IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/url/upravl/v11y2020i4p82-96.html

Knowledge management strategies in companies: Trends and the impact of Industry 4.0

Author

Listed:
  • Maksim S. Kolyasnikov

    (Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Ekaterinburg, Russia)

  • Natalya R. Kelchevskaya

    (Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Ekaterinburg, Russia)

Abstract

The existing business models essential for the creation of consumer value and, consequently, business competitiveness are now undergoing a transformation. Brand-new technological developments based on network integration, intelligent technology and flexible automation are becoming increasingly relevant: additional competitive opportunities appear, and knowledge management and intellectual capital management are becoming key business processes. When developing a strategic vision, it is important for companies to pick the relevant data out of the information flow about the external and internal environment and convert it into organizational knowledge, which is a core management resource. The paper analyses the experience of Russian and foreign companies in the introduction of scalable models focused on the widespread use of Industry 4.0 and establishes the principles and strategies of knowledge management that allow these companies to maintain their competitive positions in a strategic perspective. The theory of knowledge management and resource approach constitute the methodological framework of the present study. The general scientific methods of logical-structural analysis and systematization, as well as the contingency case study method were applied. The information base encompasses the case studies of six companies, retrieved from publicly available sources. The findings of the empirical research prove the feasibility of applying a situational approach to knowledge management: companies use different strategies for accumulating and sharing knowledge according to their maturity level and the area of implementation of Industry 4.0. Based on the results obtained, the authors develop a situational approach to the strategic knowledge management of companies that successfully apply the technologies of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. The theoretical and practical significance of the study lies in identifying common approaches to knowledge management under various conditions, which can be used to create the strategic vision of managers involved in the key decision-making process in companies.

Suggested Citation

  • Maksim S. Kolyasnikov & Natalya R. Kelchevskaya, 2020. "Knowledge management strategies in companies: Trends and the impact of Industry 4.0," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 11(4), pages 82-96, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:url:upravl:v:11:y:2020:i:4:p:82-96
    DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2020-11-4-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://upravlenets.usue.ru/images/86/7.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://upravlenets.usue.ru/en/issues-2020/678
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.29141/2218-5003-2020-11-4-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yang, Jie, 2010. "The knowledge management strategy and its effect on firm performance: A contingency analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(2), pages 215-223, June.
    2. David Baxter & Rajkumar Roy & James Gao, 2009. "Managing knowledge within the manufacturing enterprise: an overview," International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 18(2), pages 183-209.
    3. Luiz Antonio Joia, 2007. "Knowledge management strategies: creating and testing a measurement scale," International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(3), pages 203-221.
    4. Jurgita Raudeliūnienė & Vida Davidavičienė & Artūras Jakubavičius, 2018. "Knowledge management process model," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 5(3), pages 542-554, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jun Chen & Asma-Qamaliah Abdul-Hamid & Suhaiza Zailani, 2024. "Blockchain Adoption for a Circular Economy in the Chinese Automotive Industry: Identification of Influencing Factors Using an Integrated TOE-TAM Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-28, December.
    2. Dragana Rošulj & Dejan Č. Petrović & Siniša M. Arsić, 2024. "Knowledge Management in Serbian SMEs: Key Factors of Influence on Internal and External Business Performances," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-21, January.
    3. Przemysław Niewiadomski & Agnieszka Stachowiak, 2024. "Identification of Barriers to Sustainable Manufacturing Implementation—The Perspective of Manufacturers of Parts and Components for Agricultural Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-14, March.
    4. Andrey A. Zaytsev & Roman S. Blizkyi & Irina I. Rakhmeeva & Nikolay D. Dmitriev, 2021. "Building a Model for Financial Management of Digital Technologies in the Areas of Combinatorial Effects," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-15, April.
    5. Borcosi Corina Ana, 2025. "The Trend In Management – Digital Management And How It Is Implemented By National And International Smes," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1, pages 116-121, February.
    6. Tori Reddy DODLA & Laura Ann JONES, 2023. "Identifying knowledge management strategies for knowledge management systems," Access Journal, Access Press Publishing House, vol. 4(2), pages 261-277, March.
    7. Àlena V. Vankevich & Iryna N. Kalinouskaya, 2024. "Digitalisation and jobs: The case of organisations in the Vitebsk area of Belarus," Journal of New Economy, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 25(4), pages 106-126, December.
    8. Muawia Ramadan & Tariq Amer & Bashir Salah & Mohammed Ruzayqat, 2022. "The Impact of Integration of Industry 4.0 and Internal Organizational Forces on Sustaining Competitive Advantages and Achieving Strategic Objectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lucianetti, Lorenzo & Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel Jose & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Latan, Hengky, 2018. "Contingency factors and complementary effects of adopting advanced manufacturing tools and managerial practices: Effects on organizational measurement systems and firms' performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 318-328.
    2. A. E. Rodríguez Salazar & M. A. Domínguez-Crespo & A. M. Torres-Huerta & A. I. Licona-Aguilar & A. Nivón-Pellón & V. N. Orta-Guzmán, 2021. "Analysis of the Dynamical Capabilities into the Public Research Institutes to Their Strategic Decision-Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-22, June.
    3. Ashley S. Otto & David M. Szymanski & Rajan Varadarajan, 2020. "Customer satisfaction and firm performance: insights from over a quarter century of empirical research," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 543-564, May.
    4. Mirna Kordab & Jurgita Raudeliūnienė & Ieva Meidutė-Kavaliauskienė, 2020. "Mediating Role of Knowledge Management in the Relationship between Organizational Learning and Sustainable Organizational Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Ionela Carmen PIRNEA & Elena Alexandra CALDARARU, 2012. "The relationship between performance and knowledge management in Romanian SMEs," Anale. Seria Stiinte Economice. Timisoara, Faculty of Economics, Tibiscus University in Timisoara, vol. 0, pages 512-517, May.
    6. Hsieh, Jung-Kuei & Hsieh, Yi-Ching, 2015. "Dialogic co-creation and service innovation performance in high-tech companies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(11), pages 2266-2271.
    7. Mostofa Wahid Soykoth & Woojong Sim & Sydney Frederick, 2025. "Research trends in market intelligence: a review through a data-driven quantitative approach," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(1), pages 236-262, March.
    8. Bhatti, Waheed Akbar & Larimo, Jorma & Carrasco, Inmaculada, 2016. "Strategy's effect on knowledge sharing in host country networks," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 4769-4774.
    9. Santanu Roy & Jay Mitra, 2015. "Strategic Capabilities for Public Sector-led Innovation: Managing Knowledge Worker Deployment at and Quality Performance of Public R&D Laboratories in India," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 1(2), pages 181-200, July.
    10. Carlos Eduardo Marulanda Echeverry & Jaime Alberto Giraldo Garc�a & H�ctor Mauricio Serna G�mez, 2015. "Modelo de evaluación de gestión del conocimiento para las pymes del sector de tecnologías de la Información," Revista Ad-Minister, Universidad EAFIT.
    11. Zenona Ona Atkočiūnienė & Justas Gribovskis & Jurgita Raudeliūnienė, 2022. "Influence of Knowledge Management on Business Processes: Value-Added and Sustainability Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    12. Korhan Arun & Saniye Yıldirim Ozmutlu, 2025. "Reality or Intention: Diffusion of Sustainability Innovations in Green Supply Chain Applications," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(7), pages 8759-8778, November.
    13. Awe, Olajumoke A. & Woodside, Arch G. & Nerur, Sridhar & Prater, Edmund, 2020. "Capturing heterogeneities in orchestrating resources for accurately forecasting high (separately low) project management performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    14. Tai-Wei Chang & Cheng-Ze Hung, 2021. "How to Shape the Employees’ Organization Sustainable Green Knowledge Sharing: Cross-Level Effect of Green Organizational Identity Effect on Green Management Behavior and Performance of Members," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, January.
    15. Haiyun Yu & Yanjie Shang & Nan Wang & Zhenzhong Ma, 2019. "The Mediating Effect of Decision Quality on Knowledge Management and Firm Performance for Chinese Entrepreneurs: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-15, July.
    16. Deden Sumirat Hidayat & Dana Indra Sensuse, 2022. "Knowledge Management Model for Smart Campus in Indonesia," Data, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-42, January.
    17. da Silva Gonçalves Zangiski, Marlene Aparecida & Pinheiro de Lima, Edson & Gouvea da Costa, Sergio E., 2013. "Organizational competence building and development: Contributions to operations management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 76-89.
    18. Mahmutaj Lura Rexhepi & Krasniqi Besnik, 2020. "Innovation Types and Sales Growth in Small Firms: Evidence from Kosovo," South East European Journal of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 27-43, June.
    19. Strakos, Joshua K. & Quintanilla, Jose A. & Huscroft, Joseph R., 2016. "Department of Defense energy policy and research: A framework to support strategy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 83-91.
    20. Gunday, Gurhan & Ulusoy, Gunduz & Kilic, Kemal & Alpkan, Lutfihak, 2011. "Effects of innovation types on firm performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(2), pages 662-676, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
    • M15 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - IT Management

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:url:upravl:v:11:y:2020:i:4:p:82-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Victor Blaginin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/usueeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.