IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v59y2025i2d10.1007_s11135-025-02059-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why diverse boards are market game-changers: driving the sustainable future from the lens of proactive eco-innovation for firm market performance

Author

Listed:
  • Md. Abu Toha

    (National University
    University of Cambridge
    Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS)

  • Satirenjit Kaur Johl

    (Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS)

  • Parvez Alam Khan

    (Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS)

  • Mohd Salim

    (Aligarh Muslim University
    International Institute of Business Study)

Abstract

Reactive Eco-innovation (REI) has gained considerable attention due to its potential to mitigate sustainability issues. However, post-COVID, there is a need to unlearn reactive behavior and relearn proactive behavior in innovative activities. Proactive eco-innovation (PEI) is hope or hype for the firm is yet to be explored. The prime objective of this study is to examine the impact of proactive eco-innovation on firm market performance (FMP). This research also investigated the moderation role of independent directors (ID) and women's diversity in provocative eco-innovation. This study bridges the gap by developing a proactive eco-innovation index for the energy sector to outperform the five (5) years of panel data of 31 listed firms at Bursa Malaysia. The findings showed that proactive eco-innovation has a direct relationship with FMP. The findings also found that independent directors moderate the relationship between proactive eco-innovation and FMP. In contrast, women's diversity has no moderating effect on the relationship above. The findings suggest corporations and policymakers should adopt proactiveness in eco-innovation practices due to their cost advantage and pollution-prevention potential.

Suggested Citation

  • Md. Abu Toha & Satirenjit Kaur Johl & Parvez Alam Khan & Mohd Salim, 2025. "Why diverse boards are market game-changers: driving the sustainable future from the lens of proactive eco-innovation for firm market performance," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 1253-1282, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:59:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11135-025-02059-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-025-02059-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-025-02059-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-025-02059-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matos, Stelvia & Viardot, Eric & Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Geels, Frank W. & Xiong, Yu, 2022. "Innovation and climate change: A review and introduction to the special issue," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    2. Balsmeier, Benjamin & Buchwald, Achim & Stiebale, Joel, 2014. "Outside directors on the board and innovative firm performance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(10), pages 1800-1815.
    3. Muhammad Zahid & Syeda Um-Ul-Baneen Naqvi & Amin Jan & Haseeb Ur Rahman & Said Wali, 2023. "The nexus of environmental, social, and governance practices with the financial performance of banks: A comparative analysis for the pre and COVID-19 periods," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 2183654-218, December.
    4. Rohail Hassan & Maran Marimuthu, 2016. "Corporate Governance, Board Diversity, and Firm Value: Examining Large Companies Using Panel Data Approach," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 36(3), pages 1737-1750.
    5. Eugenio Zubeltzu‐Jaka & Igor Álvarez‐Etxeberria & Eduardo Ortas, 2020. "The effect of the size of the board of directors on corporate social performance: A meta‐analytic approach," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 1361-1374, May.
    6. Uribe-Bohorquez, María-Victoria & Martínez-Ferrero, Jennifer & García-Sánchez, Isabel-María, 2018. "Board independence and firm performance: The moderating effect of institutional context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 28-43.
    7. Tariq, Adeel & Badir, Yuosre F. & Tariq, Waqas & Bhutta, Umair Saeed, 2017. "Drivers and consequences of green product and process innovation: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future outlook," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 8-23.
    8. Satirenjit Kaur Johl & Md Abu Toha, 2021. "The Nexus between Proactive Eco-Innovation and Firm Financial Performance: A Circular Economy Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, June.
    9. Azzopardi, Ernest & Nash, Robert, 2013. "A critical evaluation of importance–performance analysis," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 222-233.
    10. Helena Isidro & Márcia Sobral, 2015. "The Effects of Women on Corporate Boards on Firm Value, Financial Performance, and Ethical and Social Compliance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 132(1), pages 1-19, November.
    11. Arundel, A & Kemp, Rene, 2009. "Measuring eco-innovation," Working Papers 10062, University of Tasmania, Tasmanian School of Business and Economics, revised 30 Aug 2010.
    12. Balsmeier, Benjamin & Fleming, Lee & Manso, Gustavo, 2017. "Independent boards and innovation," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(3), pages 536-557.
    13. Adam Ryszko, 2016. "Proactive Environmental Strategy, Technological Eco-Innovation and Firm Performance—Case of Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-20, February.
    14. Muhammad Zahid & Mutahar Hayat & Haseeb Ur Rahman & Wajahat Ali, 2024. "Is the financial industry ready for circular economy and sustainable development goals? A case of a developing country," Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 16(5), pages 962-992, February.
    15. María Rodríguez-García & María Guijarro-García & Agustín Carrilero-Castillo, 2019. "An Overview of Ecopreneurship, Eco-Innovation, and the Ecological Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, May.
    16. David Ferreira Lopes Santos & Melissa Machado De Lima & Leonardo Fernando Cruz Basso & Herbert Kimura & Vinicius Amorim Sobreiro, 2017. "Eco-innovation and financial performance at companies established in Brazil," International Journal of Business and Emerging Markets, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(1), pages 68-89.
    17. Ayça Kubra Hizarci‐Payne & İlayda İpek & Gülüzar Kurt Gümüş, 2021. "How environmental innovation influences firm performance: A meta‐analytic review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 1174-1190, February.
    18. Gemma Durán-Romero & Ana López & Tatiana Beliaeva & Marcos Ferasso & Christophe Garonne & Paul Jones, 2020. "Bridging the gap between circular economy and climate change mitigation policies through eco-innovations and Quintuple Helix Model," Post-Print hal-04278169, HAL.
    19. Parvez Alam Khan & Satirenjit Kaur Johl & Shakeb Akhtar, 2022. "Vinculum of Sustainable Development Goal Practices and Firms’ Financial Performance: A Moderation Role of Green Innovation," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-24, February.
    20. Christoph P. Kiefer & Pablo del Río & Javier Carrillo‐Hermosilla, 2021. "On the contribution of eco‐innovation features to a circular economy: A microlevel quantitative approach," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1531-1547, May.
    21. Priya Shah & Richa Singh Dubey & Shashikant Rai & Douglas W. S. Renwick & Saurabh Misra, 2024. "Green human resource management: A comprehensive investigation using bibliometric analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 31-53, January.
    22. Liu, Yu & Miletkov, Mihail K. & Wei, Zuobao & Yang, Tina, 2015. "Board independence and firm performance in China," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 223-244.
    23. Kuen‐Hung Tsai & Chi‐Tsun Huang & Zi‐Hyo Chen, 2020. "Understanding variation in the relationship between environmental management practices and firm performance across studies: A meta‐analytic review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 547-565, February.
    24. Pelin Demirel & Gamze Ozturk Danisman, 2019. "Eco-Innovation and Firm Growth in the Circular Economy: Evidence from European SMEs," SPRU Working Paper Series 2019-13, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    25. Zailani, Suhaiza & Jeyaraman, K. & Vengadasan, G. & Premkumar, R., 2012. "Sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) in Malaysia: A survey," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 330-340.
    26. Nuria Reguera-Alvarado & Pilar Fuentes & Joaquina Laffarga, 2017. "Does Board Gender Diversity Influence Financial Performance? Evidence from Spain," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 141(2), pages 337-350, March.
    27. Durán-Romero, Gemma & López, Ana M. & Beliaeva, Tatiana & Ferasso, Marcos & Garonne, Christophe & Jones, Paul, 2020. "Bridging the gap between circular economy and climate change mitigation policies through eco-innovations and Quintuple Helix Model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    28. Mihaela Ionascu & Ion Ionascu & Marian Sacarin & Mihaela Minu, 2018. "Women on Boards and Financial Performance: Evidence from a European Emerging Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    29. Christy Glass & Alison Cook & Alicia R. Ingersoll, 2016. "Do Women Leaders Promote Sustainability? Analyzing the Effect of Corporate Governance Composition on Environmental Performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(7), pages 495-511, November.
    30. Malikov, Kamran & Demirbag, Mehmet & Kuvandikov, Azimjon & Manson, Stuart, 2021. "Workforce reductions and post-merger operating performance: The role of corporate governance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 109-120.
    31. Pelin Demirel & Gamze Ozturk Danisman, 2019. "Eco‐innovation and firm growth in the circular economy: Evidence from European small‐ and medium‐sized enterprises," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(8), pages 1608-1618, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fabio De Felice & Antonella Petrillo, 2021. "Green Transition: The Frontier of the Digicircular Economy Evidenced from a Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-26, October.
    2. Satirenjit Kaur Johl & Md Abu Toha, 2021. "The Nexus between Proactive Eco-Innovation and Firm Financial Performance: A Circular Economy Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, June.
    3. Gnekpe, Christian & Plantec, Quentin, 2023. "Regulatory push-pull and technological knowledge dynamics of circular economy innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    4. Pei Chu & Mohamed Elsayed & Yousry Ahmed, 2025. "Do women in the boardroom influence foreign acquisitions' premium and outcomes? Evidence from China," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(2), pages 1163-1189, April.
    5. Triguero, A. & Córcoles, D., 2025. "Leveraging eco-innovation and market knowledge for a circular economy transition: Insights from Spanish manufacturing firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    6. Paola Belingheri & Filippo Chiarello & Andrea Fronzetti Colladon & Paola Rovelli, 2021. "Twenty years of gender equality research: A scoping review based on a new semantic indicator," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-27, September.
    7. Aruoriwo Marian Chijoke-Mgbame & Agyenim Boateng & Chijoke Oscar Mgbame, 2020. "Board gender diversity, audit committee and financial performance: evidence from Nigeria," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(3), pages 262-286, July.
    8. Moez Bennouri & Anastasia Cozarenco & Samuel Anokye Nyarko, 2024. "Women on Boards and Performance Trade-offs in Social Enterprises: Insights from Microfinance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 190(1), pages 165-198, February.
    9. Felix Carl Schultz & Robert Jaroslav Reinhardt, 2022. "Facilitating systemic eco‐innovation to pave the way for a circular economy: A qualitative‐empirical study on barriers and drivers in the European polyurethane industry," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(5), pages 1646-1675, October.
    10. Jingsheng Lei & Sha Lin & M. Riaz Khan & Siman Xie & Muhammad Sadiq & Rashid Ali & Muhammad Farhan Bashir & Luqman Shahzad & Sayed M. Eldin & Ali H. Amin, 2022. "Research Trends of Board Characteristics and Firms’ Environmental Performance: Research Directions and Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-25, November.
    11. María del Carmen Valls Martínez & Pedro Antonio Martín Cervantes & Salvador Cruz Rambaud, 2020. "Women on corporate boards and sustainable development in the American and European markets: Is there a limit to gender policies?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2642-2656, November.
    12. Li, Yunhe & Liu, Yu & Xie, Feixue, 2019. "Technology directors and firm innovation," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 76-88.
    13. Milagros Gutiérrez-Fernández & Yakira Fernández-Torres, 2020. "Does Gender Diversity Influence Business Efficiency? An Analysis from the Social Perspective of CSR," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, May.
    14. Simona Galletta & Sebastiano Mazzù & Valeria Naciti & Carlo Vermiglio, 2022. "Gender diversity and sustainability performance in the banking industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1), pages 161-174, January.
    15. Benkraiem, Ramzi & Boubaker, Sabri & Brinette, Souad & Khemiri, Sabrina, 2021. "Board feminization and innovation through corporate venture capital investments: The moderating effects of independence and management skills," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    16. Ana Labella-Fernández & M. Mar Serrano-Arcos & Belén Payán-Sánchez, 2021. "Firm Growth as a Driver of Sustainable Product Innovation: Mediation and Moderation Analysis. Evidence from Manufacturing Firms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-22, March.
    17. Francesco Gangi & Antonio Meles & Eugenio D'Angelo & Lucia Michela Daniele, 2019. "Sustainable development and corporate governance in the financial system: Are environmentally friendly banks less risky?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3), pages 529-547, May.
    18. Meles, Antonio & Salerno, Dario & Sampagnaro, Gabriele & Verdoliva, Vincenzo & Zhang, Jianing, 2023. "The influence of green innovation on default risk: Evidence from Europe," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 692-710.
    19. Ben Slimane, Faten & Padilla Angulo, Laura, 2019. "Strategic change and corporate governance: Evidence from the stock exchange industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 206-218.
    20. Nadia Loukil & Ouidad Yousfi, 2022. "Do CEO’s traits matter in innovation outcomes?," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 375-403, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:59:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11135-025-02059-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.