IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v12y2022i3p89-d870560.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Influencing Tacit Knowledge Sharing in Research Groups in Higher Education Institutions

Author

Listed:
  • Regycleia B. C. Alves

    (Research Center in Business Sciences (NECE-UBI), Department of Management and Economics, University of Beira Interior, 6200-209 Covilhã, Portugal)

  • Paulo Pinheiro

    (Research Center in Business Sciences (NECE-UBI), Department of Management and Economics, University of Beira Interior, 6200-209 Covilhã, Portugal)

Abstract

Higher education institutions (HEIs) create, disseminate, and share knowledge through relationships involving people, processes, and technologies. Tacit knowledge is difficult to formalize and depends on social context. Its sharing is influenced by individual, organizational, and structural factors, and the knowledge management strategy. The literature suggests that this topic is quite relevant and that there is an evident lack of empirical studies investigating the tacit knowledge sharing in higher education institutions (HEIs). In this context, the main objective of this article is to identify the factors that influence the sharing of tacit knowledge in research groups in higher education institutions (HEIs). Data were collected at a Brazilian public higher education institution with a questionnaire applied to research faculty members. The sample was composed of 255 respondents. The data collected enabled the analysis of a structural equation model. The results reveal that individual, organizational structure, and knowledge management strategy factors are determinants for sharing tacit knowledge in the institution’s research groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Regycleia B. C. Alves & Paulo Pinheiro, 2022. "Factors Influencing Tacit Knowledge Sharing in Research Groups in Higher Education Institutions," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:12:y:2022:i:3:p:89-:d:870560
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/12/3/89/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/12/3/89/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R Krishnaveni & R Sujatha, 2012. "Communities of Practice: An Influencing Factor for Effective Knowledge Transfer in Organizations," The IUP Journal of Knowledge Management, IUP Publications, vol. 0(1), pages 26-40, January.
    2. Ikujiro Nonaka & Georg von Krogh, 2009. "Perspective---Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Conversion: Controversy and Advancement in Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 635-652, June.
    3. Vikas Gupta & Asha Thomas, 2019. "Fostering tacit knowledge sharing and innovative work behaviour: an integrated theoretical view," International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(3/4), pages 320-346.
    4. Howell, Kerry E. & Annansingh, Fenio, 2013. "Knowledge generation and sharing in UK universities: A tale of two cultures?," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 32-39.
    5. Luiz Antonio Joia, 2007. "Knowledge management strategies: creating and testing a measurement scale," International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(3), pages 203-221.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ahmad M. Alghamdi & Salvatore Flavio Pileggi & Osama Sohaib, 2023. "Social Media Analysis to Enhance Sustainable Knowledge Management: A Concise Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-30, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Boeker, Warren & Howard, Michael D. & Basu, Sandip & Sahaym, Arvin, 2021. "Interpersonal relationships, digital technologies, and innovation in entrepreneurial ventures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 495-507.
    2. Giovana Escrivão & Marcelo Seido Nagano, 2016. "Linking Knowledge Creation and Environmental Education," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(02), pages 1-23, June.
    3. Sung Hyo Hong, 2021. "Determinants of Selection of R&D Cooperation Partners: Insights from Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-11, August.
    4. Mário Franco & Lurdes Esteves & Margarida Rodrigues, 2024. "Clusters as a Mechanism of Sharing Knowledge and Innovation: Case Study from a Network Approach," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 25(2), pages 377-400, April.
    5. Shan, Wei & Qiao, Tong & Zhang, Mingli, 2020. "Getting more resources for better performance: The effect of user-owned resources on the value of user-generated content," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    6. Deist, Maximilian K. & McDowell, William C. & Bouncken, Ricarda B., 2023. "Digital units and digital innovation: Balancing fluidity and stability for the Creation, Conversion, and Dissemination of sticky knowledge," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    7. Mohajan, Haradhan, 2016. "Sharing of Tacit Knowledge in Organizations: A Review," MPRA Paper 82958, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 15 Jun 2016.
    8. Wei-Shong Lin & Jui-Ling Huang & Margaret L. Sheng, 2014. "How the Organizational Goals Affect Knowledge Management," International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, International School for Social and Business Studies, Celje, Slovenia, vol. 3(1), pages 3-22.
    9. Raed A.I. Abueed & Mehmet Aga, 2019. "Sustainable Knowledge Creation and Corporate Outcomes: Does Corporate Data Governance Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-15, October.
    10. Martin M�ller & Allison Stewart, 2016. "Does Temporary Geographical Proximity Predict Learning? Knowledge Dynamics in the Olympic Games," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(3), pages 377-390, March.
    11. Kwee Keong Choong & Patrick W. Leung, 2022. "A Critical Review of the Precursors of the Knowledge Economy and Their Contemporary Research: Implications for the Computerized New Economy," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(2), pages 1573-1610, June.
    12. Paola Perez-Aleman, 2011. "Collective Learning in Global Diffusion: Spreading Quality Standards in a Developing Country Cluster," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 173-189, February.
    13. Christopher W. Craighead & David J. Ketchen Jr. & Matthew T. Jenkins & Mary C. Holcomb, 2017. "A Supply Chain Perspective on Strategic Foothold Moves in Emerging Markets," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 53(4), pages 3-12, October.
    14. HMJCB Heenkenda & Fengju Xu & KMMCB Kulathunga & WAR Senevirathne, 2022. "The Role of Innovation Capability in Enhancing Sustainability in SMEs: An Emerging Economy Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-22, August.
    15. de Vasconcelos, José Braga & Kimble, Chris & Carreteiro, Paulo & Rocha, Álvaro, 2017. "The application of knowledge management to software evolution," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 1499-1506.
    16. Nhem, Sareth & Lee, Young Jin & Phin, Sopheap, 2017. "Sustainable management of forest in view of media attention to REDD+ policy, opportunity and impact in Cambodia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(P1), pages 10-21.
    17. Rima H. Binsaeed & Zahid Yousaf & Adriana Grigorescu & Raluca Andreea Trandafir & Abdelmohsen A. Nassani, 2023. "Knowledge Sharing and the Moderating Role of Digital Innovation on Employees Innovative Work Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-14, July.
    18. Thuy Do & Frédéric Le Roy & Thuy Seran, 2021. "Cooperation between global and local firms in emerging markets: a coopetition approach The case in Vietnam," Post-Print hal-03215229, HAL.
    19. Abel Duarte Alonso & Seng K. Kok & Seamus O'Brien, 2019. "Understanding Approaches To Innovation Through The Dynamic Capabilities Lens: A Multi-Country Study Of The Wine Industry," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(06), pages 1-30, August.
    20. Olivera Andjelkovic & Mehraz Boolaky, 2015. "Organizational Learning: A Case Study of an International Non-profit Organization," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 6(2), pages 124-137, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:12:y:2022:i:3:p:89-:d:870560. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.