IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/reaccs/v12y2007i4d10.1007_s11142-007-9048-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Disagreement over the persistence of earnings components: evidence on the properties of management-specific adjustments to GAAP earnings

Author

Listed:
  • Young-Soo Choi

    (Lancaster University)

  • Stephen Lin

    (Florida International University)

  • Martin Walker

    (University of Manchester)

  • Steven Young

    (Lancaster University)

Abstract

We examine disagreement between management and Thomson Datastream over the persistence of earnings components. Using income statement and footnote disclosures, we identify the source and properties of disputed items. Disagreements typically reflect opaque reporting practices (for example, in the case of transitory operating items) and restrictive classification rules (for example, in the case of discontinued operations). Incremental and relative value relevance tests suggest that the majority of management-specific adjustments reflect appropriate classification of earnings components by insiders. Nevertheless, evidence consistent with strategic disclosure does emerge for a subset of management adjustments.

Suggested Citation

  • Young-Soo Choi & Stephen Lin & Martin Walker & Steven Young, 2007. "Disagreement over the persistence of earnings components: evidence on the properties of management-specific adjustments to GAAP earnings," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 595-622, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:reaccs:v:12:y:2007:i:4:d:10.1007_s11142-007-9048-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s11142-007-9048-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11142-007-9048-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11142-007-9048-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeffrey T. Doyle & Russell J. Lundholm & Mark T. Soliman, 2003. "The Predictive Value of Expenses Excluded from Pro Forma Earnings," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 145-174, June.
    2. Bhattacharya, Nilabhra & Black, Ervin L. & Christensen, Theodore E. & Larson, Chad R., 2003. "Assessing the relative informativeness and permanence of pro forma earnings and GAAP operating earnings," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(1-3), pages 285-319, December.
    3. Lipe, Rc, 1986. "The Information Contained In The Components Of Earnings," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24, pages 37-64.
    4. David C. Burgstahler & Michael J. Eames, 2003. "Earnings Management to Avoid Losses and Earnings Decreases: Are Analysts Fooled?," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2), pages 253-294, June.
    5. W. Bruce Johnson & William C. Schwartz, 2005. "Are Investors Misled by “Pro Forma†Earnings?," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(4), pages 915-963, December.
    6. Martin Walker & Evagelia Louvari, 2003. "The determinants of voluntary disclosure of adjusted earnings per share measures by UK quoted companies," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 295-309.
    7. Ana Marques, 2006. "SEC interventions and the frequency and usefulness of non-GAAP financial measures," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 549-574, December.
    8. Vuong, Quang H, 1989. "Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-nested Hypotheses," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 57(2), pages 307-333, March.
    9. Collins, Daniel W. & Maydew, Edward L. & Weiss, Ira S., 1997. "Changes in the value-relevance of earnings and book values over the past forty years," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 39-67, December.
    10. Gu, Zhaoyang & Chen, Ting, 2004. "Analysts' treatment of nonrecurring items in street earnings," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 129-170, December.
    11. Lawrence D. Brown & Kumar Sivakumar, 2003. "Comparing the Value Relevance of Two Operating Income Measures," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 561-572, December.
    12. Stephen Lin & Martin Walker, 2000. "FRS3 earnings, Headline earnings, and accounting-based valuation models," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(4), pages 299-306.
    13. Mark T. Bradshaw & Richard G. Sloan, 2002. "GAAP versus The Street: An Empirical Assessment of Two Alternative Definitions of Earnings," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(1), pages 41-66, March.
    14. Mary E. Barth & Sanjay Kallapur, 1996. "The Effects of Cross†Sectional Scale Differences on Regression Results in Empirical Accounting Research," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(2), pages 527-567, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Theodore E. Christensen & Kenneth J. Merkley & Jennifer Wu Tucker & Shankar Venkataraman, 2011. "Do managers use earnings guidance to influence street earnings exclusions?," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 501-527, September.
    2. Mark T. Bradshaw, 2011. "A discussion of “Do managers use earnings guidance to influence street earnings exclusions?”," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 528-538, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mark T. Bradshaw, 2011. "A discussion of “Do managers use earnings guidance to influence street earnings exclusions?”," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 528-538, September.
    2. Jeffery S. Abarbanell & Reuven Lehavy, 2007. "Letting the “Tail Wag the Dog†: The Debate over GAAP versus Street Earnings Revisited," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3), pages 675-723, September.
    3. Chih-Ying Chen, 2010. "Do analysts and investors fully understand the persistence of the items excluded from Street earnings?," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 32-69, March.
    4. Mary E. Barth & Ian D. Gow & Daniel J. Taylor, 2012. "Why do pro forma and Street earnings not reflect changes in GAAP? Evidence from SFAS 123R," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 526-562, September.
    5. Theodore E. Christensen & Kenneth J. Merkley & Jennifer Wu Tucker & Shankar Venkataraman, 2011. "Do managers use earnings guidance to influence street earnings exclusions?," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 501-527, September.
    6. Theodore E. Christensen, 2012. "Discussion of “Why do pro forma and street earnings not reflect changes in GAAP? Evidence from SFAS 123R”," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 563-571, September.
    7. Richard Frankel & Sarah McVay & Mark Soliman, 2011. "Non-GAAP earnings and board independence," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 719-744, December.
    8. Ana Marques, 2006. "SEC interventions and the frequency and usefulness of non-GAAP financial measures," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 549-574, December.
    9. Edward J. Riedl & Suraj Srinivasan, 2007. "Signaling Firm Performance Through Financial Statement Presentation: An Analysis Using Special Items," Harvard Business School Working Papers 09-031, Harvard Business School.
    10. Nerissa C. Brown & Theodore E. Christensen, 2014. "The quality of street cash flow from operations," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 913-954, June.
    11. Higgins, Huong, 2013. "Can securities analysts forecast intangible firms’ earnings?," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 155-174.
    12. Frank Heflin & Charles Hsu & Qinglu Jin, 2015. "Accounting conservatism and Street earnings," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 674-709, June.
    13. Wang, Qian & Ettredge, Michael, 2015. "Discretionary allocation of corporate income to segments," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 1-13.
    14. Steven Young, 2014. "The drivers, consequences and policy implications of non-GAAP earnings reporting," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(4), pages 444-465, August.
    15. Silvia Gardini & F. Marta L. Di Lascio & Franco Visani, 2017. "Opportunism in disclosing pro-forma indicators: rationale and contextual drivers," BEMPS - Bozen Economics & Management Paper Series BEMPS42, Faculty of Economics and Management at the Free University of Bozen.
    16. Frank Heflin & Kalin S. Kolev & Benjamin Whipple, 2024. "The risk-relevance of non-GAAP earnings," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 493-524, March.
    17. Elmar R. Venter & David Emanuel & Steven F. Cahan, 2014. "The Value Relevance of Mandatory Non-GAAP Earnings," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 50(1), pages 1-24, March.
    18. Bradshaw, Mark T. & Christensen, Theodore E. & Gee, Kurt H. & Whipple, Benjamin C., 2018. "Analysts’ GAAP earnings forecasts and their implications for accounting research," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 46-66.
    19. Shanshan Pan & Michael Lacina & Haeyoung Shin, 2019. "Income Classification Shifting and Financial Analysts’ Forecasts," Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (RPBFMP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(02), pages 1-48, June.
    20. Daniel W. Collins & Oliver Zhen Li & Hong Xie, 2009. "What drives the increased informativeness of earnings announcements over time?," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-30, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M4 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:reaccs:v:12:y:2007:i:4:d:10.1007_s11142-007-9048-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.