IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infosf/v26y2024i2d10.1007_s10796-023-10386-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Mining Town in a Digital Land: Browser-Based Cryptocurrency Mining as an Alternative to Online Advertising

Author

Listed:
  • Alper Yayla

    (University of Tampa)

  • Ersin Dincelli

    (University of Colorado Denver)

  • Srikanth Parameswaran

    (Binghamton University)

Abstract

Advertising has been the most common strategy for content monetization. However, behavioral data collection for personalized advertisements has raised privacy concerns. This study explores users’ perceptions of browser-based cryptocurrency mining (BCM) as an alternative content monetization method to online advertising. The mining process is an essential part of blockchain technology, but it is a resource-intensive process. By utilizing BCM, content providers can mine cryptocurrency on the computers of website visitors and provide free or discounted services for the cost of the mining process. Considering that BCM revenue can be comparable to online advertisement while preserving user privacy at a negligible cost, we explored underlying factors affecting the adoption of BCM. We conducted a qualitative exploratory study using linguistic analysis and topic modeling of data collected from an online focus group. The results revealed that users raised security concerns and resisted BCM adoption due to its negative image and potential risk barriers. Our results further showed that online advertising benefits from the status quo bias. That is, although users raised both privacy and security concerns, they still considered online advertising. We extend the literature by analyzing controversial technology in the light of incumbent technology and provide directions for implementing BCM as a successful revenue stream.

Suggested Citation

  • Alper Yayla & Ersin Dincelli & Srikanth Parameswaran, 2024. "A Mining Town in a Digital Land: Browser-Based Cryptocurrency Mining as an Alternative to Online Advertising," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 609-631, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:26:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10796-023-10386-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10796-023-10386-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10796-023-10386-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10796-023-10386-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mick, David Glen & Fournier, Susan, 1998. "Paradoxes of Technology: Consumer Cognizance, Emotions, and Coping Strategies," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 25(2), pages 123-143, September.
    2. Hardesty, David M. & Bearden, William O., 2004. "The use of expert judges in scale development: Implications for improving face validity of measures of unobservable constructs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 98-107, February.
    3. Yujia Zhai & Ying Ding & Hezhao Zhang, 2021. "Innovation adoption: Broadcasting versus virality," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(4), pages 403-416, April.
    4. Kleijnen, Mirella & Lee, Nick & Wetzels, Martin, 2009. "An exploration of consumer resistance to innovation and its antecedents," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 344-357, June.
    5. Park, Eunil, 2019. "Motivations for customer revisit behavior in online review comments: Analyzing the role of user experience using big data approaches," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 14-18.
    6. Samuelson, William & Zeckhauser, Richard, 1988. "Status Quo Bias in Decision Making," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 7-59, March.
    7. Ersin Dincelli & InduShobha Chengalur-Smith, 2020. "Choose your own training adventure: designing a gamified SETA artefact for improving information security and privacy through interactive storytelling," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(6), pages 669-687, November.
    8. Trupil Limbasiya & Sanjay Kumar Sahay & Bharath Sridharan, 2021. "Privacy-Preserving Mutual Authentication and Key Agreement Scheme for Multi-Server Healthcare System," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 835-848, August.
    9. Gioele Bigini & Valerio Freschi & Emanuele Lattanzi, 2020. "A Review on Blockchain for the Internet of Medical Things: Definitions, Challenges, Applications, and Vision," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, November.
    10. Warkentin, Merrill & Orgeron, Craig, 2020. "Using the security triad to assess blockchain technology in public sector applications," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    11. Panagiotis Adamopoulos & Anindya Ghose & Vilma Todri, 2018. "The Impact of User Personality Traits on Word of Mouth: Text-Mining Social Media Platforms," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 612-640, September.
    12. Michael Breward & Khaled Hassanein & Milena Head, 2017. "Understanding Consumers’ Attitudes Toward Controversial Information Technologies: A Contextualization Approach," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 760-774, December.
    13. Anol Bhattacherjee & Neset Hikmet, 2007. "Physicians' resistance toward healthcare information technology: a theoretical model and empirical test," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(6), pages 725-737, December.
    14. Gang Xue & Jia Xu & Hanwen Wu & Weifeng Lu & Lijie Xu, 2021. "Incentive Mechanism for Rational Miners in Bitcoin Mining Pool," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 317-327, April.
    15. Tamara Dinev & Paul Hart, 2006. "An Extended Privacy Calculus Model for E-Commerce Transactions," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 61-80, March.
    16. Malik, Ashish & Froese, Fabian Jintae & Sharma, Piyush, 2020. "Role of HRM in knowledge integration: Towards a conceptual framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 524-535.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hung-Pin Shih & Wuqiang Liu, 2023. "Beyond the trade-offs on Facebook: the underlying mechanisms of privacy choices," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 353-387, June.
    2. Hajiheydari, Nastaran & Delgosha, Mohammad Soltani & Olya, Hossein, 2021. "Scepticism and resistance to IoMT in healthcare: Application of behavioural reasoning theory with configurational perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    3. Michael Breward & Khaled Hassanein & Milena Head, 2017. "Understanding Consumers’ Attitudes Toward Controversial Information Technologies: A Contextualization Approach," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 760-774, December.
    4. Querci, Ilaria & Monsurrò, Luigi & Peverini, Paolo, 2024. "When anthropomorphism backfires: Anticipation of negative social roles as a source of resistance to smart object adoption," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    5. Donald R. Lehmann & Jeffrey R. Parker, 2017. "Disadoption," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 7(1), pages 36-51, June.
    6. Tianyi Li & Xiaoquan (Michael) Zhang, 2024. "Development Trajectory of Blockchain Platforms: The Role of Multirole," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 1296-1323, September.
    7. Hufnagel, Gerrit & Schwaiger, Manfred & Weritz, Louisa, 2022. "Seeking the perfect price: Consumer responses to personalized price discrimination in e-commerce," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 346-365.
    8. Mohamed Amr Sultan & Tomaž Kramberger & Mahmoud Barakat & Ahmed Hussein Ali, 2023. "Barriers to Applying Last-Mile Logistics in the Egyptian Market: An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-25, August.
    9. Jacques Nel & Christo Boshoff, 2023. "Unraveling the link between status quo satisfaction and the rejection of digital-only banks," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(1), pages 189-207, March.
    10. Huang, Dan & Jin, Xin & Coghlan, Alexandra, 2021. "Advances in consumer innovation resistance research: A review and research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    11. Geoff Tomaino & Jasper Teow & Ziv Carmon & Leonard Lee & Moshe Ben-Akiva & Charlene Chen & Wai Yan Leong & Shanjun Li & Nan Yang & Jinhua Zhao, 2020. "Mobility as a service (MaaS): the importance of transportation psychology," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 419-428, December.
    12. Malodia, Suresh & Kaur, Puneet & Ractham, Peter & Sakashita, Mototaka & Dhir, Amandeep, 2022. "Why do people avoid and postpone the use of voice assistants for transactional purposes? A perspective from decision avoidance theory," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 605-618.
    13. Janarthanan Balakrishnan & Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Laurie Hughes & Frederic Boy, 2024. "Enablers and Inhibitors of AI-Powered Voice Assistants: A Dual-Factor Approach by Integrating the Status Quo Bias and Technology Acceptance Model," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 921-942, June.
    14. Kapoor, Anuj Pal & Vij, Madhu, 2021. "Following you wherever you go: Mobile shopping ‘cart-checkout’ abandonment," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    15. Mutaz M. Al-Debei & Omar Hujran & Ahmad Samed Al-Adwan, 2024. "Net valence analysis of iris recognition technology-based FinTech," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 1-47, December.
    16. Zied Mani & Inès Chouk, 2018. "Consumer Resistance to Innovation in Services," Post-Print hal-03700875, HAL.
    17. Krisna Nugraha & Muhtosim Arief & Sri Bramantoro Abdinagoro & Pantri Heriyati, 2022. "Factors Influencing Bank Customers’ Orientations toward Islamic Banks: Indonesian Banking Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.
    18. Fu, Shihui & Xue, Kunkun & Yang, Mengya & Wang, Xiaona, 2023. "An exploratory study on users' resistance to mobile app updates: Using netnography and fsQCA," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    19. Margulis, Anna & Boeck, Harold & Laroche, Michel, 2020. "Connecting with consumers using ubiquitous technology: A new model to forecast consumer reaction," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 448-460.
    20. Giacalone, Davide & Jaeger, Sara R., 2016. "Better the devil you know? How product familiarity affects usage versatility of foods and beverages," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 120-138.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:26:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10796-023-10386-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.