IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/reaccs/v19y2014i2d10.1007_s11142-014-9276-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The quality of street cash flow from operations

Author

Listed:
  • Nerissa C. Brown

    (University of Delaware)

  • Theodore E. Christensen

    (Brigham Young University)

Abstract

We provide empirical evidence on the quality of street cash flow from operations (CFO) as an alternative financial performance summary measure. We focus our investigation on the quality of the items analysts exclude in their determination of street CFO. Based on a sample of 8,518 firm-year observations over the 1993–2008 period, we find that the street CFO number is generally higher than the GAAP CFO number, indicating that analysts typically make CFO-increasing exclusions. Our inspection of hand-collected analyst reports reveals that, while some analysts make sophisticated exclusions of transitory cash items, many others ignore working capital and other accruals when adjusting forecasted earnings to arrive at their street CFO forecasts. We find that street CFO exclusions are negatively associated with future operating earnings, suggesting that these exclusions are not fully transitory or unimportant in forecasting future performance. Our results also indicate that street CFO exclusions are less transitory than the implicit accrual component of analysts’ street earnings exclusions. These results suggest that the average quality of analysts’ street CFO exclusions is quite low and that it is even lower than the quality of their implied accrual exclusions. Moreover, we find that investors perceive analysts’ CFO exclusions to be of such low quality to render street CFO measures less informative than GAAP CFO figures. Finally, we find that analyst conflicts of interest and (to some extent) the greater inherent volatility of firms’ CFO series contribute to the low-quality nature of analysts’ street CFO exclusions.

Suggested Citation

  • Nerissa C. Brown & Theodore E. Christensen, 2014. "The quality of street cash flow from operations," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 913-954, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:reaccs:v:19:y:2014:i:2:d:10.1007_s11142-014-9276-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s11142-014-9276-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11142-014-9276-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11142-014-9276-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Theodore E. Christensen & Kenneth J. Merkley & Jennifer Wu Tucker & Shankar Venkataraman, 2011. "Do managers use earnings guidance to influence street earnings exclusions?," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 501-527, September.
    2. Michael Dambra & Charles E. Wasley & Joanna Shuang Wu, 2013. "Soft†Talk Management Cash Flow Forecasts: Bias, Quality, and Stock Price Effects," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 607-644, June.
    3. Carter, Richard B & Manaster, Steven, 1990. "Initial Public Offerings and Underwriter Reputation," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 45(4), pages 1045-1067, September.
    4. Richardson, Scott A. & Sloan, Richard G. & Soliman, Mark T. & Tuna, Irem, 2005. "Accrual reliability, earnings persistence and stock prices," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 437-485, September.
    5. Charles E. Wasley & Joanna Shuang Wu, 2006. "Why Do Managers Voluntarily Issue Cash Flow Forecasts?," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(2), pages 389-429, May.
    6. Barber, Brad M. & Lehavy, Reuven & Trueman, Brett, 2007. "Comparing the stock recommendation performance of investment banks and independent research firms," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 490-517, August.
    7. Bhattacharya, Nilabhra & Black, Ervin L. & Christensen, Theodore E. & Larson, Chad R., 2003. "Assessing the relative informativeness and permanence of pro forma earnings and GAAP operating earnings," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(1-3), pages 285-319, December.
    8. Bok Baik & David B. Farber & Kathy Petroni, 2009. "Analysts' Incentives and Street Earnings," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 47(1), pages 45-69, March.
    9. Wayne R. Landsman & Bruce L. Miller & Shu Yeh, 2007. "Implications of Components of Income Excluded from Pro Forma Earnings for Future Profitability and Equity Valuation," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3-4), pages 650-675.
    10. Andrew C. Call & Shuping Chen & Yen H. Tong, 2009. "Are analysts’ earnings forecasts more accurate when accompanied by cash flow forecasts?," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 358-391, September.
    11. Reuven Lehavy, 2009. "Discussion of “Are earnings forecasts more accurate when accompanied by cash flow forecasts?”," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 392-400, September.
    12. McInnis, John & Collins, Daniel W., 2011. "The effect of cash flow forecasts on accrual quality and benchmark beating," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 219-239, April.
    13. Patricia M. Dechow & Weili Ge, 2006. "The persistence of earnings and cash flows and the role of special items: Implications for the accrual anomaly," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 253-296, September.
    14. Lawrence Brown & Kelly Huang & Arianna Pinello, 2013. "To beat or not to beat? The importance of analysts’ cash flow forecasts," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 41(4), pages 723-752, November.
    15. Charles Hsu & William Kross, 2011. "The Market Pricing of Special Items that are Included in versus Excluded from Street Earnings," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(3), pages 990-1017, September.
    16. Yonca Ertimur & Jayanthi Sunder & Shyam V. Sunder, 2007. "Measure for Measure: The Relation between Forecast Accuracy and Recommendation Profitability of Analysts," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(3), pages 567-606, June.
    17. Mary E. Barth & Ian D. Gow & Daniel J. Taylor, 2012. "Why do pro forma and Street earnings not reflect changes in GAAP? Evidence from SFAS 123R," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 526-562, September.
    18. Nerissa C. Brown & Theodore E. Christensen & W. Brooke Elliott & Richard D. Mergenthaler, 2012. "Investor Sentiment and Pro Forma Earnings Disclosures," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 50(1), pages 1-40, March.
    19. Wayne R. Landsman & Bruce L. Miller & Shu Yeh, 2007. "Implications of Components of Income Excluded from Pro Forma Earnings for Future Profitability and Equity Valuation," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3‐4), pages 650-675, April.
    20. Vuong, Quang H, 1989. "Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-nested Hypotheses," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 57(2), pages 307-333, March.
    21. Dechow, Patricia M., 1994. "Accounting earnings and cash flows as measures of firm performance : The role of accounting accruals," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 3-42, July.
    22. DeFond, Mark L. & Hung, Mingyi, 2003. "An empirical analysis of analysts' cash flow forecasts," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 73-100, April.
    23. Dechow, Patricia M. & Kothari, S. P. & L. Watts, Ross, 1998. "The relation between earnings and cash flows," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 133-168, May.
    24. Andrew C. Call & Shuping Chen & Yen H. Tong, 2013. "Are Analysts' Cash Flow Forecasts Naïve Extensions of Their Own Earnings Forecasts?," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 438-465, June.
    25. Nelson, Karen K. & Barth, Mary E. & Cram, Donald, 2001. "Accruals and the Prediction of Future Cash Flows," Research Papers 1594r, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    26. Tim Loughran & Jay Ritter, 2004. "Why Has IPO Underpricing Changed Over Time?," Financial Management, Financial Management Association, vol. 33(3), Fall.
    27. Gu, Zhaoyang & Chen, Ting, 2004. "Analysts' treatment of nonrecurring items in street earnings," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 129-170, December.
    28. Lambert, Richard A., 2004. "Discussion of analysts' treatment of non-recurring items in street earnings and loss function assumptions in rational expectations tests on financial analysts' earnings forecasts," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 205-222, December.
    29. Lawrence D. Brown & Kumar Sivakumar, 2003. "Comparing the Value Relevance of Two Operating Income Measures," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 561-572, December.
    30. Mark T. Bradshaw & Richard G. Sloan, 2002. "GAAP versus The Street: An Empirical Assessment of Two Alternative Definitions of Earnings," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(1), pages 41-66, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mary E. Barth & Ian D. Gow & Daniel J. Taylor, 2012. "Why do pro forma and Street earnings not reflect changes in GAAP? Evidence from SFAS 123R," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 526-562, September.
    2. Sascha B. Herr & Peter Lorson & Jochen Pilhofer, 2022. "Alternative Performance Measures: A Structured Literature Review of Research in Academic and Professional Journals," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 74(3), pages 389-451, September.
    3. Qianyun Huang & Terrance R. Skantz, 2016. "The informativeness of pro forma and street earnings: an examination of information asymmetry around earnings announcements," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 198-250, March.
    4. Elmar R. Venter & David Emanuel & Steven F. Cahan, 2014. "The Value Relevance of Mandatory Non-GAAP Earnings," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 50(1), pages 1-24, March.
    5. Bradshaw, Mark T. & Christensen, Theodore E. & Gee, Kurt H. & Whipple, Benjamin C., 2018. "Analysts’ GAAP earnings forecasts and their implications for accounting research," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 46-66.
    6. Barth, Mary E. & Gow, Ian D. & Taylor, Daniel J., 2010. "Non-GAAP and Street Earnings: Evidence from SFAS 123R," Research Papers 2064, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    7. S. P. Kothari & Charles Wasley, 2019. "Commemorating the 50‐Year Anniversary of Ball and Brown (1968): The Evolution of Capital Market Research over the Past 50 Years," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 57(5), pages 1117-1159, December.
    8. Sandip Dhole & Ferdinand A. Gul & Sagarika Mishra & Ananda M. Pal, 2021. "The joint information role of analysts’ cash flow and earnings forecasts," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(1), pages 499-541, March.
    9. Frank Heflin & Charles Hsu & Qinglu Jin, 2015. "Accounting conservatism and Street earnings," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 674-709, June.
    10. Julia D’Souza & K. Ramesh & Min Shen, 2010. "Disclosure of GAAP line items in earnings announcements," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 179-219, March.
    11. Mark T. Bradshaw, 2011. "A discussion of “Do managers use earnings guidance to influence street earnings exclusions?”," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 528-538, September.
    12. Elizabeth A. Gordon & Elaine Henry & Bjorn N. Jorgensen & Cheryl L. Linthicum, 2017. "Flexibility in cash-flow classification under IFRS: determinants and consequences," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 839-872, June.
    13. Edith Leung & David Veenman, 2018. "Non‐GAAP Earnings Disclosure in Loss Firms," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 56(4), pages 1083-1137, September.
    14. Theodore E. Christensen & Kenneth J. Merkley & Jennifer Wu Tucker & Shankar Venkataraman, 2011. "Do managers use earnings guidance to influence street earnings exclusions?," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 501-527, September.
    15. Bradley Blaylock & Bradley P. Lawson & Michael A. Mayberry, 2020. "Taxable income, future profitability, and stock returns," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(7-8), pages 858-881, July.
    16. Theodore E. Christensen, 2012. "Discussion of “Why do pro forma and street earnings not reflect changes in GAAP? Evidence from SFAS 123R”," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 563-571, September.
    17. Theodore E. Christensen & Enrique Gomez & Matthew Ma & Jing Pan, 2021. "Analysts’ role in shaping non-GAAP reporting: evidence from a natural experiment," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 172-217, March.
    18. Florian Meier, 2020. "The Age of Cheap Money and Passive Investing: Are Pro Forma Earnings Value Relevant?," Journal of Finance and Investment Analysis, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 9(2), pages 1-1.
    19. Young-Soo Choi & Stephen Lin & Martin Walker & Steven Young, 2007. "Disagreement over the persistence of earnings components: evidence on the properties of management-specific adjustments to GAAP earnings," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 595-622, December.
    20. Shadi Farshadfar & Reza Monem, 2013. "The usefulness of operating cash flow and accrual components in improving the predictive ability of earnings: a re-examination and extension," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 53(4), pages 1061-1082, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D84 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Expectations; Speculations
    • G17 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Financial Forecasting and Simulation
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:reaccs:v:19:y:2014:i:2:d:10.1007_s11142-014-9276-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.