IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v76y2011i4p650-669.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Geometric Analysis of When Fixed Weighting Schemes Will Outperform Ordinary Least Squares

Author

Listed:
  • Clintin Davis-Stober

    ()

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Clintin Davis-Stober, 2011. "A Geometric Analysis of When Fixed Weighting Schemes Will Outperform Ordinary Least Squares," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 76(4), pages 650-669, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:76:y:2011:i:4:p:650-669
    DOI: 10.1007/s11336-011-9229-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11336-011-9229-1
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Niels Waller & Jeff Jones, 2011. "Investigating the Performance of Alternate Regression Weights by Studying All Possible Criteria in Regression Models with a Fixed Set of Predictors," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 76(3), pages 410-439, July.
    2. Howard Wainer & David Thissen, 1976. "Three steps towards robust regression," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 41(1), pages 9-34, March.
    3. Manel Baucells & Juan A. Carrasco & Robin M. Hogarth, 2008. "Cumulative Dominance and Heuristic Performance in Binary Multiattribute Choice," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(5), pages 1289-1304, October.
    4. Niels Waller & Jeff Jones, 2010. "Correlation Weights in Multiple Regression," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 75(1), pages 58-69, March.
    5. Robin Hogarth & Natalia Karelaia, 2003. "Take-the-best and other simple strategies: Why and when they work 'well' in binary choice," Economics Working Papers 709, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    6. F. Hutton Barron & Bruce E. Barrett, 1996. "Decision Quality Using Ranked Attribute Weights," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(11), pages 1515-1523, November.
    7. S. Wilks, 1938. "Weighting systems for linear functions of correlated variables when there is no dependent variable," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 3(1), pages 23-40, March.
    8. Robin M. Hogarth & Natalia Karelaia, 2005. "Simple Models for Multiattribute Choice with Many Alternatives: When It Does and Does Not Pay to Face Trade-offs with Binary Attributes," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(12), pages 1860-1872, December.
    9. Clintin Davis-Stober & Jason Dana & David Budescu, 2010. "A Constrained Linear Estimator for Multiple Regression," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 75(3), pages 521-541, September.
    10. Robin Hogarth & Natalia Karelaia, 2004. "Ignoring information in binary choice with continuous variables: When is less 'more'?," Economics Working Papers 742, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised Oct 2004.
    11. Goldstein, Daniel G. & Gigerenzer, Gerd, 2009. "Fast and frugal forecasting," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 760-772, October.
    12. Niels Waller & Jeff Jones, 2009. "Locating the Extrema of Fungible Regression Weights," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 74(4), pages 589-602, December.
    13. Robin M. Hogarth & Natalia Karelaia, 2006. "Regions of Rationality: Maps for Bounded Agents," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 3(3), pages 124-144, September.
    14. Niels Waller, 2008. "Fungible Weights in Multiple Regression," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 73(4), pages 691-703, December.
    15. Raymond Koopman, 1988. "On the sensitivity of a composite to its weights," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 53(4), pages 547-552, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Graefe, Andreas, 2015. "Improving forecasts using equally weighted predictors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(8), pages 1792-1799.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:76:y:2011:i:4:p:650-669. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla) or (Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.