IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/waterr/v15y2001i6p383-401.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrated Management of a Canal Command in a River Delta using Multi-Objective Techniques

Author

Listed:
  • R. Nayak
  • R. Panda

Abstract

Multi-criteria or multi-objective decision-making is becoming increasingly popular as a decision support tool for natural resource management.Stakeholders as well as the planners can be involved in the decision making process, using this approach. This article deals with the use of multi-criteria (multi-objective) technique in solving some complex problems related to water resource management. Five objectives were considered in the study. The benefit of combining these objective functions with the decisionsupport tool is that the management of land and water resourcescan be made more effectively. Based on this concept, a methodology was developed through this study, for the water managers and decision-makers, to obtain a compromising solutionin terms of area allocated under different crops and the magnitude of farming system variables in a canal command area. This study was under taken in the Mahanadi Delta of India. Multi-objective techniques such as Sequential Linear Fuzzy Programming and Goal Programming were used for their simplicity in computation and flexibility in application. Using Fuzzy programming technique, the objective function values under benefit maximization, production maximization, investmentminimization, labour maximization and labour minimizationwere found to be 44.26 M INR, 8795 tonnes, 42.00 M INR and548 150 man-days, respectively. These results were found tobe quite compromising in nature. Goal programming technique wasalso used to arrive at a consensus in allocation of the resources. It was used to decide the best out of the eight alternative priorities. Results indicated that only five alternative goals (Goal1, Goal2, Goal3, Goal6 and Goal8) had distinct allocations while the other three alternatives (Goal4,Goal5 and Goal7) had allocations similar to either of the abovefive alternatives irrespective of their priority levels. Croppingintensity was found to be the maximum (238%) for two of thegoals (Goal6 and Goal7). Though the results of the study were forthe specific site, the multi-criteria techniques used and therecommendations evolved are of objective nature and are applicable at any location for decision-making. Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Suggested Citation

  • R. Nayak & R. Panda, 2001. "Integrated Management of a Canal Command in a River Delta using Multi-Objective Techniques," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 15(6), pages 383-401, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:15:y:2001:i:6:p:383-401
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1015593417769
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1023/A:1015593417769
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1015593417769?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mokhtar S. Bazaraa & Aziz Bouzaher, 1981. "A Linear Goal Programming Model for Developing Economies with an Illustration from the Agricultural Sector in Egypt," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 396-413, April.
    2. Gupta, A. P. & Harboe, R. & Tabucanon, M. T., 2000. "Fuzzy multiple-criteria decision making for crop area planning in Narmada river basin," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 1-18, January.
    3. Nisar Ahamed, T. R. & Gopal Rao, K. & Murthy, J. S. R., 2000. "GIS-based fuzzy membership model for crop-land suitability analysis," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 75-95, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Singh, Ajay, 2014. "Simulation–optimization modeling for conjunctive water use management," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 23-29.
    2. U. Behera & P. Panigrahi & A. Sarangi, 2012. "Multiple Water Use Protocols in Integrated Farming System for Enhancing Productivity," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(9), pages 2605-2623, July.
    3. Mónica de Castro-Pardo & Pascual Fernández Martínez & Amelia Pérez Zabaleta & João C. Azevedo, 2021. "Dealing with Water Conflicts: A Comprehensive Review of MCDM Approaches to Manage Freshwater Ecosystem Services," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-32, April.
    4. Hajkowicz, Stefan & Higgins, Andrew, 2008. "A comparison of multiple criteria analysis techniques for water resource management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(1), pages 255-265, January.
    5. Fuxing Wang & Oliver Saavedra Valeriano & Xinguo Sun, 2013. "Near Real-Time Optimization of Multi-Reservoir during Flood Season in the Fengman Basin of China," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(12), pages 4315-4335, September.
    6. Stefan Hajkowicz & Kerry Collins, 2007. "A Review of Multiple Criteria Analysis for Water Resource Planning and Management," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 21(9), pages 1553-1566, September.
    7. Andrew Higgins & Ainsley Archer & Stefan Hajkowicz, 2008. "A Stochastic Non-linear Programming Model for a Multi-period Water Resource Allocation with Multiple Objectives," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 22(10), pages 1445-1460, October.
    8. E. Hernandez & Venkatesh Uddameri, 2010. "Selecting Agricultural Best Management Practices for Water Conservation and Quality Improvements Using Atanassov’s Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 24(15), pages 4589-4612, December.
    9. Veisi, Hadi & Deihimfard, Reza & Shahmohammadi, Alireza & Hydarzadeh, Yasoub, 2022. "Application of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in a multi-criteria selection of agricultural irrigation systems," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    10. Murat Kilic & Suer Anac, 2010. "Multi-Objective Planning Model for Large Scale Irrigation Systems: Method and Application," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 24(12), pages 3173-3194, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Moumita Palchaudhuri & Sujata Biswas, 2016. "Application of AHP with GIS in drought risk assessment for Puruliya district, India," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 84(3), pages 1905-1920, December.
    2. Saeid Hamzeh & Marzieh Mokarram & Azadeh Haratian & Harm Bartholomeus & Arend Ligtenberg & Arnold K. Bregt, 2016. "Feature Selection as a Time and Cost-Saving Approach for Land Suitability Classification (Case Study of Shavur Plain, Iran)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-13, October.
    3. Walter Musakwa, 2018. "Identifying land suitable for agricultural land reform using GIS-MCDA in South Africa," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(5), pages 2281-2299, October.
    4. Li, Y.P. & Huang, G.H. & Wang, G.Q. & Huang, Y.F., 2009. "FSWM: A hybrid fuzzy-stochastic water-management model for agricultural sustainability under uncertainty," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(12), pages 1807-1818, December.
    5. Xiaoteng Cao & Chaofu Wei & Deti Xie, 2021. "Evaluation of Scale Management Suitability Based on the Entropy-TOPSIS Method," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-17, April.
    6. Frederick Armah & Justice Odoi & Genesis Yengoh & Samuel Obiri & David Yawson & Ernest Afrifa, 2011. "Food security and climate change in drought-sensitive savanna zones of Ghana," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 291-306, March.
    7. Mohamed Rafik N. Qureshi & Ram Karan Singh & Mohd. Abul Hasan, 2018. "Decision support model to select crop pattern for sustainable agricultural practices using fuzzy MCDM," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 641-659, April.
    8. Qingsheng Li & Jinliang Huang & Cui Wang & Heshan Lin & Jiwei Zhang & Jinlong Jiang & Bingkun Wang, 2017. "Land Development Suitability Evaluation of Pingtan Island Based on Scenario Analysis and Landscape Ecological Quality Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-15, July.
    9. Zeng, Xieting & Kang, Shaozhong & Li, Fusheng & Zhang, Lu & Guo, Ping, 2010. "Fuzzy multi-objective linear programming applying to crop area planning," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 134-142, December.
    10. Reshmidevi, T.V. & Eldho, T.I. & Jana, R., 2009. "A GIS-integrated fuzzy rule-based inference system for land suitability evaluation in agricultural watersheds," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 101(1-2), pages 101-109, June.
    11. Sutardi & bector, C. R. & Goulter, Ian, 1995. "Multiobjective water resources investment planning under budgetary uncertainty and fuzzy environment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(3), pages 556-591, May.
    12. Dai, Z.Y. & Li, Y.P., 2013. "A multistage irrigation water allocation model for agricultural land-use planning under uncertainty," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 69-79.
    13. Verwaeren, Jan & Waegeman, Willem & De Baets, Bernard, 2012. "Learning partial ordinal class memberships with kernel-based proportional odds models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(4), pages 928-942.
    14. Li, Xiaojuan & Kang, Shaozhong & Niu, Jun & Du, Taisheng & Tong, Ling & Li, Sien & Ding, Risheng, 2017. "Applying uncertain programming model to improve regional farming economic benefits and water productivity," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 352-365.
    15. A J Higgins & C J Miller & A A Archer & T Ton & C S Fletcher & R R J McAllister, 2010. "Challenges of operations research practice in agricultural value chains," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(6), pages 964-973, June.
    16. Behzadi, Golnar & O’Sullivan, Michael Justin & Olsen, Tava Lennon & Zhang, Abraham, 2018. "Agribusiness supply chain risk management: A review of quantitative decision models," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 21-42.
    17. Ronja Herzberg & Tung Gia Pham & Martin Kappas & Daniel Wyss & Chau Thi Minh Tran, 2019. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for the Land Evaluation of Potential Agricultural Land Use Types in a Hilly Area of Central Vietnam," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-25, June.
    18. Sallustio, Lorenzo & Harfouche, Antoine L. & Salvati, Luca & Marchetti, Marco & Corona, Piermaria, 2022. "Evaluating the potential of marginal lands available for sustainable cellulosic biofuel production in Italy," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PB).
    19. Ananda, Jayanath & Herath, Gamini, 2009. "A critical review of multi-criteria decision making methods with special reference to forest management and planning," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(10), pages 2535-2548, August.
    20. Raj Kumar Singh & Mukunda Dev Behera & Pulakesh Das & Javed Rizvi & Shiv Kumar Dhyani & Çhandrashekhar M. Biradar, 2022. "Agroforestry Suitability for Planning Site-Specific Interventions Using Machine Learning Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:15:y:2001:i:6:p:383-401. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.