Game-Theoretic Bankruptcy Valuation
The rules of bankruptcy reorganization in the United States permit a debtor to retain a secured claim's collateral in exchange for judicially approved compensation even over the objection of the secured creditor. An alternative would grant a secured creditor the right to recover its collateral unless satisfied with the compensation, a right often implicit in modern bankruptcy practice despite the formal rules. Either debtor or secured creditor domination of the bankruptcy process may yield inefficient continuation decisions, violations of absolute priority, and high transactions cost. As a remedy to these pitfalls, a mechanism that would mediate between debtor and creditor control and could harness the parties' information about collateral value is proposed here: junior interests would, on behalf of the debtor, propose a reorganization plan that could include a take-it-or-leave-it offer for collateral with assured liquidation of the collateral being the consequence if the secured creditor rejected the plan.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jlstud:doi:10.1086/665705. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Journals Division)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.