IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jcsosc/v8y2025i2d10.1007_s42001-024-00353-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling policy action using natural language processing: evidence for a long-run increase in policy activism in the UK

Author

Listed:
  • Mircea Popa

    (University of Bristol)

Abstract

Analyzing policymaking using archival evidence is common in qualitative studies, but doing so using text-as-data methods is challenging because commonly used techniques favor the identification of policy areas rather than actions. This article employs natural language processing to evaluate how UK governments describe their actions, using the full sample of official (command) papers they produced between 1974 and 2023. The methodology relies on identifying sentence structure rather than a bag-of-words approach, and on explicitly modelling statements related to policy in terms of subjects, predicates, and objects. The analysis identifies a long-run increase in language referring to active intervention, and a decline in deliberative, analytical, and descriptive language, that began as early as the 1980s. Moreover, the objects of this activist language have shifted from systemic to more personalized over time. The implications of these findings for our understanding of policy developments in the post-1980 era are discussed in the conclusion.

Suggested Citation

  • Mircea Popa, 2025. "Modelling policy action using natural language processing: evidence for a long-run increase in policy activism in the UK," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 1-51, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jcsosc:v:8:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s42001-024-00353-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s42001-024-00353-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s42001-024-00353-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s42001-024-00353-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jcsosc:v:8:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s42001-024-00353-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.