IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/reaccs/v15y2010i1d10.1007_s11142-008-9079-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do analysts and investors fully understand the persistence of the items excluded from Street earnings?

Author

Listed:
  • Chih-Ying Chen

    (Singapore Management University)

Abstract

Previous research has found that the items that are included in GAAP earnings but excluded from Street earnings to allow the firm to meet or beat analyst earnings forecasts (“MBF exclusions”) are more persistent than the other excluded items. In this study, I find that the difference in the levels of persistence between MBF and non-MBF exclusions declined after the introduction of Regulation G, which requires public companies that disclose non-GAAP earnings to also present GAAP earnings and a reconciliation of the two. Analysts underestimate the persistence of non-MBF exclusions, but the degree of this underestimation is lower in the post-regulation period. In contrast, there is little evidence to indicate that analysts underestimate the persistence of MBF exclusions in either time period. I also find strong (weak) evidence that investors underestimate the persistence of Street exclusions in the pre- (post-) regulation period. These results suggest that Regulation G constrains the practice of excluding recurring expenses from Street earnings to meet or beat analyst forecasts and helps analysts and investors to understand the persistence of Street exclusions.

Suggested Citation

  • Chih-Ying Chen, 2010. "Do analysts and investors fully understand the persistence of the items excluded from Street earnings?," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 32-69, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:reaccs:v:15:y:2010:i:1:d:10.1007_s11142-008-9079-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s11142-008-9079-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11142-008-9079-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11142-008-9079-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frederic S. Mishkin, 1983. "A Rational Expectations Approach to Macroeconometrics: Testing Policy Ineffectiveness and Efficient-Markets Models," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number mish83-1.
    2. Mikhail, MB & Walther, BR & Willis, RH, 1997. "Do security analysts improve their performance with experience?," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35, pages 131-157.
    3. Jeffrey T. Doyle & Russell J. Lundholm & Mark T. Soliman, 2003. "The Predictive Value of Expenses Excluded from Pro Forma Earnings," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 145-174, June.
    4. Bhattacharya, Nilabhra & Black, Ervin L. & Christensen, Theodore E. & Larson, Chad R., 2003. "Assessing the relative informativeness and permanence of pro forma earnings and GAAP operating earnings," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(1-3), pages 285-319, December.
    5. Mikhail, Michael B. & Walther, Beverly R. & Willis, Richard H., 2003. "The effect of experience on security analyst underreaction," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 101-116, April.
    6. David Burgstahler & James Jiambalvo & Terry Shevlin, 2002. "Do Stock Prices Fully Reflect the Implications of Special Items for Future Earnings?," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(3), pages 585-612, June.
    7. Harrison Hong & Jeffrey D. Kubik, 2003. "Analyzing the Analysts: Career Concerns and Biased Earnings Forecasts," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 58(1), pages 313-351, February.
    8. William H. Beaver & Maureen F. McNichols, 2001. "Do Stock Prices of Property Casualty Insurers Fully Reflect Information about Earnings, Accruals, Cash Flows, and Development?," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 197-220, June.
    9. Ana Marques, 2006. "SEC interventions and the frequency and usefulness of non-GAAP financial measures," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 549-574, December.
    10. Arthur Kraft & Andrew J. Leone & Charles E. Wasley, 2007. "Regression‐Based Tests of the Market Pricing of Accounting Numbers: The Mishkin Test and Ordinary Least Squares," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(5), pages 1081-1114, December.
    11. Frederic S. Mishkin, 1983. "Introduction to "A Rational Expectations Approach to Macroeconometrics: Testing Policy Ineffectiveness and Efficient-Markets Models"," NBER Chapters, in: A Rational Expectations Approach to Macroeconometrics: Testing Policy Ineffectiveness and Efficient-Markets Models, pages 1-6, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Gu, Zhaoyang & Chen, Ting, 2004. "Analysts' treatment of nonrecurring items in street earnings," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 129-170, December.
    13. Daniel A. Cohen & Rebecca N. Hann & Maria Ogneva, 2007. "Another look at GAAP versus the Street: an empirical assessment of measurement error bias," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 271-303, September.
    14. Lawrence D. Brown & Kumar Sivakumar, 2003. "Comparing the Value Relevance of Two Operating Income Measures," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 561-572, December.
    15. Mark T. Bradshaw & Richard G. Sloan, 2002. "GAAP versus The Street: An Empirical Assessment of Two Alternative Definitions of Earnings," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(1), pages 41-66, March.
    16. Mark T. Bradshaw & Scott A. Richardson & Richard G. Sloan, 2001. "Do Analysts and Auditors Use Information in Accruals?," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(1), pages 45-74, June.
    17. Chaney, Paul K. & Hogan, Chris E. & Jeter, Debra C., 1999. "The effect of reporting restructuring charges on analysts' forecast revisions and errors," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 261-284, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Richard Frankel & Sarah McVay & Mark Soliman, 2011. "Non-GAAP earnings and board independence," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 719-744, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mark T. Bradshaw, 2011. "A discussion of “Do managers use earnings guidance to influence street earnings exclusions?”," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 528-538, September.
    2. Theodore E. Christensen & Kenneth J. Merkley & Jennifer Wu Tucker & Shankar Venkataraman, 2011. "Do managers use earnings guidance to influence street earnings exclusions?," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 501-527, September.
    3. Theodore E. Christensen, 2012. "Discussion of “Why do pro forma and street earnings not reflect changes in GAAP? Evidence from SFAS 123R”," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 563-571, September.
    4. Ramnath, Sundaresh & Rock, Steve & Shane, Philip, 2008. "The financial analyst forecasting literature: A taxonomy with suggestions for further research," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 34-75.
    5. Young-Soo Choi & Stephen Lin & Martin Walker & Steven Young, 2007. "Disagreement over the persistence of earnings components: evidence on the properties of management-specific adjustments to GAAP earnings," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 595-622, December.
    6. Frank Heflin & Charles Hsu & Qinglu Jin, 2015. "Accounting conservatism and Street earnings," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 674-709, June.
    7. Mary E. Barth & Ian D. Gow & Daniel J. Taylor, 2012. "Why do pro forma and Street earnings not reflect changes in GAAP? Evidence from SFAS 123R," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 526-562, September.
    8. Beyer, Anne & Cohen, Daniel A. & Lys, Thomas Z. & Walther, Beverly R., 2010. "The financial reporting environment: Review of the recent literature," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(2-3), pages 296-343, December.
    9. Patricia M. Dechow & Weili Ge, 2006. "The persistence of earnings and cash flows and the role of special items: Implications for the accrual anomaly," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 253-296, September.
    10. Dana Hollie & Philip B. Shane & Qiuhong Zhao & Steven Cahan, 2017. "The role of financial analysts in stock market efficiency with respect to annual earnings and its cash and accrual components," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 57(1), pages 199-237, March.
    11. Ana Marques, 2006. "SEC interventions and the frequency and usefulness of non-GAAP financial measures," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 549-574, December.
    12. Lu, Hsueh-Tien, 2018. "Voluntary disclosure and the pricing of earnings components," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 64-73.
    13. Kevin Ke Li, 2011. "How well do investors understand loss persistence?," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 630-667, September.
    14. Richard Frankel & Sarah McVay & Mark Soliman, 2011. "Non-GAAP earnings and board independence," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 719-744, December.
    15. Jeffery S. Abarbanell & Reuven Lehavy, 2007. "Letting the “Tail Wag the Dog†: The Debate over GAAP versus Street Earnings Revisited," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3), pages 675-723, September.
    16. Jeffrey J. Coulton & Caitlin M. S. Ruddock & Stephen L. Taylor, 2014. "The Informativeness of Dividends and Associated Tax Credits," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(9-10), pages 1309-1336, November.
    17. Venter, Elmar R. & Cahan, Steven F. & Emanuel, David, 2013. "Mandatory Earnings Disaggregation and the Persistence and Pricing of Earnings Components," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 26-53.
    18. Edward J. Riedl & Estelle Y. Sun & Guannan Wang, 2021. "Sentiment, Loss Firms, and Investor Expectations of Future Earnings," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(1), pages 518-544, March.
    19. Frank Heflin & Kalin S. Kolev & Benjamin Whipple, 2024. "The risk-relevance of non-GAAP earnings," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 493-524, March.
    20. Shanshan Pan & Michael Lacina & Haeyoung Shin, 2019. "Income Classification Shifting and Financial Analysts’ Forecasts," Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (RPBFMP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(02), pages 1-48, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:reaccs:v:15:y:2010:i:1:d:10.1007_s11142-008-9079-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.