IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v58y2024i5d10.1007_s11135-024-01875-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Asking—and answering—causal questions using longitudinal data

Author

Listed:
  • Rafael Quintana

    (University of Kansas)

Abstract

Despite a growing availability of longitudinal datasets, it can be difficult to select the most appropriate modelling strategy. In particular, there is little guidance regarding which causal questions one can ask using longitudinal data, and what is the best way to answer these questions. This paper distinguishes between three causal quantities that researchers in social and behavioral sciences often want to investigate: the contemporaneous treatment effect, the cumulative treatment effect, and the long-term treatment effect. I provide a definition of these quantities, clarify which causal assumptions are needed to identify these effects, and present statistical models that can be used to estimate these quantities. The aim is to provide an accessible overview of longitudinal models for estimating causal effects using observational data. I illustrate the methods discussed by studying how peer victimization in school affects internalizing behaviors. For this purpose, I used a nationally representative sample of kindergarteners, and focused on peer victimization events from 2nd to 5th grades. Consistent with prior research, the results suggest that peer victimization has short-run, cumulative, and long-term effects on internalizing behaviors.

Suggested Citation

  • Rafael Quintana, 2024. "Asking—and answering—causal questions using longitudinal data," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(5), pages 4679-4701, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:58:y:2024:i:5:d:10.1007_s11135-024-01875-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-024-01875-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-024-01875-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-024-01875-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:58:y:2024:i:5:d:10.1007_s11135-024-01875-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.