IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/josatr/v10y2025i1d10.1186_s41072-025-00193-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the impact on mode competitiveness of improvements of the Trans-Eurasian railway network

Author

Listed:
  • Seyed Mohseni

    (University of Antwerp)

  • Edwin Hassel

    (University of Antwerp)

  • Thierry Vanelslander

    (University of Antwerp)

Abstract

This paper deals with the potential of the different modes of transport on the Eurasian connection, focusing on rail, and comparing with sea and air. Since 2008, a substantial uptake of the rail connection has been observed. The main question then is whether the competitiveness of this land bridge is actual and sustainable or not. First, the paper focuses on the latest developments of the actual physical capacity on the Eurasian connection. Mainly under Chinese impetus, substantial improvements of rail connections but also border crossings have been made. Second, the paper focuses on the actual competitiveness of the different modes on the Eurasian connection in the current-day transport volumes. It can be observed that also the transport on the Eurasian connection has been growing, especially by rail. However, by far the largest volumes of transport still happen by maritime transport. The third and main question of the paper is on whether the land bridge by rail would cost-wise be competitive enough to favour a large shift from sea to land. An adapted version of a chain cost model applied to seven city pairs shows that the cost of the maritime solution is notably higher the further away from the coast origin and/or destination are located. For rail, such significant cost differences are not found. Furthermore, the value of the goods plays a bigger role for rail than for maritime transport. Air transport, due to its higher charges, typically is only used by higher-value goods. When comparing the (combinations of) transport modes, it turns out that the rail costs are on average 1.5 times to twice as high as when using maritime transport, but the more westward the origin on the Chinese territory, the closer the ratio gets to 1. The sensitivity analysis shows that in particular using longer trains will allow strongly further reducing generalized rail chain costs, easily over a third of the base case costs. Substantially less generalized chain cost reductions are achieved when shortening transit times, even when the latter goes up to half the initial transit time. Fourth, looking at what would be needed to make a further shift to rail materialize on the Eurasian connection, three items pop up: rail border crossing capacity, traffic balance between both directions and backups to the TEN-T rail network.

Suggested Citation

  • Seyed Mohseni & Edwin Hassel & Thierry Vanelslander, 2025. "Assessing the impact on mode competitiveness of improvements of the Trans-Eurasian railway network," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-30, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:josatr:v:10:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1186_s41072-025-00193-4
    DOI: 10.1186/s41072-025-00193-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s41072-025-00193-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s41072-025-00193-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Welch, Timothy F. & Mishra, Sabyasachee, 2013. "A measure of equity for public transit connectivity," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 29-41.
    2. Bird, Julia & Lebrand, Mathilde & Venables, Anthony J., 2020. "The Belt and Road Initiative: Reshaping economic geography in Central Asia?," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    3. Zhenhua Chen & Xinmeng Li, 2021. "Economic impact of transportation infrastructure investment under the Belt and Road Initiative," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 131-159, December.
    4. van Hassel, Edwin & Vanelslander, Thierry & Neyens, Kris & Vandeborre, Hans & Kindt, Dominique & Kellens, Stefan, 2022. "Reconsidering nearshoring to avoid global crisis impacts: Application and calculation of the total cost of ownership for specific scenarios," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    5. Ma, Shengnan, 2022. "Growth effects of economic integration: New evidence from the Belt and Road Initiative," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 753-767.
    6. Bert Van Wee & Sabine Roeser, 2013. "Ethical Theories and the Cost--Benefit Analysis-Based Ex Ante Evaluation of Transport Policies and Plans," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(6), pages 743-760, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tingsong Wang & Jingyi Xu & Yong Jin & Shuaian Wang, 2024. "Assessing the Belt and Road Initiative’s Impact: A Multi-Regression Model Based on Economic Interaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-26, May.
    2. Linda Calabrese & Rhys Jenkins & Lorena Lombardozzi, 2024. "The Belt and Road Initiative and Dynamics of Structural Transformation," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 36(3), pages 515-547, June.
    3. Jafino, Bramka Arga, 2021. "An equity-based transport network criticality analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 204-221.
    4. Bo Qin & Dongmei Zeng & Angang Gao, 2022. "Convergence effect of the Belt and Road Initiative on income disparity: evidence from China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Wang, Hui & Si, Ieongcheng & Chen, Zhihua, 2024. "Does the Belt and Road Initiative promote China and the countries along the route to reconstruct the global value chain? Evidence from value-added trade," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 63-83.
    6. repec:osf:socarx:ua2gj_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. de Soyres, François & Mulabdic, Alen & Ruta, Michele, 2020. "Common transport infrastructure: A quantitative model and estimates from the Belt and Road Initiative," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    8. Kaplan, Sigal & Popoks, Dmitrijs & Prato, Carlo Giacomo & Ceder, Avishai (Avi), 2014. "Using connectivity for measuring equity in transit provision," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 82-92.
    9. Stewart, Anson F. & Zegras, P. Christopher, 2016. "CoAXs: A Collaborative Accessibility-based Stakeholder Engagement System for communicating transport impacts," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 423-433.
    10. ESCAP secretariat, 2023. "Accelerating Climate Action In Asia And The Pacific For Sustainable Development," Asia-Pacific Sustainable Development Journal, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), vol. 30(1), pages 1-17, May.
    11. Song, Yena & Kim, Hyun & Lee, Keumsook & Ahn, Kwangwon, 2018. "Subway network expansion and transit equity: A case study of Gwangju metropolitan area, South Korea," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 148-158.
    12. de Soyres, François & Mulabdic, Alen & Murray, Siobhan & Rocha, Nadia & Ruta, Michele, 2019. "How much will the Belt and Road Initiative reduce trade costs?," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 151-164.
    13. Ferrari, Emanuele & Christidis, Panayotis, 2022. "Modelling the impacts of a surge in shipping costs," Conference papers 333463, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    14. Jinxia Zhu & Qian Xu & Yi Pan & Lefeng Qiu & Yi Peng & Haijun Bao, 2018. "Land-Acquisition and Resettlement (LAR) Conflicts: A Perspective of Spatial Injustice of Urban Public Resources Allocation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, March.
    15. Bluhm, Richard & Dreher, Axel & Fuchs, Andreas & Parks, Bradley C. & Strange, Austin M. & Tierney, Michael J., 2025. "Connective financing: Chinese infrastructure projects and the diffusion of economic activity in developing countries," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    16. Pietro Lanzini & Andrea Stocchetti, 2017. "The evolution of the conceptual basis for the assessment of urban mobility sustainability impacts," Working Papers 02, Venice School of Management - Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    17. Lebrand,Mathilde Sylvie Maria, 2021. "Corridors without Borders in West Africa," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9855, The World Bank.
    18. Adam Rose & Zhenhua Chen & Dan Wei, 2023. "The economic impacts of Russia–Ukraine War export disruptions of grain commodities," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(2), pages 645-665, June.
    19. Bittencourt, Tainá A. & Giannotti, Mariana, 2023. "Evaluating the accessibility and availability of public services to reduce inequalities in everyday mobility," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    20. Keo, Borin & Li, Bin & Younis, Waqas, 2025. "Measuring trade costs and analyzing the determinants of trade growth between Cambodia and major trading partners: 1993–2019," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 20(1), pages 1-33.
    21. Helen LaVan & Lori S. Cook & Ivana Zilic, 2021. "An analysis of the ethical frameworks and financial outcomes of corporate social responsibility and business press reporting of US pharmaceutical companies," International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(3), pages 326-355.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:josatr:v:10:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1186_s41072-025-00193-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.