IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v130y2025i3d10.1007_s11192-025-05271-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are there too many papers by the same authors within the same conference proceedings? Norms and extremities within the field of human–computer interaction

Author

Listed:
  • Frode Eika Sandnes

    (Oslo Metropolitan University)

Abstract

A substantial portion of computer science research is published in conference proceedings. An academic conference allows researchers to meet, network, learn, exchange ideas, seek inspiration and share their experiences and findings. This study was triggered by an impression that some authors publish several papers within the same conference, sometimes filling an entire session. Such back-to-back presentations by the same author can be monotonous to witness. This study therefore set out to assess if this repeat author impression is supported by empirical evidence. An analysis was performed based on Scopus data for 31 key conferences within human–computer interaction. The results indeed confirm the phenomenon of repeat authors within conference proceedings. The maximum number of papers with the same author was six contributions based on the conference median, that is, in 16 of the 31 conferences at least one author was listed as co-author on at least six contributions. In the most extreme instance one author was listed on 32 contributions within the same conference. Papers by repeat authors often shared similar contents. The multiple co-author phenomenon was prominent in both highly ranked conferences as well conferences with a lower rank. Conference chairs (gatekeepers) were overrepresented among authors with multiple papers as more than 50% of gatekeepers across 23 of 31 conferences had more than one contribution within the conference they organised. An analysis of a large multi-conference showed that publishing across different proceedings volumes under the same conference umbrella is common and that such multi-authorships are obfuscated from the statistics if considering each volume in isolation. Implications of this study is that conference organisers should draw attention towards the overall author profile and consider ceilings on the number of papers permissible for each author. Moreover, organizers should reflect over the appropriateness of themselves publishing (many) papers within their own conferences.

Suggested Citation

  • Frode Eika Sandnes, 2025. "Are there too many papers by the same authors within the same conference proceedings? Norms and extremities within the field of human–computer interaction," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(3), pages 1659-1699, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:130:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-025-05271-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-025-05271-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-025-05271-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-025-05271-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John P. A. Ioannidis & Richard Klavans & Kevin W. Boyack, 2018. "Thousands of scientists publish a paper every five days," Nature, Nature, vol. 561(7722), pages 167-169, September.
    2. Frode Eika Sandnes, 2018. "Do Norwegian academics who publish more earn higher salaries?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 115(1), pages 263-281, April.
    3. Frode Eika Sandnes, 2024. "Can we identify prominent scholars using ChatGPT?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(1), pages 713-718, January.
    4. Lutz Bornmann, 2024. "Skewed distributions of scientists’ productivity: a research program for the empirical analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(4), pages 2455-2468, April.
    5. Lokman I. Meho & Yvonne Rogers, 2008. "Citation counting, citation ranking, and h‐index of human‐computer interaction researchers: A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 59(11), pages 1711-1726, September.
    6. Sugimoto, Cassidy R. & Larivière, Vincent & Ni, Chaoqun & Cronin, Blaise, 2013. "Journal acceptance rates: A cross-disciplinary analysis of variability and relationships with journal measures," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 7(4), pages 897-906.
    7. Omar Mubin & Mudassar Arsalan & Abdullah Al Mahmud, 2018. "Tracking the follow-up of work in progress papers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(3), pages 1159-1174, March.
    8. Jinseok Kim, 2019. "Author‐based analysis of conference versus journal publication in computer science," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 70(1), pages 71-82, January.
    9. Danielle H. Lee, 2019. "Predictive power of conference-related factors on citation rates of conference papers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(1), pages 281-304, January.
    10. Frode Eika Sandnes, 2020. "A simple back-of-the-envelope test for self-citations using Google Scholar author profiles," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(2), pages 1685-1689, August.
    11. John P. A. Ioannidis & Thomas A. Collins & Jeroen Baas, 2024. "Evolving patterns of extreme publishing behavior across science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(9), pages 5783-5796, September.
    12. Kyle Siler & Philippe Vincent-Lamarre & Cassidy R Sugimoto & Vincent Larivière, 2022. "Cumulative advantage and citation performance of repeat authors in scholarly journals," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(4), pages 1-17, April.
    13. Teddy Lazebnik & Stephan Beck & Labib Shami, 2023. "Academic co-authorship is a risky game," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(12), pages 6495-6507, December.
    14. Simone Diniz Junqueira Barbosa & Milene Selbach Silveira & Isabela Gasparini, 2017. "What publications metadata tell us about the evolution of a scientific community: the case of the Brazilian human–computer interaction conference series," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 110(1), pages 275-300, January.
    15. António Correia & Hugo Paredes & Benjamim Fonseca, 2018. "Scientometric analysis of scientific publications in CSCW," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(1), pages 31-89, January.
    16. Lutz Bornmann & Rüdiger Mutz, 2015. "Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 66(11), pages 2215-2222, November.
    17. Christoph Bartneck, 2011. "The end of the beginning: a reflection on the first five years of the HRI conference," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 86(2), pages 487-504, February.
    18. Christoph Bartneck & Jun Hu, 2010. "The fruits of collaboration in a multidisciplinary field," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 85(1), pages 41-52, October.
    19. Pengfei Jia & Weixi Xie & Guangyao Zhang & Xianwen Wang, 2023. "Do reviewers get their deserved acknowledgments from the authors of manuscripts?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(10), pages 5687-5703, October.
    20. Leo Egghe & Ronald Rousseau, 2012. "Theory and practice of the shifted Lotka function," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 91(1), pages 295-301, April.
    21. Yi Bu & Ying Ding & Jian Xu & Xingkun Liang & Gege Gao & Yiming Zhao, 2018. "Understanding success through the diversity of collaborators and the milestone of career," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 69(1), pages 87-97, January.
    22. Vadim Y. Kuperman & Gerald H. Sokol, 2024. "On the causes and ramifications of multi-authorship in science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(4), pages 2205-2225, April.
    23. Jian Xu & Ying Ding & Vincent Malic, 2015. "Author Credit for Transdisciplinary Collaboration," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-19, September.
    24. Kyriakos Drivas, 2024. "The evolution of order of authorship based on researchers’ age," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(9), pages 5615-5633, September.
    25. Santiago Salinas & Stephan B Munch, 2015. "Where Should I Send It? Optimizing the Submission Decision Process," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, January.
    26. Steven A. Morris & Michel L. Goldstein, 2007. "Manifestation of research teams in journal literature: A growth model of papers, authors, collaboration, coauthorship, weak ties, and Lotka's law," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 58(12), pages 1764-1782, October.
    27. Yan-Hong Yang & Ying-Hui Shao, 2024. "Education journal rankings: a diversity-based Author Affiliation Index assessment methodology," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(5), pages 2677-2700, May.
    28. Shiji Chen & Yanan Guo & Alvin Shijie Ding & Yanhui Song, 2024. "Is interdisciplinarity more likely to produce novel or disruptive research?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(5), pages 2615-2632, May.
    29. Yan Jiang & Robert Lerrigo & Anika Ullah & Muthu Alagappan & Steven M Asch & Steven N Goodman & Sidhartha R Sinha, 2019. "The high resource impact of reformatting requirements for scientific papers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-13, October.
    30. Yi Bu & Dakota S. Murray & Ying Ding & Yong Huang & Yiming Zhao, 2018. "Measuring the stability of scientific collaboration," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(2), pages 463-479, February.
    31. Elizaveta Savchenko & Ariel Rosenfeld, 2024. "Authorship conflicts in academia: an international cross-discipline survey," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(4), pages 2101-2121, April.
    32. Katchanov, Yurij L. & Markova, Yulia V. & Shmatko, Natalia A., 2023. "Empirical demonstration of the Matthew effect in scientific research careers," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 17(4).
    33. Frode Eika Sandnes, 2021. "Everyone onboard? Participation ratios as a metric for research activity assessments within young universities," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(7), pages 6105-6113, July.
    34. Evelyn Eika & Frode Eika Sandnes, 2022. "Starstruck by journal prestige and citation counts? On students’ bias and perceptions of trustworthiness according to clues in publication references," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(11), pages 6363-6390, November.
    35. Kjetil K. Haugen & Frode E. Sandnes, 2016. "The new Norwegian incentive system for publication: from bad to worse," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(2), pages 1299-1306, November.
    36. Vinícius da F. Vieira & Carlos H. G. Ferreira & Jussara M. Almeida & Edré Moreira & Alberto H. F. Laender & Wagner Meira & Marcos André Gonçalves, 2024. "A network-driven study of hyperprolific authors in computer science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(4), pages 2255-2283, April.
    37. Peder Olesen Larsen & Markus Ins, 2010. "The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 84(3), pages 575-603, September.
    38. Omar Mubin & Dhaval Tejlavwala & Mudassar Arsalan & Muneeb Ahmad & Simeon Simoff, 2018. "An assessment into the characteristics of award winning papers at CHI," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(2), pages 1181-1201, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frode Eika Sandnes, 2021. "A bibliometric study of human–computer interaction research activity in the Nordic-Baltic Eight countries," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(6), pages 4733-4767, June.
    2. Evelyn Eika & Frode Eika Sandnes, 2022. "Starstruck by journal prestige and citation counts? On students’ bias and perceptions of trustworthiness according to clues in publication references," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(11), pages 6363-6390, November.
    3. Frode Eika Sandnes, 2024. "Can we identify prominent scholars using ChatGPT?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(1), pages 713-718, January.
    4. Frode Eika Sandnes, 2021. "Everyone onboard? Participation ratios as a metric for research activity assessments within young universities," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(7), pages 6105-6113, July.
    5. Debarshi Kumar Sanyal & Plaban Kumar Bhowmick & Partha Pratim Das & Samiran Chattopadhyay & T. Y. S. S. Santosh, 2019. "Enhancing access to scholarly publications with surrogate resources," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 121(2), pages 1129-1164, November.
    6. António Correia & Hugo Paredes & Benjamim Fonseca, 2018. "Scientometric analysis of scientific publications in CSCW," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(1), pages 31-89, January.
    7. Li, Xin & Tang, Xuli, 2021. "Characterizing interdisciplinarity in drug research: A translational science perspective," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(4).
    8. Kurubaran Ganasegeran & Chee Peng Hor & Mohd Fadzly Amar Jamil & Purnima Devi Suppiah & Juliana Mohd Noor & Norshahida Abdul Hamid & Deik Roy Chuan & Mohd Rizal Abdul Manaf & Alan Swee Hock Ch’ng & Ir, 2021. "Mapping the Scientific Landscape of Diabetes Research in Malaysia (2000–2018): A Systematic Scientometrics Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-20, January.
    9. Ju Wen & Lei Lei, 2022. "Adjectives and adverbs in life sciences across 50 years: implications for emotions and readability in academic texts," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(8), pages 4731-4749, August.
    10. Ana Teresa Santos & Sandro Mendonça, 2022. "Do papers (really) match journals’ “aims and scope”? A computational assessment of innovation studies," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(12), pages 7449-7470, December.
    11. Anna Tietze & Philip Hofmann, 2019. "The h-index and multi-author hm-index for individual researchers in condensed matter physics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(1), pages 171-185, April.
    12. Andreas Rehs, 2020. "A structural topic model approach to scientific reorientation of economics and chemistry after German reunification," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(2), pages 1229-1251, November.
    13. Saad Ahmed Javed & Sifeng Liu, 2018. "Predicting the research output/growth of selected countries: application of Even GM (1, 1) and NDGM models," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 115(1), pages 395-413, April.
    14. Jianchoun Dou, 2021. "Variety, Fertility, and Long-term Economic Growth," LIDAM Discussion Papers IRES 2021020, Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES).
    15. Ksenia Silchenko, 2018. "The other "meta" of meta-analysis: Qualitative and text-based approaches to "analysis of analyses" in marketing," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(4), pages 27-45.
    16. Lutz Bornmann, 2024. "Skewed distributions of scientists’ productivity: a research program for the empirical analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(4), pages 2455-2468, April.
    17. Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva & Aceil Al-Khatib & Panagiotis Tsigaris, 2020. "Spam emails in academia: issues and costs," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(2), pages 1171-1188, February.
    18. Waltman, Ludo, 2016. "A review of the literature on citation impact indicators," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 365-391.
    19. Marian R. Chertow & Koichi S. Kanaoka & Jooyoung Park, 2021. "Tracking the diffusion of industrial symbiosis scholarship using bibliometrics: Comparing across Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(4), pages 913-931, August.
    20. Amador Durán-Sánchez & María de la Cruz del Río-Rama & José à lvarez-García & Cristiana Oliveira, 2022. "Analysis of Worldwide Research on Craft Beer," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Research productivity; Academic reputation; Conference experience; Conference quality; Paper quality; Peer-review quality; Multi-conference; Hyperprolific authors; Gatekeepers;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education
    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions
    • I28 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:130:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-025-05271-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.