IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jnlpup/v39y2019i02p267-294_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Change or stability in the structure of interest group networks? Evidence from Scottish Public Policy Consultations

Author

Listed:
  • Ackland, Robert
  • Halpin, Darren R.

Abstract

Scholars have hotly debated the structure of group engagement in policymaking. Two aspects of this conversation are examined here. First, some claim that the “explosion†of organised interests brings with it increasing fragmentation but also policy “balkanisation†. Others suggest increasing fragmentation, but with overlap between subsectors. A second area of this debate concerns the existence and number of “central†or “core†groups. Although existing studies show that, in aggregate, there is no more policy specialisation among United Kingdom organised interests, we do not know whether this means that there are fewer or more central groups. In this article, we utilise public policy consultations in Scotland over a continuous 25-year period, and the tools of network analysis, to examine the above propositions. We find that the expanding system of policy consultation is not associated with more balkanisation or with a decline of central policy actors that span policy communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Ackland, Robert & Halpin, Darren R., 2019. "Change or stability in the structure of interest group networks? Evidence from Scottish Public Policy Consultations," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 39(2), pages 267-294, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:39:y:2019:i:02:p:267-294_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0143814X18000065/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:39:y:2019:i:02:p:267-294_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pup .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.