Evaluating forecast performances of the quantile autoregression models in the present global crisis in international equity markets
In this research, we compare the one-step-ahead out-of-sample forecast performances of the linear Quantile Autoregression (QAR) model as well as the latest sophisticated nonlinear copula-based QAR models for four daily equity index returns during the current financial tumultuous period. In addition, two Conditional Autoregressive Value-at-Risk (CAViaR) models proposed by Engle and Manganelli (2004) are also considered. In order to obtain the robust evaluation results, we estimate the time-varying parameters via two forecasting schemes (recursive and rolling) and examine the accuracy of the Value-at-Risk (VaR) forecast by three different test procedures. Our main findings are that the CAViaR models provide good forecast performance in most cases and they are superior to both linear and nonlinear copula-based QAR models.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 23 (2013)
Issue (Month): 2 (January)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAFE20|
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RAFE20|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apfiec:v:23:y:2013:i:2:p:105-117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.