IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/opmare/v18y2025i1d10.1007_s12063-024-00532-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Project portfolio selection and scheduling problem under material supply uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Farhad Habibi

    (University of New South Wales)

  • Ripon Kumar Chakrabortty

    (University of New South Wales)

  • Tom Servranckx

    (Ghent University)

  • Alireza Abbasi

    (University of New South Wales)

  • Mario Vanhoucke

    (Ghent University
    Operations and Technology Management Centre, Vlerick Business School
    UCL School of Management, University College London)

Abstract

Integrated decision-making across project portfolio selection, scheduling, and material ordering is essential to avoid suboptimal outcomes, including delays, cost overruns, and missed opportunities. However, existing literature overlooks this integration, as well as the significant impact of uncertainty in material supply on decision-making processes. To address these gaps, we propose a robust methodology for integrating these aspects while accounting for uncertainties in material supply. Initially, we present a deterministic optimization model that integrates key decisions of project portfolio selection, project scheduling, and material ordering to maximize the net present value (NPV). We then enhanced this approach by incorporating various sources of uncertainty in material supply, resulting in a robust model. Given the NP-hard nature of the problem, a modified genetic algorithm was employed to solve it efficiently for larger sizes. Results demonstrate that the modified genetic algorithm enhances computational efficiency while maintaining solution quality compared to exact methods. Specifically, it reduces solution time by over 90% for medium-scale problems with an optimality gap of 1%. Implemented on a road construction project in Australia, sensitivity analysis highlights the pivotal role of supplier capacity in project profitability. A potential 20% increase in capacity correlates with a notable 32% increase in NPV, underlining the importance of considering uncertainty in this parameter. Findings demonstrate that the proposed robust approach ensures feasibility and high-quality solutions across various scenarios, offering decision-makers confidence in unpredictable conditions. This study provides a practical roadmap for integrating decision-making processes and managing uncertainty in project management, enhancing adaptability in dynamic environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Farhad Habibi & Ripon Kumar Chakrabortty & Tom Servranckx & Alireza Abbasi & Mario Vanhoucke, 2025. "Project portfolio selection and scheduling problem under material supply uncertainty," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 226-256, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:opmare:v:18:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s12063-024-00532-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s12063-024-00532-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12063-024-00532-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12063-024-00532-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sha, Yue & Zhang, Junlong & Cao, Hui, 2021. "Multistage stochastic programming approach for joint optimization of job scheduling and material ordering under endogenous uncertainties," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(3), pages 886-900.
    2. Syed Abdul Rehman Khan & Muhammad Waqas & Xue Honggang & Naveed Ahmad & Zhang Yu, 2022. "Adoption of innovative strategies to mitigate supply chain disruption: COVID-19 pandemic," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 1115-1133, December.
    3. Dimitris Bertsimas & Melvyn Sim, 2004. "The Price of Robustness," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 35-53, February.
    4. Bajomo, Mary & Ogbeyemi, Akinola & Zhang, Wenjun, 2022. "A systems dynamics approach to the management of material procurement for Engineering, Procurement and Construction industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    5. Rumokoy, Lawren J. & Omura, Akihiro & Roca, Eduardo, 2023. "Geopolitical risk and corporate investment in the metals and mining industry: Evidence from Australia," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    6. Yan Zhang & Nanfang Cui & Xuejun Hu & Zhentao Hu, 2020. "Robust project scheduling integrated with materials ordering under activity duration uncertainty," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(10), pages 1581-1592, October.
    7. Seyed Hossein Razavi Hajiagha & Hannan Amoozad Mahdiraji & Maryam Behnam & Boshra Nekoughadirli & Rohit Joshi, 2022. "A scenario-based robust time–cost tradeoff model to handle the effect of COVID-19 on supply chains project management," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 357-377, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jianwen Ren & Yingqiang Xu & Shiyuan Wang, 2018. "A Distributed Robust Dispatch Approach for Interconnected Systems with a High Proportion of Wind Power Penetration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Li, Xingchen & Xu, Guangcheng & Wu, Jie & Xu, Chengzhen & Zhu, Qingyuan, 2024. "Evaluation of bank efficiency by considering the uncertainty of nonperforming loans," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    3. Wenqing Chen & Melvyn Sim & Jie Sun & Chung-Piaw Teo, 2010. "From CVaR to Uncertainty Set: Implications in Joint Chance-Constrained Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(2), pages 470-485, April.
    4. Zhi Chen & Melvyn Sim & Huan Xu, 2019. "Distributionally Robust Optimization with Infinitely Constrained Ambiguity Sets," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 1328-1344, September.
    5. Stefan Mišković, 2017. "A VNS-LP algorithm for the robust dynamic maximal covering location problem," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 39(4), pages 1011-1033, October.
    6. Sarhadi, Hassan & Naoum-Sawaya, Joe & Verma, Manish, 2020. "A robust optimization approach to locating and stockpiling marine oil-spill response facilities," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    7. Li, Shukai & Liu, Ronghui & Yang, Lixing & Gao, Ziyou, 2019. "Robust dynamic bus controls considering delay disturbances and passenger demand uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 88-109.
    8. Jeong, Jaehee & Premsankar, Gopika & Ghaddar, Bissan & Tarkoma, Sasu, 2024. "A robust optimization approach for placement of applications in edge computing considering latency uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    9. Chassein, André & Dokka, Trivikram & Goerigk, Marc, 2019. "Algorithms and uncertainty sets for data-driven robust shortest path problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(2), pages 671-686.
    10. Akhtar Hussain & Van-Hai Bui & Hak-Man Kim, 2016. "Robust Optimization-Based Scheduling of Multi-Microgrids Considering Uncertainties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-21, April.
    11. M. J. Naderi & M. S. Pishvaee, 2017. "Robust bi-objective macroscopic municipal water supply network redesign and rehabilitation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(9), pages 2689-2711, July.
    12. Kandpal, Bakul & Pareek, Parikshit & Verma, Ashu, 2022. "A robust day-ahead scheduling strategy for EV charging stations in unbalanced distribution grid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    13. Jun-ya Gotoh & Michael Jong Kim & Andrew E. B. Lim, 2020. "Worst-case sensitivity," Papers 2010.10794, arXiv.org.
    14. Guo, Shiliang & Li, Pengpeng & Ma, Kai & Yang, Bo & Yang, Jie, 2022. "Robust energy management for industrial microgrid considering charging and discharging pressure of electric vehicles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).
    15. Zhang, Hanxiao & Li, Yan-Fu, 2022. "Robust optimization on redundancy allocation problems in multi-state and continuous-state series–parallel systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    16. Evers, L. & Dollevoet, T.A.B. & Barros, A.I. & Monsuur, H., 2011. "Robust UAV Mission Planning," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2011-07, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    17. Shen, Feifei & Zhao, Liang & Wang, Meihong & Du, Wenli & Qian, Feng, 2022. "Data-driven adaptive robust optimization for energy systems in ethylene plant under demand uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    18. Baringo, Luis & Boffino, Luigi & Oggioni, Giorgia, 2020. "Robust expansion planning of a distribution system with electric vehicles, storage and renewable units," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    19. Mohammad Reza Ghatreh Samani & Seyyed-Mahdi Hosseini-Motlagh, 2021. "A robust framework for designing blood network in disaster relief: a real-life case," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 1529-1568, September.
    20. Barzanjeh, Shakoor & Ahmadizar, Fardin & Arkat, Jamal, 2025. "Logic-based benders decomposition algorithm for robust parallel drone scheduling problem considering uncertain travel times for drones," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:opmare:v:18:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s12063-024-00532-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.