IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/japsta/v40y2013i2p298-310.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling healthcare costs in simultaneous presence of asymmetry, heteroscedasticity and correlation

Author

Listed:
  • Ileana Baldi
  • Eva Pagano
  • Paola Berchialla
  • Alessandro Desideri
  • Alberto Ferrando
  • Franco Merletti
  • Dario Gregori

Abstract

Highly skewed outcome distributions observed across clusters are common in medical research. The aim of this paper is to understand how regression models widely used for accommodating asymmetry fit clustered data under heteroscedasticity. In a simulation study, we provide evidence on the performance of the Gamma Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) and log-Linear Mixed-Effect (LME) model under a variety of data-generating mechanisms. Two case studies from health expenditures literature, the cost of strategies after myocardial infarction randomized clinical trial on the cost of strategies after myocardial infarction and the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel hospital prevalence survey of pressure ulcers, are analyzed and discussed. According to simulation results, the log-LME model for a Gamma response can lead to estimations that are biased by as much as 10% of the true value, depending on the error variance. In the Gamma GLMM, the bias never exceeds 1%, regardless of the extent of heteroscedasticity, and the confidence intervals perform as nominally stated under most conditions. The Gamma GLMM with a log link seems to be more robust to both Gamma and log-normal generating mechanisms than the log-LME model.

Suggested Citation

  • Ileana Baldi & Eva Pagano & Paola Berchialla & Alessandro Desideri & Alberto Ferrando & Franco Merletti & Dario Gregori, 2013. "Modeling healthcare costs in simultaneous presence of asymmetry, heteroscedasticity and correlation," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(2), pages 298-310, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:40:y:2013:i:2:p:298-310
    DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2012.740628
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02664763.2012.740628
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Manning, W. G. & Duan, N. & Rogers, W. H., 1987. "Monte Carlo evidence on the choice between sample selection and two-part models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 59-82, May.
    2. Richard Grieve & Richard Nixon & Simon G. Thompson & Charles Normand, 2005. "Using multilevel models for assessing the variability of multinational resource use and cost data," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(2), pages 185-196, February.
    3. Anirban Basu & Willard G. Manning & John Mullahy, 2004. "Comparing alternative models: log vs Cox proportional hazard?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(8), pages 749-765, August.
    4. Nigel Rice & Andrew Jones, 1997. "Multilevel models and health economics," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 6(6), pages 561-575, November.
    5. Manning, Willard G., 1998. "The logged dependent variable, heteroscedasticity, and the retransformation problem," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 283-295, June.
    6. Thompson, Simon G. & Nixon, Richard M. & Grieve, Richard, 2006. "Addressing the issues that arise in analysing multicentre cost data, with application to a multinational study," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(6), pages 1015-1028, November.
    7. Daowen Zhang & Marie Davidian, 2001. "Linear Mixed Models with Flexible Distributions of Random Effects for Longitudinal Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(3), pages 795-802, September.
    8. Ai, Chunrong & Norton, Edward C., 2000. "Standard errors for the retransformation problem with heteroscedasticity," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(5), pages 697-718, September.
    9. Matthew J. Gurka & Lloyd J. Edwards & Keith E. Muller & Lawrence L. Kupper, 2006. "Extending the Box–Cox transformation to the linear mixed model," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 169(2), pages 273-288, March.
    10. Manning, Willard G. & Mullahy, John, 2001. "Estimating log models: to transform or not to transform?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 461-494, July.
    11. Kathleen Carey, 2000. "A multilevel modelling approach to analysis of patient costs under managed care," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 9(5), pages 435-446, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Besstremyannaya, Galina, 2017. "Measuring income equity in the demand for healthcare with finite mixture models," Applied Econometrics, Publishing House "SINERGIA PRESS", vol. 46, pages 5-29.
    2. Galina Besstremyannaya, 2014. "Heterogeneous effect of coinsurance rate on healthcare costs: generalized finite mixtures and matching estimators," Discussion Papers 14-014, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:40:y:2013:i:2:p:298-310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJAS20 .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.