IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jouent/v1y2015i2p181-200.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategic Capabilities for Public Sector-led Innovation: Managing Knowledge Worker Deployment at and Quality Performance of Public R&D Laboratories in India

Author

Listed:
  • Santanu Roy
  • Jay Mitra

Abstract

We investigate critically the relationship between the knowledge, capabilities of research and development (R&D) personnel, the structure and functions of public R&D laboratories in India and their quality performance record. Our objective is to assess whether this relationship create conditions that are conducive to innovation in developing economy contexts. We draw on theories of R&D management, organisation learning, knowledge management and strategic capability to reflect on contextual complexities that arise as a result of the nature of knowledge-based resources of research organisations. We deploy correspondence analysis and use this method to explore the structure of multivariate relationships among the different laboratories in the analysis, showing how various functions impact on effective R&D management and quality performance measured in terms of patents, publications and citations. We find that strategic innovation practices are essential for supporting pilot plants, experimental field stations and in the engineering and design units. We generate a map of laboratories capturing the innovation continuum as distinguished by their in-built strength in basic research, engineering and design services or the working of pilot plants. The article has particular implications for public R&D management for innovation in a developing economy context where the public sector continues to play a significant role in economic development. It should assist with organising public R&D management for innovation in an emerging economy, a relatively under-researched area. It should also help R&D management practitioners to navigate their way effectively in delivering effective performance outcomes at a time of rapid economic change.

Suggested Citation

  • Santanu Roy & Jay Mitra, 2015. "Strategic Capabilities for Public Sector-led Innovation: Managing Knowledge Worker Deployment at and Quality Performance of Public R&D Laboratories in India," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 1(2), pages 181-200, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jouent:v:1:y:2015:i:2:p:181-200
    DOI: 10.1177/2393957515594713
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2393957515594713
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2393957515594713?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Niosi, Jorge, 1999. "Fourth-Generation R&D: From Linear Models to Flexible Innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 111-117, June.
    2. Malik M.A. Khalfan & Mukesh Kashyap & Xianguang Li & Carl Abbott, 2010. "Knowledge management in construction supply chain integration," International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(2/3), pages 207-221.
    3. Ikujiro Nonaka, 1994. "A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 14-37, February.
    4. Theresa K. Lant, 1992. "Aspiration Level Adaptation: An Empirical Exploration," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(5), pages 623-644, May.
    5. Beise, Marian & Stahl, Harald, 1999. "Public research and industrial innovations in Germany," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 397-422, April.
    6. Richard A. Wolfe, 1994. "Organizational Innovation: Review, Critique And Suggested Research Directions," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 405-431, May.
    7. Gunnar Hedlund, 1994. "A model of knowledge management and the N‐form corporation," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(S2), pages 73-90, June.
    8. Arora, Ashish & Gambardella, Alfonso, 1994. "The changing technology of technological change: general and abstract knowledge and the division of innovative labour," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 523-532, September.
    9. Michael J. Greenacre, 1991. "Interpreting multiple correspondence analysis," Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(2), pages 195-210, June.
    10. Jamie D. Collins & William J. Worthington & Pedro M. Reyes & Marisabel Romero, 2010. "Knowledge management, supply chain technologies, and firm performance," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(10), pages 947-960, September.
    11. Teresa M. Shaft & Iris Vessey, 1995. "Research Report—The Relevance of Application Domain Knowledge: The Case of Computer Program Comprehension," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 6(3), pages 286-299, September.
    12. Julian Birkinshaw & Robert Nobel & Jonas Ridderstråle, 2002. "Knowledge as a Contingency Variable: Do the Characteristics of Knowledge Predict Organization Structure?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 274-289, June.
    13. Shantanu Dutta & Allen M. Weiss, 1997. "The Relationship Between a Firm's Level of Technological Innovativeness and Its Pattern of Partnership Agreements," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(3), pages 343-356, March.
    14. Luiz Antonio Joia, 2007. "Knowledge management strategies: creating and testing a measurement scale," International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(3), pages 203-221.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Fritsch & Viktor Slavtchev, 2007. "What determines the efficiency of regional innovation systems?," Jena Economics Research Papers 2007-006, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    2. Fu-Sheng Tsai & Gayle Baugh & Shih-Chieh Fang & Julia Lin, 2014. "Contingent contingency: Knowledge heterogeneity and new product development performance revisited," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 149-169, March.
    3. Li, Shenxue & Clark, Timothy & Sillince, John, 2018. "Constructing a strategy on the creation of core competencies for African companies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 204-213.
    4. Da Mota de Pina E Cunha, A.M., 1998. "Determinants of Product Innovation in Organizations : Practices and Performance in the Portugese Financial Sector," Other publications TiSEM e6e4e56e-b72a-4392-8d79-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. Li Yue, 2022. "Impact of Tacit Knowledge Acquisition on Innovation Performance of Innovative Enterprises in Guangdong Hong Kong Macao Greater Bay Area," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 14(1), pages 251-272.
    6. Sandra A. Slaughter & Laurie J. Kirsch, 2006. "The Effectiveness of Knowledge Transfer Portfolios in Software Process Improvement: A Field Study," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 301-320, September.
    7. Ali Osman Uymaz, 2015. "Transformational Leadership Influence on Follower Performance through Upward Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 5(6), pages 12-22, June.
    8. Jiménez-Jiménez, Daniel & Sanz-Valle, Raquel, 2011. "Innovation, organizational learning, and performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(4), pages 408-417, April.
    9. Shaker A. Zahra & Anders P. Nielsen & William C. Bogner, 1999. "Corporate Entrepreneurship, Knowledge, and Competence Development," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 23(3), pages 169-189, April.
    10. Xu, Xiaobo & Zhang, Weiyong & Li, Ling, 2016. "The impact of technology type and life cycle on IT productivity variance: A contingency theoretical perspective," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1193-1204.
    11. Ferlie, Ewan & Crilly, Tessa & Jashapara, Ashok & Peckham, Anna, 2012. "Knowledge mobilisation in healthcare: A critical review of health sector and generic management literature," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(8), pages 1297-1304.
    12. Esther Tippmann & Pamela Sharkey Scott & Vincent Mangematin, 2014. "Subsidiary managers’ knowledge mobilizations: Unpacking emergent knowledge flows," Post-Print hal-00864324, HAL.
    13. Dean A. Shepherd & Marc Gruber, 2021. "The Lean Startup Framework: Closing the Academic–Practitioner Divide," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 45(5), pages 967-998, September.
    14. Zhang, Haisu & Wu, Fang & Cui, Anna Shaojie, 2015. "Balancing market exploration and market exploitation in product innovation: A contingency perspective," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 297-308.
    15. Koschatzky, Knut, 2000. "The regionalisation of innovation policy in Germany: theoretical foundations and recent experience," Working Papers "Firms and Region" R1/2000, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    16. Vaccaro, Antonino & Veloso, Francisco & Brusoni, Stefano, 2009. "The impact of virtual technologies on knowledge-based processes: An empirical study," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 1278-1287, October.
    17. Maureen McKelvey & Bastian Rake, 2020. "Exploring scientific publications by firms: what are the roles of academic and corporate partners for publications in high reputation or high impact journals?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(3), pages 1323-1360, March.
    18. Li, Lixu & Ye, Fei & Zhan, Yuanzhu & Kumar, Ajay & Schiavone, Francesco & Li, Yina, 2022. "Unraveling the performance puzzle of digitalization: Evidence from manufacturing firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 54-64.
    19. Guo, Jingjing & Guo, Bin & Zhou, Jianghua & Wu, Xiaobo, 2020. "How does the ambidexterity of technological learning routine affect firm innovation performance within industrial clusters? The moderating effects of knowledge attributes," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    20. Márcio Oliveira & Paulo Pinheiro & João M. Lopes & José Oliveira, 2022. "How to Overcome Barriers to Sharing Tacit Knowledge in Non-Profit Organizations?," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(3), pages 1843-1874, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jouent:v:1:y:2015:i:2:p:181-200. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ediindia.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.