IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/tpolec/doi10.1086-734959.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Distributional Implications of Itemized Medical Deductions

Author

Listed:
  • Gopi Shah Goda
  • Ithai Lurie
  • Priyanka Parikh
  • Chelsea Swete

Abstract

Approximately $76 billion in out-of-pocket medical spending was deducted as an itemized medical deduction in 2021, resulting in about $9 billion in federal forgone tax revenue. We use data from US tax returns to examine how these tax savings are distributed across income and age, how the distributions differ from the mortgage interest deduction, and how the distributions changed with the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Although a given level of medical spending is less likely to be above the income threshold for higher-income households, itemization rates and marginal tax rates increase with income, resulting in tax savings skewed toward higher-income taxpayers: 94% of the tax savings accrue to those in the top half of the income distribution. The tax savings are also highly concentrated at older ages, with 42% accruing to those over age 65. Using rich survey data on out-of-pocket medical spending, we illustrate how the distribution of tax savings varies across policy alternatives. We find that expanding eligibility for the tax subsidy would likely reduce the concentration of tax savings at higher incomes and increase the concentration of tax benefits at older ages.

Suggested Citation

  • Gopi Shah Goda & Ithai Lurie & Priyanka Parikh & Chelsea Swete, 2025. "The Distributional Implications of Itemized Medical Deductions," Tax Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 39(1), pages 1-28.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:tpolec:doi:10.1086/734959
    DOI: 10.1086/734959
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/734959
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/734959
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/734959?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:tpolec:doi:10.1086/734959. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/TPE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.