IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/reaccs/v14y2009i2d10.1007_s11142-009-9090-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discussion of “Are earnings forecasts more accurate when accompanied by cash flow forecasts?”

Author

Listed:
  • Reuven Lehavy

    (University of Michigan)

Abstract

Call et al. (Rev Account Stud 2009, this issue) demonstrate that, relative to analysts who issue earnings but not cash flow forecasts, analysts who issue both forecasts (i) produce relatively more accurate earnings forecasts, (ii) have a better understanding of the persistence of current earnings, and (iii) are less likely to get fired. In my discussion, I highlight some general challenges facing research on analyst cash flow forecasts, demonstrate the diminishing difference in the relative accuracy over time (including its compete elimination by 2004), and examine the sensitivity of some of the evidence in Call et al. (2009) to the age of the forecast and to the presence of extreme bad-news earnings surprises.

Suggested Citation

  • Reuven Lehavy, 2009. "Discussion of “Are earnings forecasts more accurate when accompanied by cash flow forecasts?”," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 392-400, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:reaccs:v:14:y:2009:i:2:d:10.1007_s11142-009-9090-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s11142-009-9090-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11142-009-9090-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11142-009-9090-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. DeFond, Mark L. & Hung, Mingyi, 2003. "An empirical analysis of analysts' cash flow forecasts," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 73-100, April.
    2. Mark L. DeFond & Mingyi Hung, 2007. "Investor protection and analysts’ cash flow forecasts around the world," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 377-419, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nerissa C. Brown & Theodore E. Christensen, 2014. "The quality of street cash flow from operations," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 913-954, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nagar, Neerav & Sen, Kaustav, 2016. "Earnings management in India: Managers’ fixation on operating profits," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 1-12.
    2. Ahsan Habib & Mabel D' Costa & Hedy Jiaying Huang & Md. Borhan Uddin Bhuiyan & Li Sun, 2020. "Determinants and consequences of financial distress: review of the empirical literature," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(S1), pages 1023-1075, April.
    3. Sabri Boubaker & Florence Labégorre, 2006. "L’environnement informationnel et la structure de propriété et de contrôle des sociétés cotées françaises," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 9(3), pages 5-38, September.
    4. Gus De Franco & S.P. Kothari & Rodrigo S. Verdi, 2011. "The Benefits of Financial Statement Comparability," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 49(4), pages 895-931, September.
    5. Dhole, Sandip & Lobo, Gerald J. & Mishra, Sagarika & Pal, Ananda M., 2015. "Effects of the SEC's XBRL mandate on financial reporting comparability," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 29-44.
    6. Cory A. Cassell & Lauren M. Cunningham & Ling Lei Lisic, 2019. "The readability of company responses to SEC comment letters and SEC 10-K filing review outcomes," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 1252-1276, December.
    7. Truc (Peter) Do & Kathleen Herbohn, 2024. "The impact of board ethnic diversity and Chief Executive Officer role on corporate social responsibility," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 64(1), pages 575-605, March.
    8. Louise Yi Lu & Greg Shailer & Yangxin Yu, 2017. "Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and the Value of Cash Holdings," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 729-753, October.
    9. Sandip Dhole & Ferdinand A. Gul & Sagarika Mishra & Ananda M. Pal, 2021. "The joint information role of analysts’ cash flow and earnings forecasts," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(1), pages 499-541, March.
    10. Yang, Daecheon & Kim, Hyuntae, 2020. "Managerial overconfidence and manipulation of operating cash flow: Evidence from Korea✰," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 32(C).
    11. Andrew C. Call & Shuping Chen & Yen H. Tong, 2009. "Are analysts’ earnings forecasts more accurate when accompanied by cash flow forecasts?," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 358-391, September.
    12. Misund, Bård, 2015. "Reserves Replacement and Oil and Gas Company Shareholder returns," UiS Working Papers in Economics and Finance 2015/11, University of Stavanger.
    13. Xiaomeng Chen & Meiting Lu & Yaowen Shan & Yizhou Zhang, 2021. "Australian evidence on analysts' cash flow forecasts: issuance, accuracy and usefulness," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(1), pages 3-50, March.
    14. Hyun Min Oh & Sam Bock Park & Jong Hyun Kim, 2020. "Do Analysts’ Cash Flow Forecasts Improve Firm Value?," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-25, October.
    15. Probowo Erawan Sastroredjo & Marcel Ausloos & Polina Khrennikova, 2025. "Environmental Performance, Financial Constraint and Tax Avoidance Practices: Insights from FTSE All-Share Companies," Papers 2509.08450, arXiv.org.
    16. Sepulveda Velasquez, Jorge, 2021. "Bibliometric Review of Research in Financial Health," MPRA Paper 111353, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Benzion Barlev & Dov Fried & Joshua Rene Haddad & Joshua Livnat, 2007. "Reevaluation of Revaluations: A Cross‐Country Examination of the Motives and Effects on Future Performance," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(7‐8), pages 1025-1050, September.
    18. Dimos Andronoudis & Diogenis Baboukardos & Fanis Tsoligkas, 2024. "How the information content of integrated reporting flows into the stock market," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(1), pages 1057-1078, January.
    19. Philip G. Berger, 2003. "Discussion of “Differential Market Reactions to Revenue and Expense Surprises”," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 213-220, June.
    20. Julia D’Souza & K. Ramesh & Min Shen, 2010. "Disclosure of GAAP line items in earnings announcements," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 179-219, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G24 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Investment Banking; Venture Capital; Brokerage
    • G29 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Other
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:reaccs:v:14:y:2009:i:2:d:10.1007_s11142-009-9090-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.