IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/sjobre/v67y2015i69d10.1007_bf03372932.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategische Führung in Industrial Service Networks: Leitgedanken zu Chancen und Grenzen aus Sicht von KMU

Author

Listed:
  • Gordon Müller-Seitz

    (Technische Universität Kaiserslautern)

Abstract

Zusammenfassung Kleine und mittlere Unternehmen (KMU) bieten aufgrund global vernetzter Wertschöpfungsketten immer häufiger nebst industriellen Produkten auch komplementäre Dienstleistungen an. In der Regel können die KMU diese Dienstleistungen nicht alle selbst anbieten, sondern sind dafür auf die Kooperation mit (internationalen) Partnern angewiesen. Daher sind sie zunehmend gezwungen, sich ausgehend von ihrer produktbezogenen Kernkompetenz als Netzwerkführer zu etablieren oder sich gegenüber dominanteren, für sie Dienstleistungen erbringenden Kooperationspartnern durchzusetzen. Dieser konzeptionelle Beitrag zeigt auf, welche strategischen Handlungsoptionen der Netzwerksteuerung existieren und legt zugleich Risiken durch die Beteiligung an solchen Industrial Service Networks aus Sicht von KMU dar.

Suggested Citation

  • Gordon Müller-Seitz, 2015. "Strategische Führung in Industrial Service Networks: Leitgedanken zu Chancen und Grenzen aus Sicht von KMU," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 67(69), pages 17-34, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:67:y:2015:i:69:d:10.1007_bf03372932
    DOI: 10.1007/BF03372932
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF03372932
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF03372932?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Carlos Jarillo, 1988. "On strategic networks," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(1), pages 31-41, January.
    2. Gilsing, Victor & Nooteboom, Bart & Vanhaverbeke, Wim & Duysters, Geert & van den Oord, Ad, 2008. "Network embeddedness and the exploration of novel technologies: Technological distance, betweenness centrality and density," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 1717-1731, December.
    3. Gordon Walker & Bruce Kogut & Weijian Shan, 1997. "Social Capital, Structural Holes and the Formation of an Industry Network," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(2), pages 109-125, April.
    4. Thilo C. Beck, 2012. "Organisatorische Umsetzung von Lösungsanbieterschaft bei Siemens Healthcare," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 64(65), pages 199-216, January.
    5. Anthony Goerzen, 2007. "Alliance networks and firm performance: The impact of repeated partnerships," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 487-509, May.
    6. Cristina Boari & Andrea Lipparini, 1999. "Networks within Industrial Districts: Organising Knowledge Creation and Transfer by Means of Moderate Hierarchies," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 3(4), pages 339-360, December.
    7. Mark Lazerson & Gianni Lorenzoni, 1999. "Resisting Organizational Inertia: The Evolution of Industrial Districts," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 3(4), pages 361-377, December.
    8. Dahlander, Linus & Gann, David M., 2010. "How open is innovation?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 699-709, July.
    9. Reinhold Groß & Karsten Tonn, 2012. "Erfahrungen auf dem Weg zum Lösungsanbieter bei der Firma TRUMPF Werkzeugmaschinen," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 64(65), pages 173-185, January.
    10. Henry Mintzberg & James A. Waters, 1985. "Of strategies, deliberate and emergent," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(3), pages 257-272, July.
    11. Jörg Sydow & Arnold Windeler, 1998. "Organizing and Evaluating Interfirm Networks: A Structurationist Perspective on Network Processes and Effectiveness," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 265-284, June.
    12. Wilma W. Suen, 2005. "Non-Cooperation — The Dark Side of Strategic Alliances," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-230-59657-3, September.
    13. Dittrich, Koen & Duysters, Geert & de Man, Ard-Pieter, 2007. "Strategic repositioning by means of alliance networks: The case of IBM," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 1496-1511, December.
    14. Georg Schreyögg & Jörg Sydow, 2010. "CROSSROADS---Organizing for Fluidity? Dilemmas of New Organizational Forms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(6), pages 1251-1262, December.
    15. Jörg Sydow & Arnold Windeler & Jörg Sydow & Arnold Windeler, 2003. "Knowledge, Trust, and Control: Managing Tensions and Contradictions in a Regional Network of Service Firms," International Studies of Management & Organization, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(2), pages 69-100, January.
    16. DeBresson, Chris & Amesse, Fernand, 1991. "Networks of innovators :A review and introduction to the issue," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(5), pages 363-379, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hans Berends & Elco van Burg & Erik M. van Raaij, 2011. "Contacts and Contracts: Cross-Level Network Dynamics in the Development of an Aircraft Material," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 940-960, August.
    2. Golonka, Monika, 2015. "Proactive cooperation with strangers: Enhancing complexity of the ICT firms' alliance portfolio and their innovativeness," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 168-178.
    3. Theresia Gunawan & Jojo Jacob & Geert Duysters, 2016. "Network ties and entrepreneurial orientation: Innovative performance of SMEs in a developing country," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 575-599, June.
    4. Duysters, Geert & Lemmens, Charmianne & Letterie, Wilko & Vanhaverbeke, Wim, 2008. "The Innovative Performance of Alliance Block Members: Evidence from the Microelectronics Industry," MERIT Working Papers 2008-064, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    5. Mazzola, Erica & Perrone, Giovanni & Kamuriwo, Dzidziso Samuel, 2015. "Network embeddedness and new product development in the biopharmaceutical industry: The moderating role of open innovation flow," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 106-119.
    6. Nooteboom, B., 2006. "Learning and Innovation in Inter-Organizational Relationships and Networks," Other publications TiSEM 8d768d99-325c-4313-a9fa-6, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    7. Kudic, Muhamed & Guhr, Katja, 2013. "Cooperation Events, Ego-Network Characteristics and Firm Innovativeness – Empirical Evidence from the German Laser Industry," IWH Discussion Papers 6/2013, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    8. Gagalyuk, Taras, 2012. "Goal achievement in supply chain networks: A study of the Ukrainian agri-food business," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), volume 64, number 64.
    9. Rangga Almahendra, 2023. "Disentangling Learning Network Dilemma: A Small-World Effect in a Globalized World," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-15, January.
    10. Zhiang (John) Lin & James A. Kitts & Haibin Yang & J. Richard Harrison, 2008. "Elucidating strategic network dynamics through computational modeling," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 175-208, September.
    11. Benoît Desmarchelier & Faridah Djellal & Faïz Gallouj, 2018. "Public Service Innovation Networks (PSINs): Collaborating for Innovation and Value Creation," Working Papers halshs-01934275, HAL.
    12. van Criekingen, Kristof & Freel, Mark & Czarnitzki, Dirk, 2021. "Open innovation deficiency: Evidence on project abandonment and delay," ZEW Discussion Papers 21-006, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    13. Bjorn Remneland Wikhamn & Alexander Styhre, 2019. "Open Innovation Groundwork," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(02), pages 1-29, January.
    14. Bryan T. Stinchfield & Reed E. Nelson & Matthew S. Wood, 2013. "Learning from Levi–Strauss’ Legacy: Art, Craft, Engineering, Bricolage, and Brokerage in Entrepreneurship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 37(4), pages 889-921, July.
    15. Bamiatzi, Vassiliki & Cavusgil, Salih Tamer & Jabbour, Liza & Sinkovics, Rudolf R., 2014. "Does business group affiliation help firms achieve superior performance during industrial downturns? An empirical examination," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 195-211.
    16. Baum, Joel A.C. & Cowan, Robin & Jonard, Nicolas, 2012. "Prescriptions for network strategy: Does evidence of network effects in cross-section support them?," MERIT Working Papers 2012-044, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    17. Santoro, Gabriele & Bresciani, Stefano & Papa, Armando, 2020. "Collaborative modes with Cultural and Creative Industries and innovation performance: The moderating role of heterogeneous sources of knowledge and absorptive capacity," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 92.
    18. Sroka Włodzimierz, 2011. "Problem of Trust in Alliance Networks," Organizacija, Sciendo, vol. 44(4), pages 101-108, July.
    19. Shuping Li & Sai Yayavaram, 2021. "Attenuating the negative effects of network change on innovation: A whole network level analysis of Taiwanese business groups," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 151-177, March.
    20. Järvi, Kati & Almpanopoulou, Argyro & Ritala, Paavo, 2018. "Organization of knowledge ecosystems: Prefigurative and partial forms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(8), pages 1523-1537.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    L20; M16;

    JEL classification:

    • L20 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - General
    • M16 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - International Business Administration

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:67:y:2015:i:69:d:10.1007_bf03372932. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.