IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v121y2025i5d10.1007_s11069-024-07024-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empirical evaluation of windstorm losses and meteorological variables over the Netherlands

Author

Listed:
  • M. d. S. Fonseca Cerda

    (VU Amsterdam)

  • H. Moel

    (VU Amsterdam)

  • D. Ederen

    (VU Amsterdam
    Achmea)

  • J. C. J. H. Aerts

    (VU Amsterdam
    Deltares)

  • W. J. W. Botzen

    (VU Amsterdam)

  • T. Haer

    (VU Amsterdam)

Abstract

This study investigates windstorm impacts by combining high-resolution wind hazard data with a unique asset-level insurance loss dataset, specifically focusing on the Netherlands. We conduct statistical analyses to associate wind hazard characteristics with spatial data on windstorm losses at various spatial aggregation levels (four-digit to nationwide postal codes). Different wind hazard intensities (e.g. maximum wind gust, maximum hourly wind speed) are derived using meteorological data from 2017 to 2021 (the same period as the loss data). This data is based on station and downscaled ERA5 reanalysis data. Results show that the recorded gust has a good correlation with damage components (r = 0.41–0.61). The downscaled reanalysis data on gust and daily maximum (hourly mean) wind speed also have a good correlation (r = 0.38–0.59), albeit a bit smaller than the observed gust. When comparing different levels of aggregated data (PC4—four-digit postal code, PC2—two-digit postal code, and NL—national level), the correlation between claim and loss ratios becomes more pronounced as the level of aggregation increases. In addition, at the aggregated data level of two-digit postal codes, we see a wind speed threshold (around the 98th percentile of the records, ~ 22 m/s), where both losses and reported claims begin to rise as wind speed increases. Nevertheless, with lower wind speeds, damages and reported claims become meaningful using more aggregated data (NL). Our findings highlight the complex link between hazard and damage variables for windstorm losses, offering valuable insights for insurance portfolios, risk assessment, and management.

Suggested Citation

  • M. d. S. Fonseca Cerda & H. Moel & D. Ederen & J. C. J. H. Aerts & W. J. W. Botzen & T. Haer, 2025. "Empirical evaluation of windstorm losses and meteorological variables over the Netherlands," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(5), pages 6085-6106, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s11069-024-07024-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-024-07024-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-024-07024-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-024-07024-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiaojun Shen & Chongcheng Zhou & Xuejiao Fu, 2018. "Study of Time and Meteorological Characteristics of Wind Speed Correlation in Flat Terrains Based on Operation Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, January.
    2. Carvalho, D. & Rocha, A. & Santos, C. Silva & Pereira, R., 2013. "Wind resource modelling in complex terrain using different mesoscale–microscale coupling techniques," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 493-504.
    3. Alexander S. Little & Matthew D. K. Priestley & Jennifer L. Catto, 2023. "Future increased risk from extratropical windstorms in northern Europe," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    4. E. E. Koks & J. Rozenberg & C. Zorn & M. Tariverdi & M. Vousdoukas & S. A. Fraser & J. W. Hall & S. Hallegatte, 2019. "A global multi-hazard risk analysis of road and railway infrastructure assets," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Hermann Held & Friedrich-Wilhelm Gerstengarbe & Tobias Pardowitz & Joaquim Pinto & Uwe Ulbrich & Kai Born & Markus Donat & Melanie Karremann & Gregor Leckebusch & Patrick Ludwig & Katrin Nissen & Herm, 2013. "Projections of global warming-induced impacts on winter storm losses in the German private household sector," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 121(2), pages 195-207, November.
    6. González-Aparicio, I. & Monforti, F. & Volker, P. & Zucker, A. & Careri, F. & Huld, T. & Badger, J., 2017. "Simulating European wind power generation applying statistical downscaling to reanalysis data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 155-168.
    7. Botzen, W.J.W. & Bouwer, L.M. & van den Bergh, J.C.J.M., 2010. "Climate change and hailstorm damage: Empirical evidence and implications for agriculture and insurance," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 341-362, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthew Ranson & Lisa Tarquinio & Audrey Lew, 2016. "Modeling the Impact of Climate Change on Extreme Weather Losses," NCEE Working Paper Series 201602, National Center for Environmental Economics, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, revised May 2016.
    2. Allen, D.J. & Tomlin, A.S. & Bale, C.S.E. & Skea, A. & Vosper, S. & Gallani, M.L., 2017. "A boundary layer scaling technique for estimating near-surface wind energy using numerical weather prediction and wind map data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 1246-1257.
    3. Radünz, William Corrêa & Mattuella, Jussara M. Leite & Petry, Adriane Prisco, 2020. "Wind resource mapping and energy estimation in complex terrain: A framework based on field observations and computational fluid dynamics," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 494-515.
    4. Xiao, Qing & Zhou, Shaowu, 2018. "Probabilistic power flow computation considering correlated wind speeds," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 677-685.
    5. Alain Ulazia & Ander Nafarrate & Gabriel Ibarra-Berastegi & Jon Sáenz & Sheila Carreno-Madinabeitia, 2019. "The Consequences of Air Density Variations over Northeastern Scotland for Offshore Wind Energy Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-18, July.
    6. Chandel, S.S. & Ramasamy, P. & Murthy, K.S.R, 2014. "Wind power potential assessment of 12 locations in western Himalayan region of India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 530-545.
    7. Liu, Huan & Tatano, Hirokazu & Pflug, Georg & Hochrainer-Stigler, Stefan, 2021. "Post-disaster recovery in industrial sectors: A Markov process analysis of multiple lifeline disruptions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    8. Fabian Barthel & Eric Neumayer, 2012. "A trend analysis of normalized insured damage from natural disasters," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 113(2), pages 215-237, July.
    9. Carvalho, D. & Rocha, A. & Gómez-Gesteira, M. & Silva Santos, C., 2017. "Offshore winds and wind energy production estimates derived from ASCAT, OSCAT, numerical weather prediction models and buoys – A comparative study for the Iberian Peninsula Atlantic coast," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(PB), pages 433-444.
    10. Matti Koivisto & Kaushik Das & Feng Guo & Poul Sørensen & Edgar Nuño & Nicolaos Cutululis & Petr Maule, 2019. "Using time series simulation tools for assessing the effects of variable renewable energy generation on power and energy systems," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(3), May.
    11. Mühlhofer, Evelyn & Koks, Elco E. & Kropf, Chahan M. & Sansavini, Giovanni & Bresch, David N., 2023. "A generalized natural hazard risk modelling framework for infrastructure failure cascades," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    12. Carvalho, D. & Rocha, A. & Gómez-Gesteira, M. & Silva Santos, C., 2014. "Sensitivity of the WRF model wind simulation and wind energy production estimates to planetary boundary layer parameterizations for onshore and offshore areas in the Iberian Peninsula," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 234-246.
    13. Ulazia, Alain & Saenz, Jon & Ibarra-Berastegui, Gabriel, 2016. "Sensitivity to the use of 3DVAR data assimilation in a mesoscale model for estimating offshore wind energy potential. A case study of the Iberian northern coastline," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 617-627.
    14. Amanda O’Shaughnessy & Asli Y. Dayioglu & Allen P. Davis & Ahmet H. Aydilek, 2024. "When roads want to be dams: looking to dam safety to regulate transportation embankments," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(3), pages 2349-2378, February.
    15. Rabbani, R. & Zeeshan, M., 2020. "Exploring the suitability of MERRA-2 reanalysis data for wind energy estimation, analysis of wind characteristics and energy potential assessment for selected sites in Pakistan," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 1240-1251.
    16. Reinhold Lehneis & Daniela Thrän, 2023. "Temporally and Spatially Resolved Simulation of the Wind Power Generation in Germany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-16, April.
    17. Manfred Lenzen & Mengyu Li & Arunima Malik & Francesco Pomponi & Ya-Yen Sun & Thomas Wiedmann & Futu Faturay & Jacob Fry & Blanca Gallego & Arne Geschke & Jorge Gómez-Paredes & Keiichiro Kanemoto & St, 2020. "Global socio-economic losses and environmental gains from the Coronavirus pandemic," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-13, July.
    18. Seljom, Pernille & Kvalbein, Lisa & Hellemo, Lars & Kaut, Michal & Ortiz, Miguel Muñoz, 2021. "Stochastic modelling of variable renewables in long-term energy models: Dataset, scenario generation & quality of results," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    19. González-Alonso de Linaje, N. & Mattar, C. & Borvarán, D., 2019. "Quantifying the wind energy potential differences using different WRF initial conditions on Mediterranean coast of Chile," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    20. Li, Tao & Rong, Lili & Zhang, Anming, 2021. "Assessing regional risk of COVID-19 infection from Wuhan via high-speed rail," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 226-238.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s11069-024-07024-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.