IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/snbeco/v2y2022i9d10.1007_s43546-022-00299-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are livestock farmers in Kenya efficient? Evidence from a farm-level analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Manyeki John Kibara

    (University of Szeged)

  • Balázs Kotosz

    (IESEG School of Management)

Abstract

The Kenyan livestock sector has a high potential for economic development and poverty reduction amongst smallholder rural communities. The purpose of this paper is, therefore, the estimation of technical efficiency of the livestock farmers with respect to farms heterogeneity. In this way, the paper seeks to address the question of proper model specification of production frontier, distinguishing between inefficiency and farm heterogeneity and the associated influencing determinants. When technology heterogeneity is present in an industry, estimation of a single stochastic frontier will lead to misleading implication about inefficiency policy recommendations. Thus, this technical paper uses the most recent methodological approach (latent class stochastic frontier model) to distinguish different technologies for a representative farm-level sample of 1288 smallholder pastoral livestock households based on the class structure. Our analysis finds that technical efficiency levels rise as the number of classes increases, indicating that unless livestock farmers’ heterogeneity is adequately considered, estimated inefficiency is likely to be biased upward. The observed variation of efficiency score between classes suggests that potential gain can be achieved through indifferent improvement of the farms-specific factors namely the number of livestock production technology adopted, education level, access to markets, access to veterinary drugs and off-farm income. Technical efficiency being between 0.35 and 0.97 is heterogeneous; thereby, only a pro-pastoral policy option based on the identified class structures of the productive unit enables a more accurate and effectual measures to address efficiency challenges within the livestock industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Manyeki John Kibara & Balázs Kotosz, 2022. "Are livestock farmers in Kenya efficient? Evidence from a farm-level analysis," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(9), pages 1-30, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:snbeco:v:2:y:2022:i:9:d:10.1007_s43546-022-00299-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s43546-022-00299-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s43546-022-00299-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s43546-022-00299-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sebastian Gechert & Tomas Havranek & Zuzana Irsova & Dominika Kolcunova, 2022. "Measuring Capital-Labor Substitution: The Importance of Method Choices and Publication Bias," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 45, pages 55-82, July.
    2. John Kibara Manyeki & Balázs Kotosz, 2019. "Efficiency estimation and its role in policy recommendations: An application to the Kenyan livestock sector," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(2), pages 367-381, June.
    3. Jeremy T. Fox & Valérie Smeets, 2011. "Does Input Quality Drive Measured Differences In Firm Productivity?," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 52(4), pages 961-989, November.
    4. Stevenson, Rodney E., 1980. "Likelihood functions for generalized stochastic frontier estimation," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 57-66, May.
    5. Nobuhiko Fuwa & Christopher Edmonds & Pabitra Banik, 2007. "Are small‐scale rice farmers in eastern India really inefficient? Examining the effects of microtopography on technical efficiency estimates," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 36(3), pages 335-346, May.
    6. Johannes Sauer & Catherine J. Morrison Paul, 2013. "The empirical identification of heterogeneous technologies and technical change," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(11), pages 1461-1479, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Manyeki John Kibara & Kuria Simon & Rono Julius & Mulei Benson, 2024. "The Levels and Determinants of Profit Efficiency in Fodder Production: A Case of Southern Rangelands of Kenya," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(3), pages 2405-2414, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alvarez, Antonio & del Corral, Julio & Tauer, Loren W., 2012. "Modeling Unobserved Heterogeneity in New York Dairy Farms: One-Stage versus Two-Stage Models," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 41(3), pages 275-285, December.
    2. Hasan, Iftekhar & Lozano-Vivas, Ana, 2002. "Organizational Form and Expense Preference: Spanish Experience," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 135-150, April.
    3. Rossi, Martín, 2000. "Análisis de eficiencia aplicado a la regulación ¿Es importante la Distribución Elegida para el Término de Ineficiencia?," UADE Textos de Discusión 22_2000, Instituto de Economía, Universidad Argentina de la Empresa.
    4. Chen, Yi-Yi & Schmidt, Peter & Wang, Hung-Jen, 2014. "Consistent estimation of the fixed effects stochastic frontier model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 181(2), pages 65-76.
    5. repec:swn:wpaper:2023-02 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. V. Vandenberghe, 2018. "The Contribution of Educated Workers to Firms’ Efficiency Gains: The Key Role of Proximity to the ‘Local’ Frontier," De Economist, Springer, vol. 166(3), pages 259-283, September.
    7. Amit Gandhi & Salvador Navarro & David Rivers, 2011. "On the Identification of Production Functions: How Heterogeneous is Productivity?," University of Western Ontario, Centre for Human Capital and Productivity (CHCP) Working Papers 20119, University of Western Ontario, Centre for Human Capital and Productivity (CHCP).
    8. Michael E. Waugh, 2017. "Firm Dynamics and Immigration: The Case of High-Skilled Immigration," NBER Chapters, in: High-Skilled Migration to the United States and Its Economic Consequences, pages 205-238, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Takuma Kunieda & Akihisa Shibata, 2024. "Insurance against Aggregate Shocks," ISER Discussion Paper 1239, Institute of Social and Economic Research, The University of Osaka.
    10. Amaresh K Tiwari, 2023. "Automation In An Open, Catching-Up Economy: Aggregate And Microeconometric Evidence," University of Tartu - Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Working Paper Series 144, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Tartu (Estonia).
    11. Schuster, Florian & Krahé, Max & Sigl-Glöckner, Philippa & Leusder, Dominik, 2021. "The cyclical component of the debt brake: Analysis and a reform proposal," Papers 277890, Dezernat Zukunft - Institute for Macrofinance, Berlin.
    12. Schuster, Florian & Krahé, Max & Sigl-Glöckner, Philippa, 2021. "Wird die Konjunkturkomponente der Schuldenbremse in ihrer heutigen Ausgestaltung ihrer Aufgabe noch gerecht? Analyse und ein Reformvorschlag," Papers 277885, Dezernat Zukunft - Institute for Macrofinance, Berlin.
    13. Cuéllar Martín, Jaime & Martín-Román, Ángel L. & Moral, Alfonso, 2017. "A composed error model decomposition and spatial analysis of local unemployment," MPRA Paper 79783, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Ken-ichi Hashimoto & Ryonghun Im & Takuma Kunieda & Akihisa Shibata, 2025. "Relative Risk Aversion and Business Fluctuations," ISER Discussion Paper 1272, Institute of Social and Economic Research, The University of Osaka.
    15. Feng, Wei & Sun, Shujun & Yuan, Hang, 2023. "Research on the efficiency of factor allocation in the pilot free trade zones," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 727-745.
    16. Max Krahé & Florian Schuster & Philippa Sigl-Glöckner, 2021. "Wird die Konjunkturkomponente der Schuldenbremse ihrer Aufgabe noch gerecht? [Is the Cyclical Component of the Debt Brake Still Up to Its Task?]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 101(8), pages 621-628, August.
    17. Gechert, Sebastian & Heimberger, Philipp, 2022. "Do corporate tax cuts boost economic growth?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    18. Suqin Ge & João Macieira, 2024. "Unobserved Worker Quality and Inter‐Industry Wage Differentials," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(1), pages 459-515, March.
    19. Léopold Simar & Valentin Zelenyuk, 2011. "Stochastic FDH/DEA estimators for frontier analysis," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 1-20, August.
    20. Billé, AG & Salvioni, C. & Benedetti, R., 2015. "Spatial Heterogeneity In Production Functions Models," 150th Seminar, October 22-23, 2015, Edinburgh, Scotland 212662, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    21. Mathilde Esposito, 2024. "Workforce Aging and Potential Output Growth," AMSE Working Papers 2425, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, France.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Latent class model; Technical efficiency; Stochastic frontier; Heterogeneous; Livestock production; Kenya;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q12 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy
    • D24 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Production; Cost; Capital; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity; Capacity

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:snbeco:v:2:y:2022:i:9:d:10.1007_s43546-022-00299-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.