IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/waterr/v33y2019i6d10.1007_s11269-019-02205-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Similarity Metrics-Based Uncertainty Analysis of River Water Quality Models

Author

Listed:
  • Shirin Karimi

    (University of Tehran)

  • Bahman Jabbarian Amiri

    (University of Tehran)

  • Arash Malekian

    (University of Tehran)

Abstract

Uncertainty analysis (UA) is essential to reinforce the decisions made by water resource engineers and managers. In this study, the stepwise multiple linear regression procedure assessed the relationship between water quality parameters and physical characteristics of 48 catchments in the southwestern basin of the Caspian Sea, Iran. The results of the modeling showed that the coefficient of determination ranged between 0.47 and 0.68 and indicated a positive relationship between the area (%) of agricultural lands and the sodium adsorption ratio (SAR), potassium (K) and total dissolved solids (TDS). A negative relationship was also found between bicarbonate (HCO3−) and the area (%) of the intermediate-density forest. In contrast to previous studies focusing on analyzing the uncertainty of the model parameters, we addressed the uncertainty of the model variables. The results of the GLUE-based uncertainty analysis (UA) performed on the model’s variables indicated that the measures of the R-factor for all models were between 0.13 and 0.98. The lowest R-factor was obtained for the HCO3− model (0.13) suggesting it performed well when predicting HCO3−. To increase the degree of objectivity in the GLUE-UA method, a set of similarity metrics, including Czekanowski, Motyka, Ruzicka, Cosine, Kumar-Hassebrook, Jaccard and Dice was applied to determine the degree of proximity and or similarity between the probability density functions of the measured and simulated water quality parameters. The measures of the similarity metrics for the HCO3− model were generally close to 1, indicating good performance and low uncertainty, while it showed higher uncertainty (between 0.2487 and 0.897) for the other three models (SAR, K, and TDS).

Suggested Citation

  • Shirin Karimi & Bahman Jabbarian Amiri & Arash Malekian, 2019. "Similarity Metrics-Based Uncertainty Analysis of River Water Quality Models," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(6), pages 1927-1945, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:33:y:2019:i:6:d:10.1007_s11269-019-02205-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s11269-019-02205-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-019-02205-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11269-019-02205-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francesca Palomba & Giorgio Cesari & Remo Pelillo & Andrea Petroselli, 2018. "An Empirical Model for River Ecological Management with Uncertainty Evaluation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(3), pages 897-912, February.
    2. He, Jianqiang & Jones, James W. & Graham, Wendy D. & Dukes, Michael D., 2010. "Influence of likelihood function choice for estimating crop model parameters using the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation method," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 103(5), pages 256-264, June.
    3. Mansour Talebizadeh & Saeid Morid & Seyyed Ayyoubzadeh & Mehdi Ghasemzadeh, 2010. "Uncertainty Analysis in Sediment Load Modeling Using ANN and SWAT Model," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 24(9), pages 1747-1761, July.
    4. Zhengli Zhu & Chunxia Zhao & Yingkun Hou, 2012. "Research on Similarity Measurement for Texture Image Retrieval," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-14, September.
    5. Helton, J.C. & Johnson, J.D. & Sallaberry, C.J. & Storlie, C.B., 2006. "Survey of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(10), pages 1175-1209.
    6. Azam Haidary & Bahman Amiri & Jan Adamowski & Nicola Fohrer & Kaneyuki Nakane, 2013. "Assessing the Impacts of Four Land Use Types on the Water Quality of Wetlands in Japan," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(7), pages 2217-2229, May.
    7. Emanuele Borgonovo & William Castaings & Stefano Tarantola, 2011. "Moment Independent Importance Measures: New Results and Analytical Test Cases," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 404-428, March.
    8. Francesca Palomba & Giorgio Cesari & Remo Pelillo & Andrea Petroselli, 2018. "Correction to: An Empirical Model for River Ecological Management with Uncertainty Evaluation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(5), pages 1931-1931, March.
    9. A. Sharafati & H. M. Azamathulla, 2018. "Assessment of Dam Overtopping Reliability using SUFI Based Overtopping Threshold Curve," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(7), pages 2369-2383, May.
    10. A. Kay & H. Davies & V. Bell & R. Jones, 2009. "Comparison of uncertainty sources for climate change impacts: flood frequency in England," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 92(1), pages 41-63, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hüseyin Akay & Müsteyde Baduna Koçyiğit, 2021. "An Approach for Determination of the Drainage Network Effect on GIUH Using Hesitant Probabilistic Fuzzy Linguistic Sets," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(11), pages 3873-3902, September.
    2. Mohammad Ehteram & Ali Najah Ahmed & Chow Ming Fai & Haitham Abdulmohsin Afan & Ahmed El-Shafie, 2019. "Accuracy Enhancement for Zone Mapping of a Solar Radiation Forecasting Based Multi-Objective Model for Better Management of the Generation of Renewable Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-26, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jing Guo & Hailiang Xu & Guangpeng Zhang & Kaiye Yuan & Hongbo Ling, 2020. "The Enhanced Management of Water Resources Improves Ecosystem Services in a Typical Arid Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-25, October.
    2. Dawei Zhang & Weilin Li & Xiaohua Wu & Tie Liu, 2018. "An Efficient Regional Sensitivity Analysis Method Based on Failure Probability with Hybrid Uncertainty," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, June.
    3. Tatsuya Sakurahara & Seyed Reihani & Ernie Kee & Zahra Mohaghegh, 2020. "Global importance measure methodology for integrated probabilistic risk assessment," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(2), pages 377-396, April.
    4. Zhou, Yuekuan & Zheng, Siqian, 2020. "Uncertainty study on thermal and energy performances of a deterministic parameters based optimal aerogel glazing system using machine-learning method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    5. Rei Itsukushima & Yohei Ogahara & Yuki Iwanaga & Tatsuro Sato, 2018. "Investigating the Influence of Various Stormwater Runoff Control Facilities on Runoff Control Efficiency in a Small Catchment Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-12, February.
    6. Ibsen Chivatá Cárdenas & Saad S. H. Al‐Jibouri & Johannes I. M. Halman & Wim van de Linde & Frank Kaalberg, 2014. "Using Prior Risk‐Related Knowledge to Support Risk Management Decisions: Lessons Learnt from a Tunneling Project," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(10), pages 1923-1943, October.
    7. Helton, Jon C. & Johnson, Jay D. & Sallaberry, Cédric J., 2011. "Quantification of margins and uncertainties: Example analyses from reactor safety and radioactive waste disposal involving the separation of aleatory and epistemic uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(9), pages 1014-1033.
    8. Plischke, Elmar & Borgonovo, Emanuele, 2019. "Copula theory and probabilistic sensitivity analysis: Is there a connection?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 1046-1059.
    9. Saurbayeva, Assemgul & Memon, Shazim Ali & Kim, Jong, 2023. "Integrated multi-stage sensitivity analysis and multi-objective optimization approach for PCM integrated residential buildings in different climate zones," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PB).
    10. Donghyeon Yoo & Jinhwan Park & Jaemin Moon & Changwan Kim, 2021. "Reliability-Based Design Optimization for Reducing the Performance Failure and Maximizing the Specific Energy of Lithium-Ion Batteries Considering Manufacturing Uncertainty of Porous Electrodes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, September.
    11. Mompremier, R. & Her, Y. & Hoogenboom, G. & Migliaccio, K. & Muñoz-Carpena, R. & Brym, Z. & Colbert, R.W. & Jeune, W., 2021. "Modeling the response of dry bean yield to irrigation water availability controlled by watershed hydrology," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    12. Li-Chi Chiang & Indrajeet Chaubey & Nien-Ming Hong & Yu-Pin Lin & Tao Huang, 2012. "Implementation of BMP Strategies for Adaptation to Climate Change and Land Use Change in a Pasture-Dominated Watershed," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-31, October.
    13. Tian, Wei & Song, Jitian & Li, Zhanyong & de Wilde, Pieter, 2014. "Bootstrap techniques for sensitivity analysis and model selection in building thermal performance analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 320-328.
    14. Javier Urquizo & Carlos Calderón & Philip James, 2017. "Using a Local Framework Combining Principal Component Regression and Monte Carlo Simulation for Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis of a Domestic Energy Model in Sub-City Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, December.
    15. Nima Fayaz & Laura E. Condon & David G. Chandler, 2020. "Evaluating the Sensitivity of Projected Reservoir Reliability to the Choice of Climate Projection: A Case Study of Bull Run Watershed, Portland, Oregon," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(6), pages 1991-2009, April.
    16. Simon Gosling & Glenn McGregor & Jason Lowe, 2012. "The benefits of quantifying climate model uncertainty in climate change impacts assessment: an example with heat-related mortality change estimates," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 112(2), pages 217-231, May.
    17. Cao, Jiaokun & Du, Farong & Ding, Shuiting, 2013. "Global sensitivity analysis for dynamic systems with stochastic input processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 106-117.
    18. Chen, Shang & He, Liang & Cao, Yinxuan & Wang, Runhong & Wu, Lianhai & Wang, Zhao & Zou, Yufeng & Siddique, Kadambot H.M. & Xiong, Wei & Liu, Manshuang & Feng, Hao & Yu, Qiang & Wang, Xiaoming & He, J, 2021. "Comparisons among four different upscaling strategies for cultivar genetic parameters in rainfed spring wheat phenology simulations with the DSSAT-CERES-Wheat model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    19. Guo, Zehua & Dailey, Ryan & Feng, Tangtao & Zhou, Yukun & Sun, Zhongning & Corradini, Michael L & Wang, Jun, 2021. "Uncertainty analysis of ATF Cr-coated-Zircaloy on BWR in-vessel accident progression during a station blackout," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    20. Li Li & Qidi Yu & Ling Gao & Bin Yu & Zhipeng Lu, 2021. "The Effect of Urban Land-Use Change on Runoff Water Quality: A Case Study in Hangzhou City," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-12, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:33:y:2019:i:6:d:10.1007_s11269-019-02205-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.