IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v12y2022i3p89-d870560.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Influencing Tacit Knowledge Sharing in Research Groups in Higher Education Institutions

Author

Listed:
  • Regycleia B. C. Alves

    (Research Center in Business Sciences (NECE-UBI), Department of Management and Economics, University of Beira Interior, 6200-209 Covilhã, Portugal)

  • Paulo Pinheiro

    (Research Center in Business Sciences (NECE-UBI), Department of Management and Economics, University of Beira Interior, 6200-209 Covilhã, Portugal)

Abstract

Higher education institutions (HEIs) create, disseminate, and share knowledge through relationships involving people, processes, and technologies. Tacit knowledge is difficult to formalize and depends on social context. Its sharing is influenced by individual, organizational, and structural factors, and the knowledge management strategy. The literature suggests that this topic is quite relevant and that there is an evident lack of empirical studies investigating the tacit knowledge sharing in higher education institutions (HEIs). In this context, the main objective of this article is to identify the factors that influence the sharing of tacit knowledge in research groups in higher education institutions (HEIs). Data were collected at a Brazilian public higher education institution with a questionnaire applied to research faculty members. The sample was composed of 255 respondents. The data collected enabled the analysis of a structural equation model. The results reveal that individual, organizational structure, and knowledge management strategy factors are determinants for sharing tacit knowledge in the institution’s research groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Regycleia B. C. Alves & Paulo Pinheiro, 2022. "Factors Influencing Tacit Knowledge Sharing in Research Groups in Higher Education Institutions," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:12:y:2022:i:3:p:89-:d:870560
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/12/3/89/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/12/3/89/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R Krishnaveni & R Sujatha, 2012. "Communities of Practice: An Influencing Factor for Effective Knowledge Transfer in Organizations," The IUP Journal of Knowledge Management, IUP Publications, vol. 0(1), pages 26-40, January.
    2. Ikujiro Nonaka & Georg von Krogh, 2009. "Perspective---Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Conversion: Controversy and Advancement in Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 635-652, June.
    3. Vikas Gupta & Asha Thomas, 2019. "Fostering tacit knowledge sharing and innovative work behaviour: an integrated theoretical view," International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(3/4), pages 320-346.
    4. Howell, Kerry E. & Annansingh, Fenio, 2013. "Knowledge generation and sharing in UK universities: A tale of two cultures?," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 32-39.
    5. Luiz Antonio Joia, 2007. "Knowledge management strategies: creating and testing a measurement scale," International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(3), pages 203-221.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ahmad M. Alghamdi & Salvatore Flavio Pileggi & Osama Sohaib, 2023. "Social Media Analysis to Enhance Sustainable Knowledge Management: A Concise Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-30, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lirios Alos-Simo & Antonio J. Verdu-Jover & Jose M. Gomez-Gras, 2020. "Knowledge Transfer in Sustainable Contexts: A Comparative Analysis of Periods of Financial Recession and Expansion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-24, June.
    2. Boeker, Warren & Howard, Michael D. & Basu, Sandip & Sahaym, Arvin, 2021. "Interpersonal relationships, digital technologies, and innovation in entrepreneurial ventures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 495-507.
    3. Giovana Escrivão & Marcelo Seido Nagano, 2016. "Linking Knowledge Creation and Environmental Education," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(02), pages 1-23, June.
    4. Maksim S. Kolyasnikov & Natalya R. Kelchevskaya, 2020. "Knowledge management strategies in companies: Trends and the impact of Industry 4.0," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 11(4), pages 82-96, September.
    5. Kawai, Norifumi & Chung, Chul, 2019. "Expatriate utilization, subsidiary knowledge creation and performance: The moderating role of subsidiary strategic context," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 24-36.
    6. Sung Hyo Hong, 2021. "Determinants of Selection of R&D Cooperation Partners: Insights from Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-11, August.
    7. Mário Franco & Lurdes Esteves & Margarida Rodrigues, 2024. "Clusters as a Mechanism of Sharing Knowledge and Innovation: Case Study from a Network Approach," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 25(2), pages 377-400, April.
    8. Zhanna A. Mingaleva & Lyudmila N. Deputatova & Nikolay B. Akatov & Yurii V. Starkov & Elena Mitrofanova, 2019. "Application of HADI-cycle for providing sustainability of processes of knowledge and innovation," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(2), pages 1628-1640, December.
    9. Shan, Wei & Qiao, Tong & Zhang, Mingli, 2020. "Getting more resources for better performance: The effect of user-owned resources on the value of user-generated content," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    10. Deist, Maximilian K. & McDowell, William C. & Bouncken, Ricarda B., 2023. "Digital units and digital innovation: Balancing fluidity and stability for the Creation, Conversion, and Dissemination of sticky knowledge," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    11. Ngoc Thach Pham & Anh Duc Do & Quang Vinh Nguyen & Van Loi Ta & Thi Thanh Binh Dao & Dieu Linh Ha & Xuan Truong Hoang, 2021. "Research on Knowledge Management Models at Universities Using Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, January.
    12. Mohajan, Haradhan, 2016. "Sharing of Tacit Knowledge in Organizations: A Review," MPRA Paper 82958, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 15 Jun 2016.
    13. Wei-Shong Lin & Jui-Ling Huang & Margaret L. Sheng, 2014. "How the Organizational Goals Affect Knowledge Management," International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, International School for Social and Business Studies, Celje, Slovenia, vol. 3(1), pages 3-22.
    14. Muhammad Jahanzaib Yousaf & Qamar Ali, 2018. "Impact of Knowledge Management on Innovation: Evidence from a South Asian Country," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(03), pages 1-18, September.
    15. Raed A.I. Abueed & Mehmet Aga, 2019. "Sustainable Knowledge Creation and Corporate Outcomes: Does Corporate Data Governance Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-15, October.
    16. Martin M�ller & Allison Stewart, 2016. "Does Temporary Geographical Proximity Predict Learning? Knowledge Dynamics in the Olympic Games," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(3), pages 377-390, March.
    17. Nguyet Thi Nguyen, 2023. "The Impact of Intellectual Capital on Service Firm Financial Performance in Emerging Countries: The Case of Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-19, April.
    18. Isabelle Le Breton-Miller & Danny Miller, 2015. "The paradox of resource vulnerability: Considerations for organizational curatorship," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 397-415, March.
    19. Kwee Keong Choong & Patrick W. Leung, 2022. "A Critical Review of the Precursors of the Knowledge Economy and Their Contemporary Research: Implications for the Computerized New Economy," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(2), pages 1573-1610, June.
    20. Hao Zhou & Jie Lin, 2023. "Impacts of codified knowledge index on the allocation of overseas inventors by emerging countries: evidence from PCT patent activities in China," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(2), pages 877-899, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:12:y:2022:i:3:p:89-:d:870560. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.