IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i7p1292-d105715.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land Development Suitability Evaluation of Pingtan Island Based on Scenario Analysis and Landscape Ecological Quality Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Qingsheng Li

    (Third Institute of Oceanography, State Oceanic Administration, Xiamen 361005, China)

  • Jinliang Huang

    (Coastal and Ocean Management Institute, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China)

  • Cui Wang

    (Third Institute of Oceanography, State Oceanic Administration, Xiamen 361005, China)

  • Heshan Lin

    (Island Research Center, State Oceanic Administration, Pingtan 350400, China)

  • Jiwei Zhang

    (Third Institute of Oceanography, State Oceanic Administration, Xiamen 361005, China)

  • Jinlong Jiang

    (Third Institute of Oceanography, State Oceanic Administration, Xiamen 361005, China)

  • Bingkun Wang

    (Third Institute of Oceanography, State Oceanic Administration, Xiamen 361005, China)

Abstract

With the acceleration of urbanization and industrialization, regional development is becoming increasingly disordered. Thus, how to balance economic development and ecological protection is a key question. To comprehensively evaluate land development suitability, an evaluation index system for construction land and farmland suitability was established in this study based on natural and social-economic information. After selecting an island in China as the main case study in this work, the reference method was applied in grading and value assigning for all indices. In addition, the analytic hierarchy process and expert evaluation method were used to determine the index weighting. After scenario analysis was adopted in the study to analyze the impact of the policy orientation on the suitability evaluation, we finally evaluated the landscape ecological quality of different scenarios. Results showed the landscape ecological quality of a coordinated development scenario was the highest. The results indicated that coordinated development which takes the ecological protection and urban development into account may be a better choice for land planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Qingsheng Li & Jinliang Huang & Cui Wang & Heshan Lin & Jiwei Zhang & Jinlong Jiang & Bingkun Wang, 2017. "Land Development Suitability Evaluation of Pingtan Island Based on Scenario Analysis and Landscape Ecological Quality Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-15, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:7:p:1292-:d:105715
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/7/1292/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/7/1292/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas L. Saaty, 1990. "An Exposition of the AHP in Reply to the Paper "Remarks on the Analytic Hierarchy Process"," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(3), pages 259-268, March.
    2. Arán Carrión, J. & Espín Estrella, A. & Aznar Dols, F. & Zamorano Toro, M. & Rodríguez, M. & Ramos Ridao, A., 2008. "Environmental decision-support systems for evaluating the carrying capacity of land areas: Optimal site selection for grid-connected photovoltaic power plants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 12(9), pages 2358-2380, December.
    3. Nisar Ahamed, T. R. & Gopal Rao, K. & Murthy, J. S. R., 2000. "GIS-based fuzzy membership model for crop-land suitability analysis," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 75-95, February.
    4. Zhang, Jianjun & Fu, Meichen & Zhang, Zhongya & Tao, Jin & Fu, Wei, 2014. "A trade-off approach of optimal land allocation between socio-economic development and ecological stability," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 272(C), pages 175-187.
    5. Reshmidevi, T.V. & Eldho, T.I. & Jana, R., 2009. "A GIS-integrated fuzzy rule-based inference system for land suitability evaluation in agricultural watersheds," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 101(1-2), pages 101-109, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qing’e Wang & Mengmeng Su & Lei Zeng & Huihua Chen, 2022. "A New Method to Assist Decision-Making of Water Environmental Emergency in Expressway Region," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-19, August.
    2. Weiheng Zheng & Feng Cai & Shenliang Chen & Jun Zhu & Hongshuai Qi & Shaohua Zhao & Jianhui Liu, 2020. "Ecological Suitability of Island Development Based on Ecosystem Services Value, Biocapacity and Ecological Footprint: A Case Study of Pingtan Island, Fujian, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Zhiming Li & Zhengxi Fan & Shiguang Shen, 2018. "Urban Green Space Suitability Evaluation Based on the AHP-CV Combined Weight Method: A Case Study of Fuping County, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-15, July.
    4. Aijun Liu & Haiyang Liu & Sang-Bing Tsai & Hui Lu & Xiao Zhang & Jiangtao Wang, 2018. "Using a Hybrid Model on Joint Scheduling of Berths and Quay Cranes—From a Sustainable Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-15, June.
    5. Yue Chen & Qikang Zhong & Bo Li, 2023. "Positive or Negative Viewpoint Determines the Overall Scenic Beauty of a Scene: A Landscape Perception Evaluation Based on a Panoramic View," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-23, July.
    6. Erda Wang & Nannan Kang & Yang Yu, 2017. "Valuing Urban Landscape Using Subjective Well-Being Data: Empirical Evidence from Dalian, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. An Thinh Nguyen & Van Hanh Ta & Van Hong Nguyen & Anh Tuan Pham & Mélie Monnerat & Luc Hens, 2022. "Shifting challenges for Cinnamomum cassia production in the mountains of Northern Vietnam: spatial analysis combined with semi-structured interviews," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 7213-7235, May.
    2. Suddhasil Bose & Subhra Halder, 2023. "Identification of crop suitable land using geospatial techniques and assessment with socio-economic factors—case study from India," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 229-253, March.
    3. Pilehforooshha, Parastoo & Karimi, Mohammad & Taleai, Mohammad, 2014. "A GIS-based agricultural land-use allocation model coupling increase and decrease in land demand," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 116-125.
    4. Vrînceanu, Alexandra & Dumitrașcu, Monica & Kucsicsa, Gheorghe, 2022. "Site suitability for photovoltaic farms and current investment in Romania," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 320-330.
    5. Mrinmay Mandal & Nilanjana Das Chatterjee, 2021. "Geospatial approach-based delineation of elephant habitat suitability zones and its consequence in Mayurjharna Elephant Reserve, India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(12), pages 17788-17809, December.
    6. Bingkui Qiu & Shasha Lu & Min Zhou & Lu Zhang & Yu Deng & Ci Song & Zuo Zhang, 2015. "A Hybrid Inexact Optimization Method for Land-Use Allocation in Association with Environmental/Ecological Requirements at a Watershed Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-25, April.
    7. Moumita Palchaudhuri & Sujata Biswas, 2016. "Application of AHP with GIS in drought risk assessment for Puruliya district, India," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 84(3), pages 1905-1920, December.
    8. Madjid Tavana & Mariya Sodenkamp & Leena Suhl, 2010. "A soft multi-criteria decision analysis model with application to the European Union enlargement," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 393-421, December.
    9. Finn, Thomas & McKenzie, Paul, 2020. "A high-resolution suitability index for solar farm location in complex landscapes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 520-533.
    10. Toledo, Olga Moraes & Oliveira Filho, Delly & Diniz, Antônia Sônia Alves Cardoso, 2010. "Distributed photovoltaic generation and energy storage systems: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 506-511, January.
    11. Sudhakar Yedla & Ram M. Shrestha, 2007. "Application of analytic hierarchy process to prioritize urban transport options: Comparative analysis of group aggregation methods," Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai Working Papers 2007-011, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, India.
    12. Raj Kumar Singh & Mukunda Dev Behera & Pulakesh Das & Javed Rizvi & Shiv Kumar Dhyani & Çhandrashekhar M. Biradar, 2022. "Agroforestry Suitability for Planning Site-Specific Interventions Using Machine Learning Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, April.
    13. Lee, Heeseok & Shi, Yong & Nazem, Sufi M. & Yeol Kang, Sung & Ho Park, Tae & Ho Sohn, Myung, 2001. "Multicriteria hub decision making for rural area telecommunication networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(3), pages 483-495, September.
    14. Dias, Luís & Gouveia, João Pedro & Lourenço, Paulo & Seixas, Júlia, 2019. "Interplay between the potential of photovoltaic systems and agricultural land use," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 725-735.
    15. Yong Zeng & Yanpeng Cai & Guohe Huang & Jing Dai, 2011. "A Review on Optimization Modeling of Energy Systems Planning and GHG Emission Mitigation under Uncertainty," Energies, MDPI, vol. 4(10), pages 1-33, October.
    16. Indrajit Pal & Sankar Nath & Khemraj Shukla & Dilip Pal & Abhishek Raj & K. Thingbaijam & B. Bansal, 2008. "Earthquake hazard zonation of Sikkim Himalaya using a GIS platform," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 45(3), pages 333-377, June.
    17. Shukui Tan & Lu Zhang & Min Zhou & Yanan Li & Siliang Wang & Bing Kuang & Xiang Luo, 2017. "A hybrid mathematical model for urban land-use planning in association with environmental–ecological consideration under uncertainty," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 44(1), pages 54-79, January.
    18. Joaquín Pérez, José L. Jimeno, Ethel Mokotoff, 2001. "Another potential strong shortcoming of AHP," Doctorado en Economía- documentos de trabajo 8/02, Programa de doctorado en Economía. Universidad de Alcalá., revised 01 Jun 2002.
    19. Boukherroub, Tasseda & LeBel, Luc & Ruiz, Angel, 2017. "A framework for sustainable forest resource allocation: A Canadian case study," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 66(PB), pages 224-235.
    20. Jain, Bharat A. & Nag, Barin N., 1996. "A decision-support model for investment decisions in new ventures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 90(3), pages 473-486, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:7:p:1292-:d:105715. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.