IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i7p1684-d154877.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Efficient Regional Sensitivity Analysis Method Based on Failure Probability with Hybrid Uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Dawei Zhang

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, School of Automation, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710129, Shaanxi, China
    School of Basic Science for Aviation, Naval Aviation University, Yantai 264001, Shandong, China)

  • Weilin Li

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, School of Automation, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710129, Shaanxi, China)

  • Xiaohua Wu

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, School of Automation, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710129, Shaanxi, China)

  • Tie Liu

    (Coastal Defense College, Naval Aviation University, Yantai 264001, Shandong, China)

Abstract

The application of reliability sensitivity analysis (RSA) to the high voltage direct current (HVDC) transmission systems is one of the hot topics in the future. A regional RSA method, the contribution to failure probability (CFP) plot, is investigated in this paper. This CFP plot contains both aleatory and epistemic uncertain variables modeled as random variables by probability theory and interval variables by evidence theory, respectively. A surrogate model of second-level limit state function needs to be established for each joint focal element (JFE), which is a time-consuming process. Additionally, an excessive number of Monte Carlo simulations (MCS) and optimizations may exceed the computing power of modern computers. In order to deal with the above problems and further decrease the computational cost, a more effective CFP calculation method under the framework of random-evidence hybrid reliability analysis is proposed. Three important improvements in the proposed method make the calculation of CFP more efficient and easy to implement. Firstly, an active learning kriging (ALK) based on the symbol prediction idea is employed to directly establish a surrogate model rather than a second-level limit state function with fewer function calls, which greatly simplifies construction of the model. Secondly, a random set-based Monte Carlo simulation (RS-MCS) is used to handle the issue of oversized optimization caused by too many JFEs. Thirdly, for further reducing the size of optimizations and improving the efficiency of the CFP calculation, a Karush-Kuhn-Tucker-based optimization (KKTO) method is recommended in the proposed method to solve the extreme value of performance function. A numerical example and an engineering example were studied to verify the accuracy, effectiveness and practicality of the proposed method. It can be seen from the results that regardless of whether it is modeling or computational efficiency, the proposed method is better than the original method.

Suggested Citation

  • Dawei Zhang & Weilin Li & Xiaohua Wu & Tie Liu, 2018. "An Efficient Regional Sensitivity Analysis Method Based on Failure Probability with Hybrid Uncertainty," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:7:p:1684-:d:154877
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/7/1684/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/7/1684/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emanuele Borgonovo & William Castaings & Stefano Tarantola, 2011. "Moment Independent Importance Measures: New Results and Analytical Test Cases," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 404-428, March.
    2. Bolado-Lavin, R. & Castaings, W. & Tarantola, S., 2009. "Contribution to the sample mean plot for graphical and numerical sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(6), pages 1041-1049.
    3. Sudret, Bruno, 2008. "Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(7), pages 964-979.
    4. Guijie Li & Zhenzhou Lu & Longfei Tian & Jia Xu, 2013. "The importance measure on the non-probabilistic reliability index of uncertain structures," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 227(6), pages 651-661, December.
    5. Li, Luyi & Lu, Zhenzhou & Hu, JiXiang, 2014. "A new kind of regional importance measure of the input variable and its state dependent parameter solution," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 1-16.
    6. Helton, J.C. & Johnson, J.D. & Sallaberry, C.J. & Storlie, C.B., 2006. "Survey of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(10), pages 1175-1209.
    7. Zhang, Z. & Jiang, C. & Wang, G.G. & Han, X., 2015. "First and second order approximate reliability analysis methods using evidence theory," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 40-49.
    8. Song, Shufang & Lu, Zhenzhou & Qiao, Hongwei, 2009. "Subset simulation for structural reliability sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 658-665.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Keshtegar, Behrooz & Chakraborty, Subrata, 2018. "An efficient-robust structural reliability method by adaptive finite-step length based on Armijo line search," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 195-206.
    2. Wei, Pengfei & Lu, Zhenzhou & Song, Jingwen, 2015. "Variable importance analysis: A comprehensive review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 399-432.
    3. Borgonovo, Emanuele & Plischke, Elmar, 2016. "Sensitivity analysis: A review of recent advances," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 869-887.
    4. Matieyendou Lamboni, 2020. "Uncertainty quantification: a minimum variance unbiased (joint) estimator of the non-normalized Sobol’ indices," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(5), pages 1939-1970, October.
    5. Zio, E. & Pedroni, N., 2012. "Monte Carlo simulation-based sensitivity analysis of the model of a thermal–hydraulic passive system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 90-106.
    6. Chen, Xin & Molina-Cristóbal, Arturo & Guenov, Marin D. & Riaz, Atif, 2019. "Efficient method for variance-based sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 97-115.
    7. Matieyendou Lamboni, 2018. "Global sensitivity analysis: a generalized, unbiased and optimal estimator of total-effect variance," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 361-386, March.
    8. Jiang, Chen & Qiu, Haobo & Yang, Zan & Chen, Liming & Gao, Liang & Li, Peigen, 2019. "A general failure-pursuing sampling framework for surrogate-based reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 47-59.
    9. Ehre, Max & Papaioannou, Iason & Straub, Daniel, 2020. "Global sensitivity analysis in high dimensions with PLS-PCE," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    10. Shengwen Yin & Keliang Jin & Yu Bai & Wei Zhou & Zhonggang Wang, 2023. "Solution-Space-Reduction-Based Evidence Theory Method for Stiffness Evaluation of Air Springs with Epistemic Uncertainty," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, March.
    11. Xiang Peng & Xiaoqing Xu & Jiquan Li & Shaofei Jiang, 2021. "A Sampling-Based Sensitivity Analysis Method Considering the Uncertainties of Input Variables and Their Distribution Parameters," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-18, May.
    12. Zdeněk Kala, 2020. "Sensitivity Analysis in Probabilistic Structural Design: A Comparison of Selected Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-19, June.
    13. Shirin Karimi & Bahman Jabbarian Amiri & Arash Malekian, 2019. "Similarity Metrics-Based Uncertainty Analysis of River Water Quality Models," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(6), pages 1927-1945, April.
    14. Marrel, Amandine & Chabridon, Vincent, 2021. "Statistical developments for target and conditional sensitivity analysis: Application on safety studies for nuclear reactor," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    15. Anstett-Collin, F. & Goffart, J. & Mara, T. & Denis-Vidal, L., 2015. "Sensitivity analysis of complex models: Coping with dynamic and static inputs," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 268-275.
    16. Li, Chenzhao & Mahadevan, Sankaran, 2016. "An efficient modularized sample-based method to estimate the first-order Sobol׳ index," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 110-121.
    17. Xu, Jun & Kong, Fan, 2018. "A new unequal-weighted sampling method for efficient reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 94-102.
    18. Zhu, Xujia & Sudret, Bruno, 2021. "Global sensitivity analysis for stochastic simulators based on generalized lambda surrogate models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    19. Sarazin, Gabriel & Morio, Jérôme & Lagnoux, Agnès & Balesdent, Mathieu & Brevault, Loïc, 2021. "Reliability-oriented sensitivity analysis in presence of data-driven epistemic uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    20. Pan, Qiujing & Dias, Daniel, 2017. "Sliced inverse regression-based sparse polynomial chaos expansions for reliability analysis in high dimensions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 484-493.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:7:p:1684-:d:154877. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.