IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v129y2024i4d10.1007_s11192-024-04972-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Authorship conflicts in academia: an international cross-discipline survey

Author

Listed:
  • Elizaveta Savchenko

    (Ariel University)

  • Ariel Rosenfeld

    (Bar-Ilan University)

Abstract

Collaboration among scholars has emerged as a significant characteristic of contemporary science. As a result, the number of authors listed in publications continues to rise steadily. Unfortunately, determining the authors to be included in the byline and their respective order entails multiple difficulties which often lead to conflicts. Despite the large volume of literature about conflicts in academia, it remains unclear how exactly these are distributed over the main socio-demographic properties, as well as the different types of interactions academics experience. To address this gap, we conducted an international and cross-disciplinary survey answered by 752 academics from 41 fields of research and 93 countries that statistically well-represent the overall academic workforce. Our findings are concerning and suggest that conflicts over authorship credit arise very early in one’s academic career, even at the level of Master and Ph.D., and become increasingly common over time.

Suggested Citation

  • Elizaveta Savchenko & Ariel Rosenfeld, 2024. "Authorship conflicts in academia: an international cross-discipline survey," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(4), pages 2101-2121, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:129:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s11192-024-04972-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-024-04972-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-024-04972-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-024-04972-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thais Gargantini & Michael Daly & Joseph Sherlock & Teddy Lazebnik, 2022. "Providing Safe Space for Honest Mistakes in the Public Sector Is the Most Important Predictor for Work Engagement after Strategic Clarity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-12, June.
    2. Sameer Kumar & Kuru Ratnavelu, 2016. "Perceptions of Scholars in the Field of Economics on Co-Authorship Associations: Evidence from an International Survey," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Md. Mizanur Rahman & Noor Azman Ali & Amer Hamzah Jantan & Zuraina Dato' Mansor & Md. Saidur Rahaman, 2020. "Work to family, family to work conflicts and work family balance as predictors of job satisfaction of Malaysian academic community," Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 14(4), pages 621-642, July.
    4. Karolina Urbanska & Sylvie Huet & Serge Guimond, 2019. "Does increased interdisciplinary contact among hard and social scientists help or hinder interdisciplinary research?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, September.
    5. Teddy Lazebnik & Dan Gorlitsky, 2023. "Can We Mathematically Spot the Possible Manipulation of Results in Research Manuscripts Using Benford’s Law?," Data, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-11, October.
    6. Gómez-Ferri, Javier & González-Alcaide, Gregorio & LLopis-Goig, Ramón, 2019. "Measuring dissatisfaction with coauthorship: An empirical approach based on the researchers’ perception," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 13(4).
    7. Mengjiao Qi & An Zeng & Menghui Li & Ying Fan & Zengru Di, 2017. "Standing on the shoulders of giants: the effect of outstanding scientists on young collaborators’ careers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(3), pages 1839-1850, June.
    8. Jonathan Adams, 2013. "The fourth age of research," Nature, Nature, vol. 497(7451), pages 557-560, May.
    9. Jean F. Liénard & Titipat Achakulvisut & Daniel E. Acuna & Stephen V. David, 2018. "Intellectual synthesis in mentorship determines success in academic careers," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, December.
    10. Anton Grafström & Lina Schelin, 2014. "How to Select Representative Samples," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 41(2), pages 277-290, June.
    11. Eric A Fong & Allen W Wilhite, 2017. "Authorship and citation manipulation in academic research," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-34, December.
    12. Mott Greene, 2007. "The demise of the lone author," Nature, Nature, vol. 450(7173), pages 1165-1165, December.
    13. Michael O’Fallon & Kenneth Butterfield, 2012. "The Influence of Unethical Peer Behavior on Observers’ Unethical Behavior: A Social Cognitive Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 109(2), pages 117-131, August.
    14. Mark Urassa & David W. Lawson & Joyce Wamoyi & Eshetu Gurmu & Mhairi A. Gibson & Purnima Madhivanan & Caitlyn Placek, 2021. "Cross-cultural research must prioritize equitable collaboration," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(6), pages 668-671, June.
    15. Felicitas Hesselmann & Cornelia Schendzielorz & Nikita Sorgatz, 2021. "Say my name, say my name: Academic authorship conventions between editorial policies and disciplinary practices [Rethinking Authorship in the Era of Collaborative Research]," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 30(3), pages 382-392.
    16. Bozeman, Barry & Corley, Elizabeth, 2004. "Scientists' collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 599-616, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lu, Wei & Ren, Yan & Huang, Yong & Bu, Yi & Zhang, Yuehan, 2021. "Scientific collaboration and career stages: An ego-centric perspective," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(4).
    2. Graf, Holger & Kalthaus, Martin, 2018. "International research networks: Determinants of country embeddedness," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(7), pages 1198-1214.
    3. Danielle Lee, 2024. "Exploring the determinants of research performance for early-career researchers: a literature review," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(1), pages 181-235, January.
    4. Weihua Li & Sam Zhang & Zhiming Zheng & Skyler J. Cranmer & Aaron Clauset, 2022. "Untangling the network effects of productivity and prominence among scientists," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Kjersten Bunker Whittington & Molly M. King & Isabella Cingolani, 2024. "Structure, status, and span: gender differences in co-authorship networks across 16 region-subject pairs (2009–2013)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(1), pages 147-179, January.
    6. Corsini, Alberto & Pezzoni, Michele & Visentin, Fabiana, 2022. "What makes a productive Ph.D. student?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(10).
    7. Elizabeth S. Vieira, 2023. "The influence of research collaboration on citation impact: the countries in the European Innovation Scoreboard," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(6), pages 3555-3579, June.
    8. Li Hou & Qiang Wu & Yundong Xie, 2022. "Does early publishing in top journals really predict long-term scientific success in the business field?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(11), pages 6083-6107, November.
    9. Bastian Rake & Pablo D’Este & Maureen McKelvey, 2021. "Exploring network dynamics in science: the formation of ties to knowledge translators in clinical research," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 31(5), pages 1433-1464, November.
    10. Batista-Jr, Antônio de Abreu & Gouveia, Fábio Castro & Mena-Chalco, Jesús P., 2021. "Predicting the Q of junior researchers using data from the first years of publication," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(2).
    11. Jane G. Payumo & Jamie Monson & Amy Jamison & Bradley W. Fenwick, 2019. "Metrics-based profiling of university research engagement with Africa: research management, gender, and internationalization perspective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 121(2), pages 675-698, November.
    12. Mike Thelwall & Kayvan Kousha & Mahshid Abdoli & Emma Stuart & Meiko Makita & Paul Wilson & Jonathan Levitt, 2024. "Which international co‐authorships produce higher quality journal articles?," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 75(7), pages 769-788, July.
    13. Kun Chen & Xia-xia Gao & Yi-di Huang & Wen-tao Xu & Guo-liang Yang, 2024. "The dual dimension of scientific research experience acquisition and its development: a 40-year analysis of Chinese Humanities and Social Sciences Journals," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(5), pages 2827-2853, May.
    14. Whittington, Kjersten Bunker, 2018. "“A tie is a tie? Gender and network positioning in life science inventor collaboration”," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 511-526.
    15. Candelaria Barrios & Esther Flores & M. Ángeles Martínez & Marta Ruiz-Martínez, 2019. "Is there convergence in international research collaboration? An exploration at the country level in the basic and applied science fields," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 120(2), pages 631-659, August.
    16. Jonathan Adams & Karen Gurney & Daniel Hook & Loet Leydesdorff, 2014. "International collaboration clusters in Africa," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(1), pages 547-556, January.
    17. Ebadi, Ashkan & Schiffauerova, Andrea, 2015. "How to become an important player in scientific collaboration networks?," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 809-825.
    18. Teddy Lazebnik & Stephan Beck & Labib Shami, 2023. "Academic co-authorship is a risky game," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(12), pages 6495-6507, December.
    19. Zhigang Hu & Wencan Tian & Jiacheng Guo & Xianwen Wang, 2020. "Mapping research collaborations in different countries and regions: 1980–2019," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(1), pages 729-745, July.
    20. Belén Álvarez-Bornstein & Adrián A. Díaz-Faes & María Bordons, 2019. "What characterises funded biomedical research? Evidence from a basic and a clinical domain," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(2), pages 805-825, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:129:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s11192-024-04972-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.