestion des forêts tropicales - L’état du débat et les perspectives en Afrique centrale," Cahiers d'Economie et de Sociologie Rurales (CESR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 64.
    16. Henk Folmer & G. Cornelis van Kooten, 2006. "Deforestation," Working Papers 2006-06, University of Victoria, Department of Economics, Resource Economics and Policy Analysis Research Group.
      • Folmer, Henk & van Kooten, G. Cornelis, 2006. "Deforestation," Working Papers 37035, University of Victoria, Resource Economics and Policy.
    17. Alain Karsenty, 2002. "Le rôle controversé de la fiscalité forestière dans la gestion des forêts tropicales - L’état du débat et les perspectives en Afrique centrale," Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurales, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 64, pages 5-36.
    18. Feng’ e Yang & Shashi Kant, 2008. "Rent Capture Analysis of Ontario’s Stumpage System Using an Enhanced Parity Bounds Model," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 84(4), pages 667-688.
    19. Stenberg, Luz Centeno & Siriwardana, Mahinda, 2007. "Forest conservation in the Philippines: An economic assessment of selected policy responses using a computable general equilibrium model," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(6), pages 671-693, February.
    20. Merry, Frank D. & Carter, Douglas R., 2001. "Factors affecting Bolivian mahogany exports with policy implications for the forest sector," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 2(3-4), pages 281-291, July.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • Q23 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Forestry
    • Q28 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uwp:landec:v:77:y:2001:i:2:p:300-313. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://le.uwpress.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.