IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tec/journl/v37y2022i1p24-36.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do learning ICT usage affect the learning process quality? an empirical study in private university

Author

Listed:
  • Yoga Nindhita

    (Stiesia Surabaya, Indonesia)

  • Budiyanto Budiyanto

    (Stiesia Surabaya, Indonesia)

Abstract

Information Communication Technology (ICT) brings new opportunities to many aspects of society. Applying ICT in education is a valuable contribution to improving quality, especially improving the quality of the learning process in higher education. This study explains the relationship between research variables by testing the description hypothesis. Variables include Learning process quality, ICT learning usage, Technology Characteristics, Individual Characteristics, and Motivation to use ICT. The Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was used to analyze the data in this study. The results show a significant positive effect of learning usage ICT variables, Technology Characteristics, and Individual Characteristics on the quality of the learning process, then Individual Characteristics and Motivation use ICT on ICT learning usage. Meanwhile, the Technology Characteristic variable has no significant positive effect on ICT learning usage. The influence of significant positive variables is expected to be able to be utilized and managed properly so that, in the future, a high-quality learning process will be achieved. Campuses can also act as a forum by providing various competency training so that teaching staff becomes more prepared and competent in learning using ICT. Furthermore, the provision of learning using ICT can be better optimized so that the potential characteristics of the technology can be utilized to the fullest.

Suggested Citation

  • Yoga Nindhita & Budiyanto Budiyanto, 2022. "Do learning ICT usage affect the learning process quality? an empirical study in private university," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 37(1), pages 24-36, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:37:y:2022:i:1:p:24-36
    DOI: 10.47577/tssj.v37i1.7567
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/7567/2750
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/7567
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.47577/tssj.v37i1.7567?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Afzaal H. Seyal & Mohd. Noah Abd Rahman, 2003. "A Preliminary Investigation of E-Commerce Adoption in Small & Medium Enterprises in Brunei," Journal of Global Information Technology Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(2), pages 6-26, April.
    2. Richard L. Daft & Robert H. Lengel, 1986. "Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(5), pages 554-571, May.
    3. Riccardo Lucchetti & Alessandro Sterlacchini, 2004. "The Adoption of ICT among SMEs: Evidence from an Italian Survey," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 151-168, September.
    4. Gerardine DeSanctis & R. Brent Gallupe, 1987. "A Foundation for the Study of Group Decision Support Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(5), pages 589-609, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:thr:techub:10037:y:2022:i:1:p:24-36 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Luis A. Guerrero & José A. Pino, 2009. "Supporting Discussions for Decision Meetings," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 18(6), pages 589-601, November.
    3. Mi, Hwang, 1998. "Did Task Type Matter in the Use of Decision Room GSS? A Critical Review and a Meta-analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 1-15, February.
    4. Michele Griessmair & Sabine T. Koeszegi, 2009. "Exploring the Cognitive-Emotional Fugue in Electronic Negotiations," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 213-234, May.
    5. Rajiv D. Banker & Robert J. Kauffman, 2004. "50th Anniversary Article: The Evolution of Research on Information Systems: A Fiftieth-Year Survey of the Literature in Management Science," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(3), pages 281-298, March.
    6. Franco, L. Alberto & Rouwette, Etiënne A.J.A. & Korzilius, Hubert, 2016. "Different paths to consensus? The impact of need for closure on model-supported group conflict management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(3), pages 878-889.
    7. Shuliang Li & Jim Zheng Li, 2009. "A multi‐agent‐based hybrid framework for international marketing planning under uncertainty," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(3), pages 231-254, July.
    8. Giotopoulos, Ioannis & Kontolaimou, Alexandra & Korra, Efthymia & Tsakanikas, Aggelos, 2017. "What drives ICT adoption by SMEs? Evidence from a large-scale survey in Greece," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 60-69.
    9. Brian Whitworth & Brent Gallupe & Robert McQueen, 2000. "A Cognitive Three-Process Model of Computer-Mediated Group Interaction," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 9(5), pages 431-456, September.
    10. Willem Standaert & Steve Muylle & Amit Basu, 2016. "An empirical study of the effectiveness of telepresence as a business meeting mode," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 323-339, December.
    11. Sanjiv D. Vaidya & Priya Seetharaman, 2011. "Explaining Sophistication in Collaborative Technology Use: A Context—Technology Fit Perspective," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 185-213, March.
    12. Fındık, Derya & Tansel, Aysit, 2013. "Resources on the stage: a firm level analysis of the ict adoption in Turkey," MPRA Paper 65956, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 05 Aug 2014.
    13. Windsperger, Josef, 2001. "The fee structure in franchising: a property rights view," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 219-226, November.
    14. Yang, Jialiang & Li, Yaokuang & Calic, Goran & Shevchenko, Anton, 2020. "How multimedia shape crowdfunding outcomes: The overshadowing effect of images and videos on text in campaign information," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 6-18.
    15. Mahan, Joseph E. & Seo, Won Jae & Jordan, Jeremy S. & Funk, Daniel, 2015. "Exploring the impact of social networking sites on running involvement, running behavior, and social life satisfaction," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 182-192.
    16. Chris Kimble & José Braga Vasconcelos & Álvaro Rocha, 2016. "Competence management in knowledge intensive organizations using consensual knowledge and ontologies," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(6), pages 1119-1130, December.
    17. van Riel, A.C.R. & Lievens, A., 2003. "New service development in high tech sectors: a decision making perspective," Research Memorandum 013, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    18. Elfvengren, K.Kalle & Karkkainen, Hannu & Torkkeli, Marko & Tuominen, Markku, 2004. "A GDSS based approach for the assessment of customer needs in industrial markets," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(3), pages 275-292, June.
    19. Linda Klebe Treviño & Jane Webster & Eric W. Stein, 2000. "Making Connections: Complementary Influences on Communication Media Choices, Attitudes, and Use," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(2), pages 163-182, April.
    20. Bianco, Federica & Michelino, Francesca, 2010. "The role of content management systems in publishing firms," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 117-124.
    21. Proserpio, Luigi & Magni, Massimo, 2012. "Teaching without the teacher? Building a learning environment through computer simulations," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 99-105.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ICT (information; communication and technology); ICS (interactive computer simulation); PhET (physics Education Technology); high school students; physics learning.; blended learnings;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:37:y:2022:i:1:p:24-36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tasente Tanase (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.