IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infsem/v19y2021i3d10.1007_s10257-020-00467-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Processes, benefits, and challenges for adoption of blockchain technologies in food supply chains: a thematic analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Si Chen

    (Nanjing University)

  • Xingchen Liu

    (Nanjing University)

  • Jiaqi Yan

    (Nanjing University)

  • Guangwei Hu

    (Nanjing University)

  • Yani Shi

    (Southeast University)

Abstract

Blockchain technologies have become increasingly popular and attracted great interest in recent years. Beyond the financial sector, blockchain technologies are promising for addressing the current limitations in food supply chain management. As blockchain adoption for food supply chains is still in an early stage, it is significant to have a thematic framework to systematically understand the processes, benefits, and challenges. This paper aims to explore the adoption of blockchain technologies in food supply chains with a thematic analysis. Desktop research is conducted, and data is collected from online databases, including news article (e.g. Factiva) and research paper databases (e.g. Web of Science). Then we carry out a qualitative thematic analysis, according to the investigation processes suggested by Creswell. Based on the thematic analysis, we identify seven first-order themes and two second-order themes in adoption processes; thirteen first-order themes, sixteen second-order themes, and five third-order themes in benefits; and fourteen first-order themes and five second-order themes in challenges. In addition, we discuss and propose how to improve blockchain adoption in food supply chains in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Si Chen & Xingchen Liu & Jiaqi Yan & Guangwei Hu & Yani Shi, 2021. "Processes, benefits, and challenges for adoption of blockchain technologies in food supply chains: a thematic analysis," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 909-935, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infsem:v:19:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s10257-020-00467-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10257-020-00467-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10257-020-00467-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10257-020-00467-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moser, Stephanie & Mosler, Hans-Joachim, 2008. "Differences in influence patterns between groups predicting the adoption of a solar disinfection technology for drinking water in Bolivia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(4), pages 497-504, August.
    2. Mojtaba Vaismoradi & Hannele Turunen & Terese Bondas, 2013. "Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 398-405, September.
    3. Chang, Shuchih Ernest & Chen, Yi-Chian & Lu, Ming-Fang, 2019. "Supply chain re-engineering using blockchain technology: A case of smart contract based tracking process," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1-11.
    4. Krzyzanowski, Kathleen, 2019. "Putting Food on the Blockchain: A Regulatory Overview," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 50(1), March.
    5. Brenig, Christian & Schwarz, Jonas & Ostern, Nadine, 2016. "Value of Decentralized consensus Systems - Evaluation Framework," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 92780, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    6. Witold Nowiński & Miklós Kozma, 2017. "How Can Blockchain Technology Disrupt the Existing Business Models?," Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, Centre for Strategic and International Entrepreneurship at the Cracow University of Economics., vol. 5(3), pages 173-188.
    7. Frank Yiannas, 2018. "A New Era of Food Transparency Powered by Blockchain," Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, MIT Press, vol. 12(1-2), pages 46-56, Summer-Fa.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shashidharan. M & Yogesh Mahajan & Shameem Anwar, 2022. "Enhancement of Supply Chain Management through Educating Key Processes with the Hub and Spoke Model Based on Multi-Adaptive Spider Monkey Optimization Algorithm," World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 12(3), pages 263-263, April.
    2. Ulpan Tokkozhina & Ana Lucia Martins & Joao C. Ferreira, 2023. "Uncovering dimensions of the impact of blockchain technology in supply chain management," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 99-125, March.
    3. Park, Hyejune & Lim, Rachel Esther, 2023. "Fashion and the metaverse: Clarifying the domain and establishing a research agenda," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francesco Mercuri & Gaetano della Corte & Federica Ricci, 2021. "Blockchain Technology and Sustainable Business Models: A Case Study of Devoleum," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-14, May.
    2. Archana A Mukherjee & Rajesh Kumar Singh & Ruchi Mishra & Surajit Bag, 2022. "Application of blockchain technology for sustainability development in agricultural supply chain: justification framework," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 46-61, June.
    3. Hana Trollman & Guillermo Garcia-Garcia & Sandeep Jagtap & Frank Trollman, 2022. "Blockchain for Ecologically Embedded Coffee Supply Chains," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-17, June.
    4. Zheng, Leven J. & Xiong, Chang & Chen, Xihui & Li, Chung-Sheng, 2021. "Product innovation in entrepreneurial firms: How business model design influences disruptive and adoptive innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    5. Bartsch, Devis & Winkler, Herwig, 2020. "Blockchain technology in Germany: An excerpt of real use cases in logistics industry," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Data Science and Innovation in Supply Chain Management: How Data Transforms the Value Chain. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Lo, volume 29, pages 699-735, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    6. Vincenzo Varriale & Antonello Cammarano & Francesca Michelino & Mauro Caputo, 2021. "Sustainable Supply Chains with Blockchain, IoT and RFID: A Simulation on Order Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, June.
    7. Sapanna Laysiriroj & Walter Wehrmeyer, 2020. "Intergenerational differences of CSR activities in family-run businesses in eastern Thailand," Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Maider Belintxon & Nisha Dogra & Paula McGee & Maria Jesus Pumar‐Mendez & Olga Lopez‐Dicastillo, 2020. "Encounters between children's nurses and culturally diverse parents in primary health care," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(2), pages 273-282, June.
    9. Su, Dan & Zhang, Lijun & Peng, Hua & Saeidi, Parvaneh & Tirkolaee, Erfan Babaee, 2023. "Technical challenges of blockchain technology for sustainable manufacturing paradigm in Industry 4.0 era using a fuzzy decision support system," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    10. Emmanuel Songsore & Michael Buzzelli, 2016. "Ontario’s Experience of Wind Energy Development as Seen through the Lens of Human Health and Environmental Justice," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, July.
    11. Ana Cristina Lindsay & Sherrie F. Wallington & Faith D. Lees & Mary L. Greaney, 2018. "Exploring How the Home Environment Influences Eating and Physical Activity Habits of Low-Income, Latino Children of Predominantly Immigrant Families: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-13, May.
    12. David P. Ashmore & Roselle Thoreau & Corina Kwami & Nicola Christie & Nicholas A. Tyler, 2020. "Using thematic analysis to explore symbolism in transport choice across national cultures," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 607-640, April.
    13. Liu Jiaguo & Zhang Huimin & Zhao Huida, 2021. "Blockchain Technology Investment and Sharing Strategy of Port Supply Chain Under Competitive Environment," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 9(3), pages 280-309, June.
    14. Satu Elo & Maria Kääriäinen & Outi Kanste & Tarja Pölkki & Kati Utriainen & Helvi Kyngäs, 2014. "Qualitative Content Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(1), pages 21582440145, February.
    15. Borch, Kristian & Munk, Anders K. & Dahlgaard, Vibeke, 2020. "Mapping wind-power controversies on social media: Facebook as a powerful mobilizer of local resistance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    16. Naci Akdemir & Serkan Yenal, 2021. "How Phishers Exploit the Coronavirus Pandemic: A Content Analysis of COVID-19 Themed Phishing Emails," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    17. Caro Wolfner & Corilyn Ott & Kalani Upshaw & Angela Stowe & Lisa Schwiebert & Robin Gaines Lanzi, 2023. "Coping Strategies and Help-Seeking Behaviors of College Students and Postdoctoral Fellows with Disabilities or Pre-Existing Conditions during COVID-19," Disabilities, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-25, February.
    18. Panagiota Xanthopoulou, 2022. "Blockchain and the digital transformation of the public sector: The Greek experience," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 32(1), pages 558-570, June.
    19. Christopher Mulwanda & Vincent R. Nyirenda & Ngawo Namukonde, 2024. "Traditional ecological knowledge, perceptions and practices on insect pollinator conservation: A case of the smallholder farmers in Murundu ward of Mufulira mining district of Zambia," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 14(1), pages 24-35, March.
    20. Chiara Oppi & Cristina Campanale & Lino Cinquini, 2021. "Il problema dell?ambiguit? nei sistemi di misurazione della performance nel settore pubblico: un?analisi della letteratura internazionale," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2021(2), pages 11-38.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infsem:v:19:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s10257-020-00467-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.