IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/rrorus/v11y2021i4d10.1134_s2079970521040043.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutional Policy and the Role of Foreign Direct Investment in the Far East of Russia

Author

Listed:
  • I. P. Glazyrina

    (Institute of Natural Resources, Ecology and Cryology, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
    Transbaikal State University)

  • L. M. Faleychik

    (Institute of Natural Resources, Ecology and Cryology, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences)

  • A. A. Faleychik

    (Transbaikal State University)

Abstract

— The article studies investment flows and their impact on the diversification of regional economies of eastern federal subjects in the context of new institutional incentives created by state policy in the Far East after 2013. The dynamics of foreign direct investment (FDI), including the main sectors, and its relationship with the rate of economic growth are considered. The study was based on official statistical information from the Federal State Statistics Service and the Bank of Russia using GIS technologies and comparative and correlation analysis. The distribution of FDI flows by type of economic activity uses the classification of the Bank of Russia, which corresponds to the methodology of the UN International Standard Industrial Classification (ISIC4) and its European equivalent (NACE2). Calculations have shown that while there is some regression between per capita investment from all sources and rate of economic growth in regions in Eastern Russia, there is practically no correlation between FDI and GRP growth. New state policy tools aimed at attracting FDI during the period under review made no significant contribution to diversification of the economy of eastern regions. In most regions, the bulk of this investment went to the minerals sector. The shares of FDI directed at the manufacturing, agriculture, construction, trade, hotels and restaurants, and the entertainment industry, since 2015, as a rule, have amounted to no more than 1% of the total Russian values in the corresponding sectors. There is no reason to believe that to date, FDI, the incentives for which were intended to create new Far Eastern institutions, have made a significant contribution to the development of a modern high-tech economy in eastern regions. The Far Eastern institutional transformation did not change the “extractive” nature of economic (and political) institutions. Economic preferences for Russia’s East to some extent have contributed to attracting investment, but mainly only in conditions of support from the federal budget and state guarantees. The authors believe that the problem of gradual transformation of institutions towards increasing their “inclusiveness” is coming to the fore. Integration at the regional level of investment policy and supporting entrepreneurship can become a significant step along this path, if Far Eastern development institutions are “reformatted” to solve this problem, providing the necessary resources.

Suggested Citation

  • I. P. Glazyrina & L. M. Faleychik & A. A. Faleychik, 2021. "Institutional Policy and the Role of Foreign Direct Investment in the Far East of Russia," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 625-637, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:rrorus:v:11:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1134_s2079970521040043
    DOI: 10.1134/S2079970521040043
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1134/S2079970521040043
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1134/S2079970521040043?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ye.А.Kolomak (ekolomak@academ.org), 2014. "Evolution of the Spatial Distribution of Economic Activities in Russia," Journal "Region: Economics and Sociology", Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering of Siberian Branch of RAS, vol. 3.
    2. Evgeniya Kolomak, 2014. "Spatial evolution of economic activity in Russia: New economic geography perspective," ERSA conference papers ersa14p95, European Regional Science Association.
    3. Ray Challen, 2000. "Institutions, Transaction Costs and Environmental Policy," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 1961.
    4. Natkhov, T. & Polishchuk, L., 2017. "Political Economy of Institutions and Development: The Importance of Being Inclusive. Reflection on "Why Nations Fail" by D. Acemoglu and J. Robinson. Part I. Institutions and Economic Devel," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 34(2), pages 12-38.
    5. Petar Kurecic & Filip Kokotovic, 2017. "The Relevance of Political Stability on FDI: A VAR Analysis and ARDL Models for Selected Small, Developed, and Instability Threatened Economies," Economies, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-21, June.
    6. Wisniewski, Tomasz P. & Pathan, Saima K., 2014. "Political environment and foreign direct investment: Evidence from OECD countries," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 13-23.
    7. Gorodnichenko, Yuriy & Svejnar, Jan & Terrell, Katherine, 2014. "When does FDI have positive spillovers? Evidence from 17 transition market economies," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 954-969.
    8. P. A. Minakir & S. N. Naiden, 2021. "Social Dynamics in the Russian Far East: Failure of the Institutional Paradigm," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 139-150, April.
    9. Ichiro Iwasaki & Keiko Suganuma, 2015. "Foreign direct investment and regional economic development in Russia: an econometric assessment," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 209-255, November.
    10. Pavel Aleksandrovich Minakir, 2019. "Far Eastern Institutional Novations: Imitation of a New Stage," Spatial Economics=Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika, Economic Research Institute, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (Khabarovsk, Russia), issue 1, pages 7-17.
    11. Marshall, Graham R., 2013. "Transaction Costs, Collective Action And Adaptation In Managing Social-Ecological Systems," 2013 Conference (57th), February 5-8, 2013, Sydney, Australia 152166, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    12. Janis Nikolaus Kluge, 2017. "Foreign direct investment, political risk and the limited access order," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 109-127, January.
    13. Natkhov, T. & Polishchuk, L., 2017. "Political Economy of Institutions and Development: The Importance of Being Inclusive. Reflection on "Why Nations Fail" by D. Acemoglu and J. Robinson. Part II. Institutional Change and Impli," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 35(3), pages 12-32.
    14. Robert Hassink, 2005. "How to unlock regional economies from path dependency? From learning region to learning cluster," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 521-535, June.
    15. M. V. Zotova & V. A. Kolosov & A. A. Gritsenko & A. B. Sebentsov & M. S. Karpenko, 2019. "Territorial Gradients of Socioeconomic Development of Russia’s Borderland," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 32-43, January.
    16. Olga Mikhailovna Prokapalo & Artyom Gennadyevich Isaev & Marina Gamilovna Mazitova & Denis Vladimirovich Suslov, 2018. "Economic Situation in the Far Eastern Federal District in 2017," Spatial Economics=Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika, Economic Research Institute, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (Khabarovsk, Russia), issue 2, pages 92-133.
    17. A. N. Pilyasov, 2019. "Regional Investment Policy: How to Overcome the Path Dependence," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 9(4), pages 340-349, October.
    18. Olga Mikhailovna Prokapalo & Anna Borisovna Bardal & Artyom Gennadyevich Isaev & Marina Gamilovna Mazitova & Denis Vladimirovich Suslov, 2019. "Economic Situation in the Far Eastern Federal District in 2018," Spatial Economics=Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika, Economic Research Institute, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (Khabarovsk, Russia), issue 2, pages 110-149.
    19. N. V. Zubarevich., 2019. "Spatial Development Strategy: Priorities and instruments," VOPROSY ECONOMIKI, N.P. Redaktsiya zhurnala "Voprosy Economiki", vol. 1.
    20. Eugenia Anatolyevna Kolomak, 2014. "Spatial Concentration of Economic Activity in Russia," Spatial Economics=Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika, Economic Research Institute, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (Khabarovsk, Russia), issue 4, pages 82-99.
    21. Svetlana Ledyaeva & Mikael Linden, 2008. "Determinants of Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from Russian Regions," European Journal of Comparative Economics, Cattaneo University (LIUC), vol. 5(1), pages 87-105, June.
    22. O. V. Kuznetsova, 2015. "Accumulated foreign investments in Russian regions: the territorial structure and the role of offshore capital," Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law, Center for Crisis Society Studies, vol. 8(6).
    23. Marshall, Graham R., 2013. "Transaction costs, collective action and adaptation in managing complex social–ecological systems," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 185-194.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. I. P. Glazyrina & L. M. Faleychik & A. A. Faleychik, 2023. "Some Results of the Russian Far East Investment Policy: Impact on the Main Sectors and Personal Incomes," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 504-513, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carlos Mario Gómez Gómez & C. D. Pérez-Blanco & David Adamson & Adam Loch, 2018. "Managing Water Scarcity at a River Basin Scale with Economic Instruments," Water Economics and Policy (WEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 4(01), pages 1-31, January.
    2. Phan, Thu-Ha Dang & Brouwer, Roy & Hoang, Long Phi & Davidson, Marc David, 2017. "A comparative study of transaction costs of payments for forest ecosystem services in Vietnam," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 141-149.
    3. Crase, Lin & O'Keefe, Sue & Dollery, Brian, 2013. "Talk is cheap, or is it? The cost of consulting about uncertain reallocation of water in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 206-213.
    4. Graham R. Marshall, 2020. "Evaluating Adaptive Efficiency in Environmental Water Recovery: Application of a Framework for Institutional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis," Water Economics and Policy (WEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 6(02), pages 1-28, April.
    5. I. P. Glazyrina & S. M. Lavlinskii, 2017. "Economic and ecological models in Russia’s mining sector," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 180-187, April.
    6. Garrick, Dustin & Whitten, Stuart M. & Coggan, Anthea, 2013. "Understanding the evolution and performance of water markets and allocation policy: A transaction costs analysis framework," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 195-205.
    7. Pavel Aleksandrovich Minakir, 2019. "Far Eastern Institutional Novations: Imitation of a New Stage," Spatial Economics=Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika, Economic Research Institute, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (Khabarovsk, Russia), issue 1, pages 7-17.
    8. Carolyn Kousky, 2014. "Managing shoreline retreat: a US perspective," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 124(1), pages 9-20, May.
    9. Kolinjivadi, Vijay & Gamboa, Gonzalo & Adamowski, Jan & Kosoy, Nicolás, 2015. "Capabilities as justice: Analysing the acceptability of payments for ecosystem services (PES) through ‘social multi-criteria evaluation’," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 99-113.
    10. Bellanger, Manuel & Fonner, Robert & Holland, Daniel S. & Libecap, Gary D. & Lipton, Douglas W. & Scemama, Pierre & Speir, Cameron & Thébaud, Olivier, 2021. "Cross-sectoral externalities related to natural resources and ecosystem services," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    11. Coggan, Anthea & Buitelaar, Edwin & Whitten, Stuart & Bennett, Jeff, 2013. "Factors that influence transaction costs in development offsets: Who bears what and why?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 222-231.
    12. Fraymovich, D. Yu. & Gundorova, M. A., 2019. "Institutional conditions for socio-economic development in Russian regions," R-Economy, Ural Federal University, Graduate School of Economics and Management, vol. 5(1), pages 5-12.
    13. Pérez-Blanco, C.D. & Gutiérrez-Martín, C., 2017. "Buy me a river: Use of multi-attribute non-linear utility functions to address overcompensation in agricultural water buyback," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 6-20.
    14. Gómez-Limón, José A. & Gutiérrez-Martín, Carlos & Montilla-López, Nazaret M., 2021. "Priority water rights. Are they useful for improving water-use efficiency at the irrigation district level?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    15. Andrea Bisceglia & Jennifer Hauver & David Berle & Jennifer Jo Thompson, 2021. "How the collaborative work of farm to school can disrupt neoliberalism in public schools," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(1), pages 59-71, February.
    16. Wegelin, Philipp & von Arx, Widar, 2016. "The impact of alternative governance forms of regional public rail transport on transaction costs. Case evidence from Germany and Switzerland," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 133-142.
    17. Nantongo, Mary & Vatn, Arild, 2019. "Estimating Transaction Costs of REDD+," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 1-11.
    18. I. P. Glazyrina & L. M. Faleychik & A. A. Faleychik, 2020. "Russia’s Eastern Border: Spatial Heterogeneity of Incomes and Problems of Population Retention," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 476-493, October.
    19. Olga Mikhailovna Prokapalo & Anna Borisovna Bardal & Artyom Gennadyevich Isaev & Marina Gamilovna Mazitova & Denis Vladimirovich Suslov, 2019. "Economic Situation in the Far Eastern Federal District in 2018," Spatial Economics=Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika, Economic Research Institute, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (Khabarovsk, Russia), issue 2, pages 110-149.
    20. Cooke, Benjamin & Moon, Katie, 2015. "Aligning ‘public good’ environmental stewardship with the landscape-scale: Adapting MBIs for private land conservation policy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 152-158.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:rrorus:v:11:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1134_s2079970521040043. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.