IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/reecde/v27y2023i4d10.1007_s10058-023-00327-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategic nomination and non-manipulable voting procedures

Author

Listed:
  • Yukinori Iwata

    (Nishogakusha University)

Abstract

We investigate the strategic manipulation of two-stage voting procedures with the nomination process. First, some alternatives are nominated by aggregating voters’ opinions, which are positive or negative views about which alternatives are eligible as candidates for collective decision-making. Subsequently, the voting outcome is chosen from the set of nominated alternatives by aggregating the voters’ preferences. We extend the notion of strategy-proofness to the two-stage voting procedures and propose its weaker version, called opinion-based strategy-proofness. We show that a Gibbard–Satterthwaite-type impossibility is still valid, but that there exists an opinion-based strategy-proof two-stage voting procedure that is strongly efficient, non-dictatorial, strongly anonymous, and nomination stable.

Suggested Citation

  • Yukinori Iwata, 2023. "Strategic nomination and non-manipulable voting procedures," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 27(4), pages 867-891, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:reecde:v:27:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s10058-023-00327-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10058-023-00327-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10058-023-00327-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10058-023-00327-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Strategic nomination; Opinion-based strategy-proofness; Two-stage voting procedure; Strategy-proofness; Gibbard–Satterthwaite theorem;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D71 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Social Choice; Clubs; Committees; Associations
    • D72 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:reecde:v:27:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s10058-023-00327-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.