IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/snbeco/v5y2025i10d10.1007_s43546-025-00903-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Disrupting cognitive capacity through excessive technology use among academic staff: examining technostress, ethical decision-making, emotional exhaustion, and ethical climate

Author

Listed:
  • Prince Addai

    (Ghana Communication Technology University)

  • Eric Delle

    (University of Ghana)

  • Isaac Okyere

    (Ghana Communication Technology University)

  • Richard Amponsah

    (Ghana Communication Technology University)

  • Sena Esi Govina

    (Ghana Communication Technology University)

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of technostress among academic staff has raised concerns regarding its impact on ethical decision-making. While extant research has explored the antecedents and consequences of technostress, limited attention has been given to the mechanisms through which it influences ethical decision-making. Specifically, the mediating role of emotional exhaustion in this nexus remains underexplored, as does the extent to which ethical climate moderates the potential mediation effect. Therefore, this study investigates emotional exhaustion as an underlying mechanism in the linkage between technostress and ethical decision-making while examining ethical climate as a boundary condition in the mediated relationship in Ghana. A total of 408 academic staff members were selected using a convenience sampling approach. The participants completed the anonymous and confidential survey once. Process Macro was employed to assess the proposed relationships. The findings revealed a positive correlation between technostress and ethical decision-making among academic staff. Additionally, emotional exhaustion mediated this relationship. Furthermore, ethical climate moderated the mediated effect, with a strong ethical climate reducing the negative impact of emotional exhaustion on ethical decision-making. This paper contributes to the growing body of knowledge on technostress by integrating emotional exhaustion and ethical climate as key factors influencing ethical decision-making among academic staff. It is among the first to examine the interaction between technostress, emotional exhaustion, ethical climate, and personal ethical decision-making within the academic profession in the African context.

Suggested Citation

  • Prince Addai & Eric Delle & Isaac Okyere & Richard Amponsah & Sena Esi Govina, 2025. "Disrupting cognitive capacity through excessive technology use among academic staff: examining technostress, ethical decision-making, emotional exhaustion, and ethical climate," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 5(10), pages 1-20, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:snbeco:v:5:y:2025:i:10:d:10.1007_s43546-025-00903-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s43546-025-00903-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s43546-025-00903-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s43546-025-00903-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Angela J. Xu & Raymond Loi & Hang-yue Ngo, 2016. "Ethical Leadership Behavior and Employee Justice Perceptions: The Mediating Role of Trust in Organization," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 134(3), pages 493-504, March.
    2. Singh, Pallavi & Bala, Hillol & Dey, Bidit Lal & Filieri, Raffaele, 2022. "Enforced remote working: The impact of digital platform-induced stress and remote working experience on technology exhaustion and subjective wellbeing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 269-286.
    3. Chiara Ghislieri & Domenico Sanseverino & Valentina Dolce & Paola Spagnoli & Amelia Manuti & Emanuela Ingusci & Tindara Addabbo, 2023. "Emotional Exhaustion and Engagement in Higher Education Students during a Crisis, Lessons Learned from COVID-19 Experience in Italian Universities," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, February.
    4. Connor, Gregory & Korajczyk, Robert A, 1993. "A Test for the Number of Factors in an Approximate Factor Model," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 48(4), pages 1263-1291, September.
    5. Bora Ly & Romny Ly, 2024. "Technostress in times of change: unveiling the impact of leadership styles in Cambodia’s public organizations in the wake of COVID-19," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 2331645-233, December.
    6. Karin Lasthuizen & Kamal Badar, 2023. "Ethical Reasoning at Work: A Cross-Country Comparison of Gender and Age Differences," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, May.
    7. repec:eme:ijlma0:ijlma-03-2017-0053 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Hyewon Lee & Saemi An & Ga Young Lim & Young Woo Sohn, 2021. "Ethical Leadership and Followers’ Emotional Exhaustion: Exploring the Roles of Three Types of Emotional Labor toward Leaders in South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-13, October.
    9. Hans Baumgartner & Bert Weijters & Rik Pieters, 2021. "The biasing effect of common method variance: some clarifications," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 221-235, March.
    10. Carlos Santiago-Torner & José-Antonio Corral-Marfil & Elisenda Tarrats-Pons, 2024. "Relationship between Personal Ethics and Burnout: The Unexpected Influence of Affective Commitment," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-19, June.
    11. Chiara Consiglio & Nicoletta Massa & Valentina Sommovigo & Luigi Fusco, 2023. "Techno-Stress Creators, Burnout and Psychological Health among Remote Workers during the Pandemic: The Moderating Role of E-Work Self-Efficacy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(22), pages 1-23, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. GUO-FITOUSSI, Liang, 2013. "A Comparison of the Finite Sample Properties of Selection Rules of Factor Numbers in Large Datasets," MPRA Paper 50005, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Claudio Morana, 2014. "Factor Vector Autoregressive Estimation of Heteroskedastic Persistent and Non Persistent Processes Subject to Structural Breaks," Working Papers 273, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics, revised May 2014.
    3. Susana Iglesias Antelo & Jean-Pierre Levy Mangin, 2010. "An analysis of the risk-return relationship in the Spanish capital market using a structural equation model," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(14), pages 1397-1403.
    4. Kurt T. Dirks & Patrick J. Sweeney & Nikolaos Dimotakis & Todd Woodruff, 2022. "Understanding the Change and Development of Trust and the Implications for New Leaders," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(2), pages 711-730, October.
    5. Kim, Hyun Hak & Swanson, Norman R., 2018. "Mining big data using parsimonious factor, machine learning, variable selection and shrinkage methods," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 339-354.
    6. Alain-Philippe Fortin & Patrick Gagliardini & O. Scaillet, 2022. "Eigenvalue tests for the number of latent factors in short panels," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 22-81, Swiss Finance Institute.
    7. Catherine Doz & Domenico Giannone & Lucrezia Reichlin, 2012. "A Quasi–Maximum Likelihood Approach for Large, Approximate Dynamic Factor Models," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 94(4), pages 1014-1024, November.
    8. Thuy-Van Tran & Sinikka Lepistö & Janne Järvinen, 2021. "The relationship between subjectivity in managerial performance evaluation and the three dimensions of justice perception," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 369-399, September.
    9. Fan, Jianqing & Liao, Yuan & Shi, Xiaofeng, 2015. "Risks of large portfolios," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 186(2), pages 367-387.
    10. Norman R. Swanson & Nii Ayi Armah, 2011. "Diffusion Index Models and Index Proxies: Recent Results and New Directions," Departmental Working Papers 201114, Rutgers University, Department of Economics.
    11. Massacci, Daniele, 2017. "Least squares estimation of large dimensional threshold factor models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 197(1), pages 101-129.
    12. Olivier Ledoit & Michael Wolf, 2003. "Honey, I shrunk the sample covariance matrix," Economics Working Papers 691, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    13. Bai, Jushan & Ando, Tomohiro, 2013. "Multifactor asset pricing with a large number of observable risk factors and unobservable common and group-specific factors," MPRA Paper 52785, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Dec 2013.
    14. Jushan Bai & Serena Ng, 2020. "Simpler Proofs for Approximate Factor Models of Large Dimensions," Papers 2008.00254, arXiv.org.
    15. Carole Bernard & Ludger Rüschendorf & Steven Vanduffel & Ruodu Wang, 2017. "Risk bounds for factor models," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 631-659, July.
    16. Connor, Gregory & Linton, Oliver, 2007. "Semiparametric estimation of a characteristic-based factor model of common stock returns," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 14(5), pages 694-717, December.
    17. Martin Lettau & Markus Pelger & Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh, 2020. "Factors That Fit the Time Series and Cross-Section of Stock Returns," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 33(5), pages 2274-2325.
    18. Goyal, Amit & Pérignon, Christophe & Villa, Christophe, 2008. "How common are common return factors across the NYSE and Nasdaq?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(3), pages 252-271, December.
    19. Linton, Oliver & Xiao, Zhijie, 2019. "Efficient estimation of nonparametric regression in the presence of dynamic heteroskedasticity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 213(2), pages 608-631.
    20. Leger, Lawrence & Leone, Vitor, 2008. "Changes in the risk structure of stock returns: Consumer Confidence and the dotcom bubble," Review of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 228-244, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:snbeco:v:5:y:2025:i:10:d:10.1007_s43546-025-00903-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.