IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v115y2018i1d10.1007_s11192-017-2586-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting the research output/growth of selected countries: application of Even GM (1, 1) and NDGM models

Author

Listed:
  • Saad Ahmed Javed

    () (Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics)

  • Sifeng Liu

    () (Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics)

Abstract

The study aims to forecast the research output of four selected countries (USA, China, India and Pakistan) using two models of Grey System Theory—Even Model GM (1, 1) and Nonhomogeneous Discrete Grey Model (NDGM). The study also conducts publication growth analysis using relative growth rate (RGR) and the doubling time (D t). The linear and exponential regression analyses were also performed for comparison. The study also proposes and successfully tests two novel synthetic models for RGR and D t that facilities the comparison of the countries’ performance when actual data and forecasted data produce different sequences of performance in the given period of time. The data of documents published by the four countries from 2005 to 2016 was collected from SJR/Scopus website. Performance criterion was Mean Absolute Percentage Error. The study confirms that NDGM is a better model for forecasting research output as its accuracy level is higher than that of the Even Model GM (1, 1) and statistical regression models. The results revealed that USA is likely to continue leading in research output at least till 2025 however the research output difference between USA and China is likely to reduce. The study reveals that the less developed countries tend to possess higher relative growth rate in publications whereas the more developed countries tend to possess lower relative growth rate. Further, the more developed countries need more time for publications to double in numbers for a given relative growth rate and less developed countries need less time to do so. The study is original in term of its analysis of the problem using the models involved in the study. The study suggests that the strategies of USA and China to enhance the research output of their respective countries seem productive for the time being however in long run less developed countries have greater competitive advantage over the more developed countries because of their publication growth rate and time required to double the number of publications. The study reported nearly linear trend of growth in research output among the countries. The study is primarily important for the academic policy makers and encourages them to take corrective measures if the growth rate of their academic/publishing sector is not reasonable.

Suggested Citation

  • Saad Ahmed Javed & Sifeng Liu, 2018. "Predicting the research output/growth of selected countries: application of Even GM (1, 1) and NDGM models," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 115(1), pages 395-413, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:115:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-017-2586-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-017-2586-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-017-2586-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marco Pautasso, 2012. "Publication Growth in Biological Sub-Fields: Patterns, Predictability and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 4(12), pages 1-14, November.
    2. Kostoff, Ronald N., 2012. "China/USA nanotechnology research output comparison—2011 update," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 79(5), pages 986-990.
    3. Abdulnasser Hatemi-J & Ahdi N. Ajmi & Ghassen El Montasser & Roula Inglesi-Lotz & Rangan Gupta, 2016. "Research output and economic growth in G7 countries: new evidence from asymmetric panel causality testing," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(24), pages 2301-2308, May.
    4. Har Kaur & B. M. Gupta, 2010. "Mapping of dental science research in India: a scientometric analysis of India’s research output, 1999–2008," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 85(1), pages 361-376, October.
    5. R. S. Bajwa & K. Yaldram & S. Rafique, 2013. "A scientometric assessment of research output in nanoscience and nanotechnology: Pakistan perspective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 94(1), pages 333-342, January.
    6. Roula Inglesi-Lotz & Tsangyao Chang & Rangan Gupta, 2015. "Causality between research output and economic growth in BRICS," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 167-176, January.
    7. B. M. Gupta & S. M. Dhawan, 2009. "Status of India in science and technology as reflected in its publication output in the Scopus international database, 1996–2006," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 80(2), pages 473-490, August.
    8. Hamilton Ntuli & Roula Inglesi-Lotz & Tsangyao Chang & Anastassios Pouris, 2015. "Does research output cause economic growth or vice versa? Evidence from 34 OECD countries," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 66(8), pages 1709-1716, August.
    9. Lorenzo Ductor & Marcel Fafchamps & Sanjeev Goyal & Marco J. van der Leij, 2014. "Social Networks and Research Output," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 96(5), pages 936-948, December.
    10. Shaodong Xie & Jing Zhang & Yuh-Shan Ho, 2008. "Assessment of world aerosol research trends by bibliometric analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 77(1), pages 113-130, October.
    11. Lutz Bornmann & Rüdiger Mutz, 2015. "Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 66(11), pages 2215-2222, November.
    12. Xianwen Wang & Di Liu & Kun Ding & Xinran Wang, 2012. "Science funding and research output: a study on 10 countries," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 91(2), pages 591-599, May.
    13. R. Inglesi-Lotz & A. Pouris, 2013. "The influence of scientific research output of academics on economic growth in South Africa: an autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) application," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 95(1), pages 129-139, April.
    14. Peder Olesen Larsen & Markus Ins, 2010. "The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 84(3), pages 575-603, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ikram, M. & Sroufe, Robert & Rehman, E. & Shah, S.Z.A. & Mahmoudi, A., 2020. "Do Quality, Environmental, and Social (QES) Certifications Improve International Trade? A Comparative Grey Relation Analysis of Developing vs. Developed Countries," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 545(C).
    2. Wu, Wenqing & Ma, Xin & Zeng, Bo & Wang, Yong & Cai, Wei, 2019. "Forecasting short-term renewable energy consumption of China using a novel fractional nonlinear grey Bernoulli model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 70-87.
    3. Henry Laverde-Rojas & Juan C. Correa, 2019. "Can scientific productivity impact the economic complexity of countries?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 120(1), pages 267-282, July.
    4. Ofosu-Adarkwa, Jeffrey & Xie, Naiming & Javed, Saad Ahmed, 2020. "Forecasting CO2 emissions of China's cement industry using a hybrid Verhulst-GM(1,N) model and emissions' technical conversion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:115:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-017-2586-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla) or (Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.