IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/snbeco/v4y2024i3d10.1007_s43546-024-00624-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Creating an optimal electric vehicle ecosystem: an investigation of electric vehicle stakeholders and ecosystem trends in the US

Author

Listed:
  • Phillip K. Agbesi

    (North Carolina State University)

  • Rico Ruffino

    (North Carolina State University)

  • Marko Hakovirta

    (North Carolina State University)

Abstract

Electric vehicles (EVs) are a key transportation alternative that can help reduce tailpipe emissions associated with internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEV). The overall emphasis on sustainability, energy independence, and rapid technological advancement has influenced the US to set targets to increase EV adoption. This study investigates emerging technologies within the EV ecosystem, including those likely to take precedence, phase out, or require strengthening. In pursuit of comprehensive insights, we gathered stakeholders' perspectives on current and future EV ecosystem trends targeting different facets of the ecosystem. Existing EV surveys often center on specific issues, such as charging infrastructure, purchasing intentions, or battery swapping. However, no literature has comprehensively examined stakeholders’ perspectives on various dimensions of the EV ecosystem. To address this gap, we conducted a survey using SurveyMonkey, an online survey tool employing a purposive sampling technique to target stakeholders within the EV ecosystem. The results of this survey highlight several key findings. Stakeholders express a strong preference for alternatives to traditional plugin charging methods. In addition, cybersecurity emerges as a paramount concern, underscoring the critical need to address potential vulnerabilities in EV systems. This study highlights obstacles and possible pathways for developing the EV ecosystem. Moreover, these insights can guide policymakers, industry leaders, and researchers to shape effective strategies and regulations. By incorporating stakeholder perspectives and leveraging emerging technologies, the EV ecosystem can be fortified to accelerate widespread EV adoption and meet sustainability goals. Finally, this study paves the way for more comprehensive research, including in-person interviews.

Suggested Citation

  • Phillip K. Agbesi & Rico Ruffino & Marko Hakovirta, 2024. "Creating an optimal electric vehicle ecosystem: an investigation of electric vehicle stakeholders and ecosystem trends in the US," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 4(3), pages 1-36, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:snbeco:v:4:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s43546-024-00624-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s43546-024-00624-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s43546-024-00624-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s43546-024-00624-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jung, Seung Hwan & Feng, Tianjun, 2020. "Government subsidies for green technology development under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(2), pages 726-739.
    2. Zhou, Kaile & Cheng, Lexin & Lu, Xinhui & Wen, Lulu, 2020. "Scheduling model of electric vehicles charging considering inconvenience and dynamic electricity prices," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    3. Koichiro Ito, 2014. "Do Consumers Respond to Marginal or Average Price? Evidence from Nonlinear Electricity Pricing," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(2), pages 537-563, February.
    4. Rahul Kapoor, 2018. "Ecosystems: broadening the locus of value creation," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 7(1), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Santos, Georgina & Davies, Huw, 2020. "Incentives for quick penetration of electric vehicles in five European countries: Perceptions from experts and stakeholders," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 326-342.
    6. Yuan, Xueliang & Liu, Xin & Zuo, Jian, 2015. "The development of new energy vehicles for a sustainable future: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 298-305.
    7. Granstrand, Ove & Holgersson, Marcus, 2020. "Innovation ecosystems: A conceptual review and a new definition," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 90.
    8. Phillip K. Agbesi & Rico Ruffino & Marko Hakovirta, 2023. "The development of sustainable electric vehicle business ecosystems," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(8), pages 1-59, August.
    9. Fuad Un-Noor & Sanjeevikumar Padmanaban & Lucian Mihet-Popa & Mohammad Nurunnabi Mollah & Eklas Hossain, 2017. "A Comprehensive Study of Key Electric Vehicle (EV) Components, Technologies, Challenges, Impacts, and Future Direction of Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-84, August.
    10. Chloe Brown & Doreen S. Boyd & Siddharth Kara, 2022. "Landscape Analysis of Cobalt Mining Activities from 2009 to 2021 Using Very High Resolution Satellite Data (Democratic Republic of the Congo)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-20, August.
    11. Kai Song & Yu Lan & Xian Zhang & Jinhai Jiang & Chuanyu Sun & Guang Yang & Fengshuo Yang & Hao Lan, 2023. "A Review on Interoperability of Wireless Charging Systems for Electric Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-22, February.
    12. Makena Coffman & Paul Bernstein & Sherilyn Wee, 2017. "Electric vehicles revisited: a review of factors that affect adoption," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 79-93, January.
    13. Andreia Martinho & Nils Herber & Maarten Kroesen & Caspar Chorus, 2021. "Ethical issues in focus by the autonomous vehicles industry," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(5), pages 556-577, September.
    14. Pettigrew, Simone & Cronin, Sophie L., 2019. "Stakeholder views on the social issues relating to the introduction of autonomous vehicles," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 64-67.
    15. Forrest, Kate & Mac Kinnon, Michael & Tarroja, Brian & Samuelsen, Scott, 2020. "Estimating the technical feasibility of fuel cell and battery electric vehicles for the medium and heavy duty sectors in California," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    16. Das, H.S. & Rahman, M.M. & Li, S. & Tan, C.W., 2020. "Electric vehicles standards, charging infrastructure, and impact on grid integration: A technological review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    17. Cao, Jidi & Chen, Xin & Qiu, Rui & Hou, Shuhua, 2021. "Electric vehicle industry sustainable development with a stakeholder engagement system," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Phillip K. Agbesi & Rico Ruffino & Marko Hakovirta, 2023. "The development of sustainable electric vehicle business ecosystems," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(8), pages 1-59, August.
    2. Baldwin, Carliss Y. & Bogers, Marcel L.A.M. & Kapoor, Rahul & West, Joel, 2024. "Focusing the ecosystem lens on innovation studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(3).
    3. Gomes, Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos & Flechas, Ximena Alejandra & Facin, Ana Lucia Figueiredo & Borini, Felipe Mendes, 2021. "Ecosystem management: Past achievements and future promises," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    4. Jeandri Robertson, 2020. "Competition in Knowledge Ecosystems: A Theory Elaboration Approach Using a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-19, September.
    5. Gomes, Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos & Fleury, André Leme & Oliveira, Maicon Gouvêa de & Facin, Ana Lucia Figueiredo, 2021. "Ecosystem policy roadmapping," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    6. Reiter, Andreas & Stonig, Joachim & Frankenberger, Karolin, 2024. "Managing multi-tiered innovation ecosystems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(1).
    7. Peñafiel-Mera, Allan & Santos, Georgina, 2024. "Differences in perceptions of fuel duties and emissions trading in road transport," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 24-38.
    8. Kamilla Kohn Rådberg & Hans Löfsten, 2023. "Developing a knowledge ecosystem for large-scale research infrastructure," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 441-467, February.
    9. Mandys, F., 2021. "Electric vehicles and consumer choices," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    10. Antonia Golab & Sebastian Zwickl-Bernhard & Hans Auer, 2022. "Minimum-Cost Fast-Charging Infrastructure Planning for Electric Vehicles along the Austrian High-Level Road Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-26, March.
    11. Mahinda Vilathgamuwa & Yateendra Mishra & Tan Yigitcanlar & Ashish Bhaskar & Clevo Wilson, 2022. "Mobile-Energy-as-a-Service (MEaaS): Sustainable Electromobility via Integrated Energy–Transport–Urban Infrastructure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, February.
    12. Ruoso, Ana Cristina & Ribeiro, José Luis Duarte, 2022. "An assessment of barriers and solutions for the deployment of electric vehicles in the Brazilian market," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 218-229.
    13. Khurana, Indu & Dutta, Dev K, 2021. "From latent to emergent entrepreneurship in innovation ecosystems: The role of entrepreneurial learning," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    14. Granstrand, Ove, 2024. "A cooperative game theory systems approach to the value analysis of (innovation) ecosystems," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    15. Miehé, Lucas & Palmié, Maximilian & Oghazi, Pejvak, 2023. "Connection successfully established: How complementors use connectivity technologies to join existing ecosystems – Four archetype strategies from the mobility sector," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    16. Sanchari Deb, 2021. "Machine Learning for Solving Charging Infrastructure Planning Problems: A Comprehensive Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, November.
    17. Liu, Lu & Zhou, Kaile, 2022. "Electric vehicle charging scheduling considering urgent demand under different charging modes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    18. Leyla Gamidullaeva & Tatyana Tolstykh & Andrey Bystrov & Alexey Radaykin & Nadezhda Shmeleva, 2021. "Cross-Sectoral Digital Platform as a Tool for Innovation Ecosystem Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-24, October.
    19. Md. Mosaraf Hossain Khan & Amran Hossain & Aasim Ullah & Molla Shahadat Hossain Lipu & S. M. Shahnewaz Siddiquee & M. Shafiul Alam & Taskin Jamal & Hafiz Ahmed, 2021. "Integration of Large-Scale Electric Vehicles into Utility Grid: An Efficient Approach for Impact Analysis and Power Quality Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, October.
    20. Hou, Hong & Shi, Yongjiang, 2021. "Ecosystem-as-structure and ecosystem-as-coevolution: A constructive examination," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Electric vehicles; Electromobility; Innovation ecosystem; Stakeholder; Survey;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M13 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - New Firms; Startups
    • O30 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - General
    • R40 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - General
    • Z10 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:snbeco:v:4:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s43546-024-00624-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.