IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agisys/v103y2010i5p256-264.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of likelihood function choice for estimating crop model parameters using the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation method

Author

Listed:
  • He, Jianqiang
  • Jones, James W.
  • Graham, Wendy D.
  • Dukes, Michael D.

Abstract

Proper estimation of model parameters is required for ensuring accurate model predictions and good model-based decisions. The generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) method is a Bayesian Monte Carlo parameter estimation technique that makes use of a likelihood function to measure the closeness-of-fit of modeled and observed data. Various likelihood functions and methods of combining likelihood values have been used in previous studies. This research was conducted to determine the effects of using previously reported likelihood functions in a GLUE procedure for estimating parameters in a widely-used crop simulation model. A factorial computer experiment was conducted with synthetic measurement data to compare four likelihood functions and three methods of combining likelihood values using the CERES-Maize model of the Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT). The procedure used an arbitrarily-selected parameter set as the known "true parameter set" and the CERES-Maize model to generate true output values. Then synthetic observations of crop variables were randomly generated (four replicates) by using the simulated true output values (dry yield, anthesis date, maturity date, leaf nitrogen concentration, soil nitrate concentration, and soil moisture) and adding a random observation error based on the variances of corresponding field measurements. The environmental conditions were obtained from a sweet corn (Zea mays L.) experiment conducted in 2005 in northern Florida. Results showed that the method of combining likelihood values had a strong influence on parameter estimates. The combination method based on the product of the likelihoods associated with each set of observations reduced the uncertainties in posterior distributions of parameter estimates most significantly. It was also found that the likelihood function based on Gaussian probability density function was the best among those tested. This combination accurately estimated the true parameter values, suggesting that it can be used when estimating CERES-Maize model parameters for real experiments.

Suggested Citation

  • He, Jianqiang & Jones, James W. & Graham, Wendy D. & Dukes, Michael D., 2010. "Influence of likelihood function choice for estimating crop model parameters using the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation method," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 103(5), pages 256-264, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:103:y:2010:i:5:p:256-264
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308-521X(10)00017-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Makowski, David & Naud, Cédric & Jeuffroy, Marie-Hélène & Barbottin, Aude & Monod, Hervé, 2006. "Global sensitivity analysis for calculating the contribution of genetic parameters to the variance of crop model prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(10), pages 1142-1147.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Xinguo & Li, Yi & Yao, Ning & Liu, De Li & Javed, Tehseen & Liu, Chuncheng & Liu, Fenggui, 2020. "Impacts of multi-timescale SPEI and SMDI variations on winter wheat yields," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    2. Shen, Hongzheng & Wang, Yue & Jiang, Kongtao & Li, Shilei & Huang, Donghua & Wu, Jiujiang & Wang, Yongqiang & Wang, Yangren & Ma, Xiaoyi, 2022. "Simulation modeling for effective management of irrigation water for winter wheat," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    3. Zhang, Jing & Chen, Yi & Zhang, Zhao, 2020. "A remote sensing-based scheme to improve regional crop model calibration at sub-model component level," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    4. Yan, Ling & Jin, Jiming & Wu, Pute, 2020. "Impact of parameter uncertainty and water stress parameterization on wheat growth simulations using CERES-Wheat with GLUE," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    5. Ahmadi, Mehdi & Ascough, James C. & DeJonge, Kendall C. & Arabi, Mazdak, 2014. "Multisite-multivariable sensitivity analysis of distributed watershed models: Enhancing the perceptions from computationally frugal methods," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 279(C), pages 54-67.
    6. Zhong, Honglin & Sun, Laixiang & Fischer, Günther & Tian, Zhan & van Velthuizen, Harrij & Liang, Zhuoran, 2017. "Mission Impossible? Maintaining regional grain production level and recovering local groundwater table by cropping system adaptation across the North China Plain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 1-12.
    7. Si, Zhuanyun & Zain, Muhammad & Li, Shuang & Liu, Junming & Liang, Yueping & Gao, Yang & Duan, Aiwang, 2021. "Optimizing nitrogen application for drip-irrigated winter wheat using the DSSAT-CERES-Wheat model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    8. Abhishes Lamsal & Stephen M Welch & Jeffrey W White & Kelly R Thorp & Nora M Bello, 2018. "Estimating parametric phenotypes that determine anthesis date in Zea mays: Challenges in combining ecophysiological models with genetics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, April.
    9. Enliang Guo & Jiquan Zhang & Yongfang Wang & Ha Si & Feng Zhang, 2016. "Dynamic risk assessment of waterlogging disaster for maize based on CERES-Maize model in Midwest of Jilin Province, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 83(3), pages 1747-1761, September.
    10. Zhang, Ziya & Li, Yi & Chen, Xinguo & Wang, Yanzi & Niu, Ben & Liu, De Li & He, Jianqiang & Pulatov, Bakhtiyor & Hassan, Ishtiaq & Meng, Qingtao, 2023. "Impact of climate change and planting date shifts on growth and yields of double cropping rice in southeastern China in future," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    11. Tian, Zhan & Zhong, Honglin & Sun, Laixiang & Fischer, Günther & van Velthuizen, Harrij & Liang, Zhuoran, 2014. "Improving performance of Agro-Ecological Zone (AEZ) modeling by cross-scale model coupling: An application to japonica rice production in Northeast China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 290(C), pages 155-164.
    12. Yingnan Wei & Han Ru & Xiaolan Leng & Zhijian He & Olusola O. Ayantobo & Tehseen Javed & Ning Yao, 2022. "Better Performance of the Modified CERES-Wheat Model in Simulating Evapotranspiration and Wheat Growth under Water Stress Conditions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-15, November.
    13. Dzotsi, K.A. & Basso, B. & Jones, J.W., 2015. "Parameter and uncertainty estimation for maize, peanut and cotton using the SALUS crop model," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 31-47.
    14. Shafiei, Mojtaba & Ghahraman, Bijan & Saghafian, Bahram & Davary, Kamran & Pande, Saket & Vazifedoust, Majid, 2014. "Uncertainty assessment of the agro-hydrological SWAP model application at field scale: A case study in a dry region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 324-334.
    15. Yao, Ning & Li, Yi & Xu, Fang & Liu, Jian & Chen, Shang & Ma, Haijiao & Wai Chau, Henry & Liu, De Li & Li, Meng & Feng, Hao & Yu, Qiang & He, Jianqiang, 2020. "Permanent wilting point plays an important role in simulating winter wheat growth under water deficit conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    16. He, Jianqiang & Dukes, Michael D. & Hochmuth, George J. & Jones, James W. & Graham, Wendy D., 2012. "Identifying irrigation and nitrogen best management practices for sweet corn production on sandy soils using CERES-Maize model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 61-70.
    17. Chen, Shang & He, Liang & Cao, Yinxuan & Wang, Runhong & Wu, Lianhai & Wang, Zhao & Zou, Yufeng & Siddique, Kadambot H.M. & Xiong, Wei & Liu, Manshuang & Feng, Hao & Yu, Qiang & Wang, Xiaoming & He, J, 2021. "Comparisons among four different upscaling strategies for cultivar genetic parameters in rainfed spring wheat phenology simulations with the DSSAT-CERES-Wheat model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    18. Shirin Karimi & Bahman Jabbarian Amiri & Arash Malekian, 2019. "Similarity Metrics-Based Uncertainty Analysis of River Water Quality Models," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(6), pages 1927-1945, April.
    19. Mompremier, R. & Her, Y. & Hoogenboom, G. & Migliaccio, K. & Muñoz-Carpena, R. & Brym, Z. & Colbert, R.W. & Jeune, W., 2021. "Modeling the response of dry bean yield to irrigation water availability controlled by watershed hydrology," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    20. Yahui Guo & Wenxiang Wu & Mingzhu Du & Christopher Robin Bryant & Yong Li & Yuyi Wang & Han Huang, 2019. "Assessing Potential Climate Change Impacts and Adaptive Measures on Rice Yields: The Case of Zhejiang Province in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, April.
    21. Che-Chen Xu & Wen-Xiang Wu & Quan-Sheng Ge & Yang Zhou & Yu-Mei Lin & Ya-Mei Li, 2017. "Simulating climate change impacts and potential adaptations on rice yields in the Sichuan Basin, China," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 565-594, April.
    22. Attia, Ahmed & El-Hendawy, Salah & Al-Suhaibani, Nasser & Alotaibi, Majed & Tahir, Muhammad Usman & Kamal, Khaled Y., 2021. "Evaluating deficit irrigation scheduling strategies to improve yield and water productivity of maize in arid environment using simulation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paleari, Livia & Movedi, Ermes & Zoli, Michele & Burato, Andrea & Cecconi, Irene & Errahouly, Jabir & Pecollo, Eleonora & Sorvillo, Carla & Confalonieri, Roberto, 2021. "Sensitivity analysis using Morris: Just screening or an effective ranking method?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 455(C).
    2. Wu, Renye & Lawes, Roger & Oliver, Yvette & Fletcher, Andrew & Chen, Chao, 2019. "How well do we need to estimate plant-available water capacity to simulate water-limited yield potential?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 441-447.
    3. Rahn, Eric & Vaast, Philippe & Läderach, Peter & van Asten, Piet & Jassogne, Laurence & Ghazoul, Jaboury, 2018. "Exploring adaptation strategies of coffee production to climate change using a process-based model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 371(C), pages 76-89.
    4. Wang, Bingqing & Li, Yongping & Huang, Guohe & Gao, Pangpang & Liu, Jing & Wen, Yizhuo, 2023. "Development of an integrated BLSVM-MFA method for analyzing renewable power-generation potential under climate change: A case study of Xiamen," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 337(C).
    5. Zhao, Gang & Bryan, Brett A. & Song, Xiaodong, 2014. "Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of the APSIM-wheat model: Interactions between cultivar, environmental, and management parameters," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 279(C), pages 1-11.
    6. Daniel W. Gladish & Ross Darnell & Peter J. Thorburn & Bhakti Haldankar, 2019. "Emulated Multivariate Global Sensitivity Analysis for Complex Computer Models Applied to Agricultural Simulators," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 24(1), pages 130-153, March.
    7. Xenia Specka & Claas Nendel & Ralf Wieland, 2019. "Temporal Sensitivity Analysis of the MONICA Model: Application of Two Global Approaches to Analyze the Dynamics of Parameter Sensitivity," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-29, February.
    8. Lamboni, Matieyendou & Monod, Hervé & Makowski, David, 2011. "Multivariate sensitivity analysis to measure global contribution of input factors in dynamic models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(4), pages 450-459.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:103:y:2010:i:5:p:256-264. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agsy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.