IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v52y2018i2d10.1007_s11135-018-0697-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A novel method as a diagnostic tool for the detection of influential observations in the Cox proportional hazards model

Author

Listed:
  • Nuriye Sancar

    (Near East University)

  • Deniz Inan

    (Marmara University)

Abstract

It is important that the process of studying and modelling the prognosis of disability should be conducted using time-to-event data, as the dynamic nature of disability could cause intervention on the modifiable (prognostic) factors, thus changing the course to a more favourable outcome. In disability research, the Cox PH model is frequently used to identify prognostic factors for the life expectancy of people with disabilities and to evaluate the treatment effects on the time to event. Accurate detection of influential observations is an important factor when fitting the Cox PH model, as influential observations in the Cox PH model can cause model misspecification, inaccurately determined factors, missed valuable biological information and/or violation of the proportional hazard assumption. In this paper, a novel multiple case detection method for influential observations is recommended in the Cox model. The aim of the paper is to inform clinicians and researchers who use the Cox PH model for describing the survival time as a function of multiple prognostic factors, regarding the importance of the detection of influential observations that can lead to misleading conclusions if they are present in the data set. The efficiency of the proposed method is presented through the real dataset. Additionally, in the specific case of North Cyprus, the aim is emphasize the importance of survival modelling studies that determine the prognostic factors affecting the lives of people with disabilities, to improve life quality and to develop a plan for healthier and higher quality life styles programmes for people with disabilities. As a first step, it is recommended that a system of database records of disabilities should be established and maintained by the government to raise public awareness.

Suggested Citation

  • Nuriye Sancar & Deniz Inan, 2018. "A novel method as a diagnostic tool for the detection of influential observations in the Cox proportional hazards model," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 1253-1266, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:52:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s11135-018-0697-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-018-0697-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-018-0697-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-018-0697-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mithat Gonen & Glenn Heller, 2005. "Concordance probability and discriminatory power in proportional hazards regression," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 92(4), pages 965-970, December.
    2. Majer, I.M. & Nusselder, W.J. & Mackenbach, J.P. & Klijs, B. & Van Baal, P.H.M., 2011. "Mortality risk associated with disability: A population-based record linkage study," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 101(12), pages 9-15.
    3. Alessandra Nardi & Michael Schemper, 1999. "New Residuals for Cox Regression and Their Application to Outlier Screening," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 55(2), pages 523-529, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lin Lu & Laurent Dercle & Binsheng Zhao & Lawrence H. Schwartz, 2021. "Deep learning for the prediction of early on-treatment response in metastatic colorectal cancer from serial medical imaging," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Irene Albarrán Lozano & Pablo J. Alonso-González & José Javier Núñez-Velázquez, 2021. "Estimation of Life Expectancy for Dependent Population in a Multi-State Context," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-13, October.
    3. Chrianna I Bharat & Kevin Murray & Edward Cripps & Melinda R Hodkiewicz, 2018. "Methods for displaying and calibration of Cox proportional hazards models," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(1), pages 105-115, February.
    4. Napsu Karmitsa & Kaisa Joki & Antti Airola & Tapio Pahikkala, 2025. "Limited memory bundle DC algorithm for sparse pairwise kernel learning," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 92(1), pages 55-85, May.
    5. J. Iñaki De La Peña & M. Cristina Fernández-Ramos & Asier Garayeta & Iratxe D. Martín, 2022. "Transforming Private Pensions: An Actuarial Model to Face Long-Term Costs," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, March.
    6. Steven A. Haas & Katsuya Oi & Zhangjun Zhou, 2017. "The Life Course, Cohort Dynamics, and International Differences in Aging Trajectories," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 54(6), pages 2043-2071, December.
    7. Olga Grigoriev & Gabriele Doblhammer, 2022. "Does the Mortality of Individuals with Severe Disabilities Contribute to the Persistent East–West Mortality Gap Among German Men?," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 38(2), pages 247-271, May.
    8. Arno Botha & Tanja Verster & Bernard Scheepers, 2025. "Towards modelling lifetime default risk: Exploring different subtypes of recurrent event Cox-regression models," Papers 2505.01044, arXiv.org.
    9. Ruosha Li & Jing Ning & Ziding Feng, 2022. "Estimation and inference of predictive discrimination for survival outcome risk prediction models," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 219-240, April.
    10. Saskia Groot & Irene Santi & Pieter Bakx & Bram Wouterse & Pieter Baal, 2023. "Informal Care Costs According to Age and Proximity to Death to Support Cost-Effectiveness Analyses," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 41(9), pages 1137-1149, September.
    11. Durdu Karasoy & Nuray Tuncer, 2015. "Outliers in Survival Analysis," Alphanumeric Journal, Bahadir Fatih Yildirim, vol. 3(2), pages 139-152, December.
    12. Shengli An & Peter Zhang & Hong-Bin Fang, 2023. "Subgroup Identification in Survival Outcome Data Based on Concordance Probability Measurement," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-10, June.
    13. Sanjoy K. Sinha, 2019. "Robust estimation in accelerated failure time models," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 52-78, January.
    14. Wolf, Petra & Schmidt, Georg & Ulm, Kurt, 2011. "The use of ROC for defining the validity of the prognostic index in censored data," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 81(7), pages 783-791, July.
    15. Richard D Hayes & Chin-Kuo Chang & Andrea C Fernandes & Aysha Begum & David To & Matthew Broadbent & Matthew Hotopf & Robert Stewart, 2012. "Functional Status and All-Cause Mortality in Serious Mental Illness," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-9, September.
    16. Glenn Heller & Qianxing Mo, 2016. "Estimating the concordance probability in a survival analysis with a discrete number of risk groups," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 263-279, April.
    17. Verwaeren, Jan & Waegeman, Willem & De Baets, Bernard, 2012. "Learning partial ordinal class memberships with kernel-based proportional odds models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(4), pages 928-942.
    18. Elena Fabrizi & Alessio Farcomeni & Valerio Gatta, 2012. "Modelling work history patterns in the Italian labour market," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 21(2), pages 227-247, June.
    19. Zhou, Fanyin & Fu, Lijun & Li, Zhiyong & Xu, Jiawei, 2022. "The recurrence of financial distress: A survival analysis," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 1100-1115.
    20. Arazmuradov, Annageldy, 2016. "Assessing sovereign debt default by efficiency," The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, Elsevier, vol. 13(C), pages 100-113.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:52:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s11135-018-0697-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.