IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/minsoc/v20y2021i1d10.1007_s11299-020-00262-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The epistemic uncertainty of COVID-19: failures and successes of heuristics in clinical decision-making

Author

Listed:
  • Riccardo Viale

    (University of Milano-Bicocca)

Abstract

The brief article deals with the following questions: Was the adaptive toolbox of heuristics ecologically rational and specifically accurate in the initial stages of COVID-19, which was characterized by epistemic uncertainty? In other words, in dealing with COVID-19 did the environmental structural variables allow the success of a given heuristic strategy?

Suggested Citation

  • Riccardo Viale, 2021. "The epistemic uncertainty of COVID-19: failures and successes of heuristics in clinical decision-making," Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 20(1), pages 149-154, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:minsoc:v:20:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s11299-020-00262-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s11299-020-00262-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11299-020-00262-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11299-020-00262-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Goldstein, Daniel G. & Gigerenzer, Gerd, 2009. "Fast and frugal forecasting," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 760-772, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wüstenhagen, Rolf & Menichetti, Emanuela, 2012. "Strategic choices for renewable energy investment: Conceptual framework and opportunities for further research," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 1-10.
    2. Berg, Nathan & Biele, Guido & Gigerenzer, Gerd, 2010. "Does consistency predict accuracy of beliefs?: Economists surveyed about PSA," MPRA Paper 26590, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Woike, Jan K. & Hoffrage, Ulrich & Petty, Jeffrey S., 2015. "Picking profitable investments: The success of equal weighting in simulated venture capitalist decision making," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(8), pages 1705-1716.
    4. repec:cup:judgdm:v:6:y:2011:i:5:p:392-395 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Nigel Barradale & Thomas Plenborg & Simone Staehr, 2022. "Investor feedback: impact on analyst biases and investor critical evaluation," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(1), pages 767-803, March.
    6. Brent Moritz & Enno Siemsen & Mirko Kremer, 2014. "Judgmental Forecasting: Cognitive Reflection and Decision Speed," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 23(7), pages 1146-1160, July.
    7. Kathleen M. Eisenhardt & Christopher B. Bingham, 2017. "Superior Strategy in Entrepreneurial Settings: Thinking, Doing, and the Logic of Opportunity," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(4), pages 246-257, December.
    8. Armstrong, J. Scott, 2011. "Illusions in Regression Analysis," MPRA Paper 81663, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Signe Waechter & Bernadette Sütterlin & Michael Siegrist, 2017. "Decision-Making Strategies for the Choice of Energy-friendly Products," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 81-103, March.
    10. Sonntag, Dominik, 2018. "Die Theorie der fairen geometrischen Rendite [The Theory of Fair Geometric Returns]," MPRA Paper 87082, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Ghezzi, Antonio, 2020. "How Entrepreneurs make sense of Lean Startup Approaches: Business Models as cognitive lenses to generate fast and frugal Heuristics," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    12. Katsikopoulos, Konstantinos V. & Şimşek, Özgür & Buckmann, Marcus & Gigerenzer, Gerd, 2022. "Transparent modeling of influenza incidence: Big data or a single data point from psychological theory?," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 613-619.
    13. Kott, Alexander & Perconti, Philip, 2018. "Long-term forecasts of military technologies for a 20–30 year horizon: An empirical assessment of accuracy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 272-279.
    14. Alessandro Innocenti & Tommaso Nannicini & Roberto Ricciuti, 2021. "The Importance of Betting Early," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-15, April.
    15. Brighton, Henry & Gigerenzer, Gerd, 2015. "The bias bias," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(8), pages 1772-1784.
    16. Daniel G. Goldstein & Gerd Gigerenzer, 2011. "The beauty of simple models: Themes in recognition heuristic research," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 6(5), pages 392-395, July.
    17. Kati Stormi & Anni Lindholm & Teemu Laine & Tuomas Korhonen, 2020. "RFM customer analysis for product-oriented services and service business development: an interventionist case study of two machinery manufacturers," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 24(3), pages 623-653, September.
    18. Shi, Ruixia & Chen, Hongyu & Sethi, Suresh P., 2019. "A generalized count model on customers' purchases in O2O market," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 121-130.
    19. Katsikopoulos, Konstantinos V., 2016. "On the role of psychological heuristics in operational research; and a demonstration in military stability operationsAuthor-Name: Keller, Niklas," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(3), pages 1063-1073.
    20. Beatriz Cuadrado‐Ballesteros & Jennifer Martínez‐Ferrero & Isabel M. García‐Sánchez, 2017. "Board Structure to Enhance Social Responsibility Development: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of US Companies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(6), pages 524-542, November.
    21. Huang, Chun-Yao, 2012. "To model, or not to model: Forecasting for customer prioritization," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 497-506.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:minsoc:v:20:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s11299-020-00262-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.