IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Differences in Wage Levels Among Metropolitan Areas: Less-educated Workers in the United States

Listed author(s):
  • Todd Easton
  • Mary King
Registered author(s):

    EASTON T. and KING M. C. (2000) Differences in wage levels among metropolitan areas: less-educated workers in the United States, Reg. Studies 34, 21-27. This work investigates the causes of low wages for workers with a high school education or less in the US, using a sample of 241 metropolitan areas drawn from the 1990 Census. It examines the influence of five labour market characteristics on between-metropolitan area wage differences: labour demand, the minimum wage, unionization, industry mix and the race/gender composition of the labour force. The first four factors seem to affect both men's and women's wages, but the relative importance differs. For example, the evidence suggests that unionization is the most important influence on men's wages, while for women industry mix matters most. EASTON T. et KING M. C. (2000) Des ecarts de salaire dans les zones metropolitaines: les salaries moins instruits aux Etats-Unis, Reg. Studies 34, 21-27. A partir d'un echantillon de 241 zones metropolitaines tirees du recensement de 1990, cet article cherche a etudier les causes des bas salaires des travailleurs aux Etats-Unis dont le niveau d'education ne va pas au-dela du secondaire. On examine l'influence de cinq caracteristiques du marche du travail sur les ecarts de salaire par zone metropolitaine: a savoir, offres d'emploi, salaire minimum, syndicalisation, structure industrielle, distribution de la main-d'oeuvre par nationalite et par sexe. Il semble que les quatre premiers facteurs influent sur les salaires et des hommes et des femmes, mais l'importance relative differe. Par exemple, les preuves laissent supposer que la syndicalisation s'avere l'influence la plus importante sur les salaires des hommes alors que, pour ce qui est des femmes, c'est la structure industrielle qui est le plus important. EASTON T. und KING M. C. (2000) Unterschiedliche Lohnhohen in Grossstadtgebieten: ungebildete Arbeiter in den Vereinigten Staaten, Reg. Studies 34, 21-27. Diese Arbeit untersucht die Ursachen der niedrigen Lohne fur Arbeiter mit Oberschulabschluss oder weniger in den Vereinigten Staaten mittels Stichproben von 241 Grossstadtgebieten, die der Volkszahlung des Jahres 1990 entnommen wurden. Sie pruft den Einfluss von den funf Arbeitsplatzmerkmalen: Stellennachfrage, Mindestlohn, gewerkschaftlicher Organisation, Industriemischung und Zusammensetzung der Arbeitnehmer nach Rasse und Geschlecht auf Lohnunterschiede in Grossstadten. Die vier erstgenannten Faktoren scheinen sich auf Lohne von Mannern und Frauen auszuwirken, doch die relative Bedeutung ist unterschiedlich. Die Befunde legen z.B. nahe, dass die gewerkschaftliche Organisation die Lohne der Manner am starksten beeinflusst, wahrend fur Frauen die Mischung der vorhandenen Industrien am wichtigsten ist.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Regional Studies.

    Volume (Year): 34 (2000)
    Issue (Month): 1 ()
    Pages: 21-27

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:34:y:2000:i:1:p:21-27
    DOI: 10.1080/00343400050005853
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Web:

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. Timothy J. Bartik, "undated". "Who Benefits from Local Job Growth: Migrants or Original Residents?," Upjohn Working Papers and Journal Articles tjb1993rs, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
    2. David Neumark & Michael L. Wachter, 1995. "Union Effects on Nonunion Wages: Evidence from Panel Data on Industries and Cities," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 49(1), pages 20-38, October.
    3. Moulton, Brent R., 1986. "Random group effects and the precision of regression estimates," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 385-397, August.
    4. Levy, Frank & Murnane, Richard J, 1992. "U.S. Earnings Levels and Earnings Inequality: A Review of Recent Trends and Proposed Explanations," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 30(3), pages 1333-1381, September.
    5. Randall W. Eberts & Mark E. Schweitzer, 1994. "Regional wage convergence and divergence: adjusting wages for cost-of- living differences," Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, issue Q II, pages 26-37.
    6. Juhn, Chinhui & Murphy, Kevin M & Pierce, Brooks, 1993. "Wage Inequality and the Rise in Returns to Skill," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 101(3), pages 410-442, June.
    7. William T. Dickens & Lawrence F. Katz, 1986. "Interindustry Wage Differences and Industry Characteristics," NBER Working Papers 2014, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. George J. Borjas & Valerie A. Ramey, 1995. "Foreign Competition, Market Power, and Wage Inequality," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 110(4), pages 1075-1110.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:34:y:2000:i:1:p:21-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.