IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v56y2012i4p928-942.html

Learning partial ordinal class memberships with kernel-based proportional odds models

Author

Listed:
  • Verwaeren, Jan
  • Waegeman, Willem
  • De Baets, Bernard

Abstract

As an extension of multi-class classification, machine learning algorithms have been proposed that are able to deal with situations in which the class labels are defined in a non-crisp way. Objects exhibit in that sense a degree of membership to several classes. In a similar setting, models are developed here for classification problems where an order relation is specified on the classes (i.e., non-crisp ordinal regression problems). As for traditional (crisp) ordinal regression problems, it is argued that the order relation on the classes should be reflected by the model structure as well as the performance measure used to evaluate the model. These arguments lead to a natural extension of the well-known proportional odds model for non-crisp ordinal regression problems, in which the underlying latent variable is not necessarily restricted to the class of linear models (by using kernel methods).

Suggested Citation

  • Verwaeren, Jan & Waegeman, Willem & De Baets, Bernard, 2012. "Learning partial ordinal class memberships with kernel-based proportional odds models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(4), pages 928-942.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:56:y:2012:i:4:p:928-942
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2010.12.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947310004755
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2010.12.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Greco, Salvatore & Matarazzo, Benedetto & Slowinski, Roman, 2001. "Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(1), pages 1-47, February.
    2. Parsons, Nick R. & Costa, Matthew L. & Achten, Juul & Stallard, Nigel, 2009. "Repeated measures proportional odds logistic regression analysis of ordinal score data in the statistical software package R," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 632-641, January.
    3. J. A. Anderson & P. R. Philips, 1981. "Regression, Discrimination and Measurement Models for Ordered Categorical Variables," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 30(1), pages 22-31, March.
    4. Mithat Gonen & Glenn Heller, 2005. "Concordance probability and discriminatory power in proportional hazards regression," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 92(4), pages 965-970, December.
    5. Waegeman, Willem & De Baets, Bernard & Boullart, Luc, 2008. "On the scalability of ordered multi-class ROC analysis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(7), pages 3371-3388, March.
    6. Mouton, Ans M. & De Baets, Bernard & Van Broekhoven, Ester & Goethals, Peter L.M., 2009. "Prevalence-adjusted optimisation of fuzzy models for species distribution," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(15), pages 1776-1786.
    7. S. Lievens & B. De Baets & K. Cao-Van, 2008. "A probabilistic framework for the design of instance-based supervised ranking algorithms in an ordinal setting," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 163(1), pages 115-142, October.
    8. Grigorios Tsoumakas & Ioannis Katakis, 2007. "Multi-Label Classification: An Overview," International Journal of Data Warehousing and Mining (IJDWM), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 3(3), pages 1-13, July.
    9. Tutz, Gerhard & Hennevogl, Wolfgang, 1996. "Random effects in ordinal regression models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 537-557, September.
    10. Nisar Ahamed, T. R. & Gopal Rao, K. & Murthy, J. S. R., 2000. "GIS-based fuzzy membership model for crop-land suitability analysis," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 75-95, February.
    11. Doring, Christian & Lesot, Marie-Jeanne & Kruse, Rudolf, 2006. "Data analysis with fuzzy clustering methods," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 192-214, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shengxue Zhu & Ke Wang & Chongyi Li, 2021. "Crash Injury Severity Prediction Using an Ordinal Classification Machine Learning Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-20, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wen-Min Lu & Qian Long Kweh & Chung-Wei Wang, 2021. "Integration and application of rough sets and data envelopment analysis for assessments of the investment trusts industry," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 296(1), pages 163-194, January.
    2. Hartzel, Jonathan & Liu, I-Ming & Agresti, Alan, 2001. "Describing heterogeneous effects in stratified ordinal contingency tables, with application to multi-center clinical trials," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 429-449, February.
    3. Ficko, Andrej & Boncina, Andrej, 2013. "Probabilistic typology of management decision making in private forest properties," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 34-43.
    4. Schmid, Matthias & Tutz, Gerhard & Welchowski, Thomas, 2018. "Discrimination measures for discrete time-to-event predictions," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 7(C), pages 153-164.
    5. Tomasz Lenartowicz & Henryk Bujak & Marcin Przystalski & Inna Mashevska & Kamila Nowosad & Krzysztof Jończyk & Beata Feledyn-Szewczyk, 2024. "Assessment of Resistance of Barley Varieties to Diseases in Polish Organic Field Trials," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-11, May.
    6. Zhou, Fanyin & Fu, Lijun & Li, Zhiyong & Xu, Jiawei, 2022. "The recurrence of financial distress: A survival analysis," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 1100-1115.
    7. Hamid Bekamiri & Daniel S. Hain & Roman Jurowetzki, 2021. "PatentSBERTa: A Deep NLP based Hybrid Model for Patent Distance and Classification using Augmented SBERT," Papers 2103.11933, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2021.
    8. Charmaine Pei Ling Lee & Hyungwon Choi & Khee Chee Soo & Min-Han Tan & Wen Yee Chay & Kee Seng Chia & Jenny Liu & Jingmei Li & Mikael Hartman, 2015. "Mammographic Breast Density and Common Genetic Variants in Breast Cancer Risk Prediction," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-16, September.
    9. Renaud, J. & Thibault, J. & Lanouette, R. & Kiss, L.N. & Zaras, K. & Fonteix, C., 2007. "Comparison of two multicriteria decision aid methods: Net Flow and Rough Set Methods in a high yield pulping process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(3), pages 1418-1432, March.
    10. Pang, Jifang & Liang, Jiye, 2012. "Evaluation of the results of multi-attribute group decision-making with linguistic information," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 294-301.
    11. Bous, Géraldine & Fortemps, Philippe & Glineur, François & Pirlot, Marc, 2010. "ACUTA: A novel method for eliciting additive value functions on the basis of holistic preference statements," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(2), pages 435-444, October.
    12. Lejeune, Miguel & Lozin, Vadim & Lozina, Irina & Ragab, Ahmed & Yacout, Soumaya, 2019. "Recent advances in the theory and practice of Logical Analysis of Data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(1), pages 1-15.
    13. Eduardo Fernández & José Rui Figueira & Jorge Navarro, 2023. "A theoretical look at ordinal classification methods based on comparing actions with limiting boundaries between adjacent classes," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(2), pages 819-843, June.
    14. Doumpos, M. & Marinakis, Y. & Marinaki, M. & Zopounidis, C., 2009. "An evolutionary approach to construction of outranking models for multicriteria classification: The case of the ELECTRE TRI method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(2), pages 496-505, December.
    15. Paul S. Albert, 2007. "Random Effects Modeling Approaches for Estimating ROC Curves from Repeated Ordinal Tests without a Gold Standard," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(2), pages 593-602, June.
    16. Domenico Piccolo & Rosaria Simone, 2019. "The class of cub models: statistical foundations, inferential issues and empirical evidence," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 28(3), pages 389-435, September.
    17. Chaker Jebari, 2016. "Multi-Label Genre Classification of Web Pages Using an Adaptive Centroid-Based Classifier," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(01), pages 1-21, March.
    18. Pekka Korhonen & Majid Soleimani-damaneh & Jyrki Wallenius, 2017. "The use of quasi-concave value functions in MCDM: some theoretical results," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 86(2), pages 367-375, October.
    19. Skorupski, Jacek & Uchroński, Piotr, 2017. "A fuzzy model for evaluating metal detection equipment at airport security screening checkpoints," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 39-48.
    20. Yuqi Tian & Bryan E. Shepherd & Chun Li & Donglin Zeng & Jonathan S. Schildcrout, 2023. "Analyzing clustered continuous response variables with ordinal regression models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 3764-3777, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:56:y:2012:i:4:p:928-942. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.