IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ssi/jouesi/v6y2018i2p890-911.html

Impact of spatial development on sustainable entrepreneurship

Author

Listed:
  • Elena Petrovna Kiselitsa

    (Tyumen State University, Russian Federation)

  • Natalia Nikolaevna Shilova

    (Tyumen Industrial University, Russian Federation)

  • Irina Aleksandrovna Liman

    (Tyumen State University, Russian Federation)

  • Egor Evgenyevich Naumenko

    (Tyumen State University, Russian Federation)

Abstract

The article considers the factors that impede the sustainable development of entrepreneurship. The results of the studies are presented that prove that spatial development based on the growth of agglomerative formations with time can start to hamper the innovative development of entrepreneurship in the regions. The change of the consolidated innovation index is studied depending on the size of the agglomeration zone and the scope of works in terms of the number of city inhabitants. The reasons limiting prospects of the agglomeration growth of large formations, in particular, the mass outflow of the population to large cities and low natural growth of the population, are researched. The compensatory possibilities of migratory flows have been studied and the expediency of ensuring sustainable entrepreneurship based on the new scheme of spatial development of Russia on the basis of agglomeration transformations, and primarily the formation of non-urban agglomerations, has been proved.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena Petrovna Kiselitsa & Natalia Nikolaevna Shilova & Irina Aleksandrovna Liman & Egor Evgenyevich Naumenko, 2018. "Impact of spatial development on sustainable entrepreneurship," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(2), pages 890-911, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:6:y:2018:i:2:p:890-911
    DOI: 10.9770/jesi.2018.6.2(28)
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/uploads/articles/22/Kiselitsa_Impact_of_spatial_development_on_sustainable_entrepreneurship.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/259
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.9770/jesi.2018.6.2(28)?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shi, Lei & Wu, Kuo-Jui & Tseng, Ming-Lang, 2017. "Improving corporate sustainable development by using an interdependent closed-loop hierarchical structure," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 24-35.
    2. Fagerberg, Jan & Srholec, Martin, 2008. "National innovation systems, capabilities and economic development," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(9), pages 1417-1435, October.
    3. Ronald H. Coase, 2025. "The Institutional Structure of Production," Springer Books, in: Claude Ménard & Mary M. Shirley (ed.), Handbook of New Institutional Economics, edition 0, chapter 3, pages 37-46, Springer.
    4. Andrey S. Mikhaylov, 2018. "Socio-spatial dynamics, networks and modelling of regional milieu," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 5(4), pages 1020-1030, June.
    5. Edward L. Glaeser, 2005. "Reinventing Boston: 1630--2003," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 5(2), pages 119-153, April.
    6. Andrey S. Mikhaylov, 2018. "Socio-spatial dynamics, networks and modelling of regional milieu," Post-Print hal-01860131, HAL.
    7. Leontief, Wassily, 1977. "The future of the world economy+," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 171-182.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zehua Wang & Fachao Liang & Sheng-Hau Lin, 2023. "Can socially sustainable development be achieved through homestead withdrawal? A hybrid multiple-attributes decision analysis," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, December.
    2. José Alberto Martínez-González & Urszula Kobylinska & Desiderio Gutiérrez-Taño, 2021. "Exploring Personal and Contextual Variables of the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor through the Rasch Mathematical Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(16), pages 1-23, August.
    3. José Alberto Martínez-González & Urszula Kobylinska & Francisco J. García-Rodríguez & Lukasz Nazarko, 2019. "Antecedents of Entrepreneurial Intention among Young People: Model and Regional Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-29, December.
    4. Keti Lelo & Salvatore Monni & Federico Tomassi, 2018. "Urban inequalities in Italy: a comparison between Rome, Milan and Naples," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(2), pages 939-957, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heng Cui & Hanzhen Fang & Yiyuan Tian & Wenlong Zheng & Wenzhuo Li & Wengao Tian, 2022. "Evaluation of Livability of Wuhan under Ecological Construction and Analysis of Its Spatial Pattern," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-25, September.
    2. Keti Lelo & Salvatore Monni & Federico Tomassi, 2018. "Urban inequalities in Italy: a comparison between Rome, Milan and Naples," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(2), pages 939-957, December.
    3. Asef Karimi & Haniye Rezaei & Morteza Akbari & Pantea Foroudi, 2021. "The concept of innovation network: an application of the meta-synthesis approach," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 11(1), pages 399-419, December.
    4. Viacheslav B. Dziundziuk & Oleksandr A. Kotukov & Dmytro V. Hryn & Eugene V. Kotukh, 2020. "Spread of virtual communities as a potential threat to state security and sustainable well-being," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(2 suppl.), pages 7-18.
    5. Ron Boschma, 2018. "The geographical dimension of structural change," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1839, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Nov 2018.
    6. Wei Jiang & Aric Xu Wang & Kevin Zheng Zhou & Chuang Zhang, 2020. "Stakeholder Relationship Capability and Firm Innovation: A Contingent Analysis," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(1), pages 111-125, November.
    7. Jan Fagerberg & Bengt-Åke Lundvall & Martin Srholec, 2018. "Global Value Chains, National Innovation Systems and Economic Development," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 30(3), pages 533-556, July.
    8. Jan Fagerberg & Martin Srholec, 2017. "Global Dynamics, Capabilities and the Crisis," Economic Complexity and Evolution, in: Andreas Pyka & Uwe Cantner (ed.), Foundations of Economic Change, pages 83-106, Springer.
    9. Rita YI MAN LI, 2008. "Nature Of The Firm: A Study On Developers In China And Hong Kong," Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, Spiru Haret University, Faculty of Financial Management and Accounting Craiova, vol. 3(4(6)_Wint).
    10. Castellacci, Fulvio & Natera, Jose Miguel, 2013. "The dynamics of national innovation systems: A panel cointegration analysis of the coevolution between innovative capability and absorptive capacity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 579-594.
    11. Schmid, Andreas, 2007. "Incentive Compatibility and Efficiency in the contractual Insurer-Provider Relationship: Economic Theory and practical Implications: The Case of North Carolina," MPRA Paper 23311, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2008.
    12. Zhangqi Zhong & Lingyun He, 2022. "Macro-Regional Economic Structural Change Driven by Micro-founded Technological Innovation Diffusion: An Agent-Based Computational Economic Modeling Approach," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 59(2), pages 471-525, February.
    13. Michel S. Zouboulakis & John Kamarianos, 2002. "Racionalidad y cooperación entre firmas. Examen del comportamiento habitual de las industrias griegas," Revista de Economía Institucional, Universidad Externado de Colombia - Facultad de Economía, vol. 4(7), pages 98-113, July-Dece.
    14. Yuan, Qianqian & Xu, Yunqing & Han, Myat Su & Wen, Wen, 2024. "A spatiotemporal analysis approach for multidimensional assessment of renewable energy development in ASEAN countries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(PA).
    15. Ugur, Mehmet, 2010. "Institutions and economic performance: a review of the theory and evidence," MPRA Paper 25909, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Oct 2010.
    16. Yoon, Hyungseok (David) & Boudreaux, Christopher & Kim, Namil, 2024. "Connecting the dots between democracy and innovation: The role of pro-market institutions and information processing," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(8).
    17. Petr Pavlínek, 2012. "The Internationalization of Corporate R&D and the Automotive Industry R&D of East-Central Europe," Economic Geography, Clark University, vol. 88(3), pages 279-310, July.
    18. Banterle, Alessandro & Stranieri, Stefanella, 2008. "The consequences of voluntary traceability system for supply chain relationships. An application of transaction cost economics," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 560-569, December.
    19. Wim Naudé, 2011. "Foreign Aid for Innovation: The Missing Ingredient in Private Sector Development?," Working Papers 2011/35, Maastricht School of Management.
    20. Wiser, R. H., 2000. "The role of public policy in emerging green power markets: an analysis of marketer preferences," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 4(2), pages 177-212, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • R11 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes
    • R12 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity; Interregional Trade (economic geography)

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:6:y:2018:i:2:p:890-911. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Manuela Tvaronaviciene (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.