IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/lifeda/v25y2019i1d10.1007_s10985-018-9421-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robust estimation in accelerated failure time models

Author

Listed:
  • Sanjoy K. Sinha

    (Carleton University)

Abstract

The accelerated failure time model is widely used for analyzing censored survival times often observed in clinical studies. It is well-known that the ordinary maximum likelihood estimators of the parameters in the accelerated failure time model are generally sensitive to potential outliers or small deviations from the underlying distributional assumptions. In this paper, we propose and explore a robust method for fitting the accelerated failure time model to survival data by bounding the influence of outliers in both the outcome variable and associated covariates. We also develop a sandwich-type variance–covariance function for approximating the variances of the proposed robust estimators. The finite-sample properties of the estimators are investigated based on empirical results from an extensive simulation study. An application is provided using actual data from a clinical study of primary breast cancer patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanjoy K. Sinha, 2019. "Robust estimation in accelerated failure time models," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 52-78, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:lifeda:v:25:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10985-018-9421-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10985-018-9421-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10985-018-9421-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10985-018-9421-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Locatelli, Isabella & Marazzi, Alfio & Yohai, Victor J., 2011. "Robust accelerated failure time regression," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 874-887, January.
    2. Cantoni E. & Ronchetti E., 2001. "Robust Inference for Generalized Linear Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 1022-1030, September.
    3. Alessandra Nardi & Michael Schemper, 1999. "New Residuals for Cox Regression and Their Application to Outlier Screening," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 55(2), pages 523-529, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adam Braima S. Mastor & Abdulaziz S. Alghamdi & Oscar Ngesa & Joseph Mung’atu & Christophe Chesneau & Ahmed Z. Afify, 2023. "The Extended Exponential-Weibull Accelerated Failure Time Model with Application to Sudan COVID-19 Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-26, January.
    2. Jad Beyhum & Ingrid Keilegom, 2023. "Robust censored regression with $$\ell _1$$ ℓ 1 -norm regularization," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 32(1), pages 146-162, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bianco, Ana M. & Martínez, Elena, 2009. "Robust testing in the logistic regression model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(12), pages 4095-4105, October.
    2. Nuriye Sancar & Deniz Inan, 2018. "A novel method as a diagnostic tool for the detection of influential observations in the Cox proportional hazards model," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 1253-1266, December.
    3. Lô, Serigne N. & Ronchetti, Elvezio, 2009. "Robust and accurate inference for generalized linear models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(9), pages 2126-2136, October.
    4. Giulia Romano & Nicola Salvati & Andrea Guerrini, 2014. "Factors Affecting Water Utility Companies’ Decision to Promote the Reduction of Household Water Consumption," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(15), pages 5491-5505, December.
    5. Andrea A. Naghi & Máté Váradi & Mikhail Zhelonkin, 2021. "Robust Estimation of Probit Models with Endogeneity," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 21-004/III, Tinbergen Institute.
    6. Miron, Julien & Poilane, Benjamin & Cantoni, Eva, 2022. "Robust polytomous logistic regression," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    7. Hill, Jonathan B. & Prokhorov, Artem, 2016. "GEL estimation for heavy-tailed GARCH models with robust empirical likelihood inference," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 190(1), pages 18-45.
    8. Fiaschi, Davide & Giuliani, Elisa & Nieri, Federica & Salvati, Nicola, 2020. "How bad is your company? Measuring corporate wrongdoing beyond the magic of ESG metrics," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 287-299.
    9. Ricardo A. Maronna & Victor J. Yohai, 2021. "Optimal robust estimators for families of distributions on the integers," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(5), pages 2269-2281, October.
    10. Graciela Boente & Daniela Rodriguez & Pablo Vena, 2020. "Robust estimators in a generalized partly linear regression model under monotony constraints," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 29(1), pages 50-89, March.
    11. Neykov, N.M. & Filzmoser, P. & Neytchev, P.N., 2012. "Robust joint modeling of mean and dispersion through trimming," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 34-48, January.
    12. Paolo Frumento & Nicola Salvati, 2021. "Parametric modeling of quantile regression coefficient functions with count data," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 30(4), pages 1237-1258, October.
    13. Krichene, H. & Geiger, T. & Frieler, K. & Willner, S.N. & Sauer, I. & Otto, C., 2021. "Long-term impacts of tropical cyclones and fluvial floods on economic growth – Empirical evidence on transmission channels at different levels of development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    14. Dragos C Petrescu & Gareth J Hollands & Dominique-Laurent Couturier & Yin-Lam Ng & Theresa M Marteau, 2016. "Public Acceptability in the UK and USA of Nudging to Reduce Obesity: The Example of Reducing Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Consumption," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, June.
    15. Cantoni, Eva & Ronchetti, Elvezio, 2006. "A robust approach for skewed and heavy-tailed outcomes in the analysis of health care expenditures," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 198-213, March.
    16. Jad Beyhum & Ingrid Keilegom, 2023. "Robust censored regression with $$\ell _1$$ ℓ 1 -norm regularization," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 32(1), pages 146-162, March.
    17. Stoklosa, Jakub & Huggins, Richard M., 2012. "A robust P-spline approach to closed population capture–recapture models with time dependence and heterogeneity," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 408-417.
    18. Bianco, Ana M. & Boente, Graciela & Rodrigues, Isabel M., 2013. "Robust tests in generalized linear models with missing responses," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 80-97.
    19. Farcomeni, Alessio & Nardi, Alessandra, 2010. "A two-component Weibull mixture to model early and late mortality in a Bayesian framework," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 416-428, February.
    20. Zhang, Yuexia & Qin, Guoyou & Zhu, Zhongyi & Xu, Wanghong, 2019. "A novel robust approach for analysis of longitudinal data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 83-95.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:lifeda:v:25:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10985-018-9421-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.