IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infosf/v19y2017i3d10.1007_s10796-015-9616-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Business-to-business e-commerce adoption: An empirical investigation of business factors

Author

Listed:
  • Narasimhaiah Gorla

    (American University of Sharjah)

  • Ananth Chiravuri

    (UAE University)

  • Ravi Chinta

    (University at Montgomery)

Abstract

We develop an overarching model to explain the adoption of business-to-business e-commerce using five business factors: external environment, organizational context, decision-maker’s characteristics, technology context, and organizational learning. Data collected from IS executives was analyzed using logistic regression. Our model has a good fit with over 77 % variance explained. Findings indicate that the existence of informal interest groups, and the tolerant attitude of decision makers towards negative information about business-to-business e-commerce have significant influence on the adoption decision. In addition, our results indicate that price intensity and perceived barriers negatively affect the adoption decision.

Suggested Citation

  • Narasimhaiah Gorla & Ananth Chiravuri & Ravi Chinta, 2017. "Business-to-business e-commerce adoption: An empirical investigation of business factors," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 645-667, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:19:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s10796-015-9616-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s10796-015-9616-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10796-015-9616-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10796-015-9616-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tridas Mukhopadhyay & Sunder Kekre, 2002. "Strategic and Operational Benefits of Electronic Integration in B2B Procurement Processes," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(10), pages 1301-1313, October.
    2. Arvind Malhotra & Sanjay Gosain & Omar A. El Sawy, 2007. "Leveraging Standard Electronic Business Interfaces to Enable Adaptive Supply Chain Partnerships," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 260-279, September.
    3. Cynthia P. Ruppel & Geoffry S. Howard, 1998. "Facilitating Innovation Adoption and Diffusion: The Case of Telework," Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), IGI Global, vol. 11(3), pages 5-16, July.
    4. Viswanath Venkatesh & Hillol Bala, 2012. "Adoption and Impacts of Interorganizational Business Process Standards: Role of Partnering Synergy," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 1131-1157, December.
    5. Gunasekaran, Angappa & McGaughey, Ronald E. & Ngai, Eric W.T. & Rai, Bharatendra K., 2009. "E-Procurement adoption in the Southcoast SMEs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 161-175, November.
    6. Robert G. Fichman & Chris F. Kemerer, 1999. "The Illusory Diffusion of Innovation: An Examination of Assimilation Gaps," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 255-275, September.
    7. Ki H. Kang & Jina Kang, 2009. "How Do Firms Source External Knowledge For Innovation? Analysing Effects Of Different Knowledge Sourcing Methods," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 13(01), pages 1-17.
    8. Mohiuddin Ahmed & Ramlah Hussein & Rashidah Minakhatun & Rafikul Islam, 2007. "Building consumers' confidence in adopting e-commerce: a Malaysian case," International Journal of Business and Systems Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(2), pages 236-255.
    9. Paul Attewell, 1992. "Technology Diffusion and Organizational Learning: The Case of Business Computing," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(1), pages 1-19, February.
    10. Vijay Mahajan & Eitan Muller & Roger A. Kerin, 1984. "Introduction Strategy for New Products with Positive and Negative Word-of-Mouth," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(12), pages 1389-1404, December.
    11. E. Burton Swanson, 1994. "Information Systems Innovation Among Organizations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(9), pages 1069-1092, September.
    12. Robert G. Fichman, 2004. "Real Options and IT Platform Adoption: Implications for Theory and Practice," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 15(2), pages 132-154, June.
    13. Lee, Ya-Ching & Chu, Pin-Yu & Tseng, Hsien-Lee, 2009. "Exploring the relationships between information technology adoption and business process reengineering," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(2), pages 170-185, May.
    14. Leonard-Barton, Dorothy, 1985. "Experts as Negative Opinion Leaders in the Diffusion of a Technological Innovation," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 11(4), pages 914-926, March.
    15. Zhang, Cheng & Dhaliwal, Jasbir, 2009. "An investigation of resource-based and institutional theoretic factors in technology adoption for operations and supply chain management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 252-269, July.
    16. Hillol Bala & Viswanath Venkatesh, 2007. "Assimilation of Interorganizational Business Process Standards," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 340-362, September.
    17. Sandy Chong & Graham Pervan, 2007. "Factors Influencing the Extent of Deployment of Electronic Commerce for Small-and Medium Sized Enterprises," Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations (JECO), IGI Global, vol. 5(1), pages 1-29, January.
    18. Frambach, Ruud T. & Barkema, Harry G. & Nooteboom, Bart & Wedel, Michel, 1998. "Adoption of a service innovation in the business market: An empirical test of supply-side variables," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 161-174, February.
    19. Randolph B. Cooper & Robert W. Zmud, 1990. "Information Technology Implementation Research: A Technological Diffusion Approach," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 123-139, February.
    20. Ki H. Kang & Jina Kang, 2009. "How Do Firms Source External Knowledge for Innovation? Analyzing Effects of Different Knowledge Sourcing Methods," TEMEP Discussion Papers 200907, Seoul National University; Technology Management, Economics, and Policy Program (TEMEP), revised Aug 2009.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ya-na Wang & Lifu Jin & Hanping Mao, 2019. "Farmer Cooperatives’ Intention to Adopt Agricultural Information Technology—Mediating Effects of Attitude," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 565-580, June.
    2. Georgeta Soava & Anca Mehedintu & Mihaela Sterpu, 2022. "Analysis and Forecast of the Use of E-Commerce in Enterprises of the European Union States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-29, July.
    3. Anupriya Khan & Satish Krishnan & Jithesh Arayankalam, 2022. "The Role of ICT Laws and National Culture in Determining ICT Diffusion and Well-Being: A Cross-Country Examination," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 415-440, April.
    4. Emmanuel H. Yindi & Immaculate Maumoh & Prisillah L. Mahavile, 2021. "Exploring the role of Awareness, Government Policy, and Infrastructure in adapting B2C E-Commerce to East African Countries," Papers 2102.11729, arXiv.org.
    5. Adeoluwa Akande & Pedro Cabral & Sven Casteleyn, 2019. "Assessing the Gap between Technology and the Environmental Sustainability of European Cities," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 581-604, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Narasimhaiah Gorla & Ananth Chiravuri & Ravi Chinta, 0. "Business-to-business e-commerce adoption: An empirical investigation of business factors," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-23.
    2. Sanjith Gopalakrishnan & Moksh Matta & Hasan Cavusoglu, 2022. "The Dark Side of Technological Modularity: Opportunistic Information Hiding During Interorganizational System Adoption," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 1072-1092, September.
    3. Ghiyoung Im & Arun Rai, 2014. "IT-Enabled Coordination for Ambidextrous Interorganizational Relationships," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 72-92, March.
    4. Aboelmaged, Mohamed Gamal, 2014. "Predicting e-readiness at firm-level: An analysis of technological, organizational and environmental (TOE) effects on e-maintenance readiness in manufacturing firms," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 639-651.
    5. Arun Rai & Xinlin Tang, 2010. "Leveraging IT Capabilities and Competitive Process Capabilities for the Management of Interorganizational Relationship Portfolios," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 516-542, September.
    6. Zhang, Cheng & Dhaliwal, Jasbir, 2009. "An investigation of resource-based and institutional theoretic factors in technology adoption for operations and supply chain management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 252-269, July.
    7. Kevin Zhu & Kenneth L. Kraemer & Sean Xu, 2006. "The Process of Innovation Assimilation by Firms in Different Countries: A Technology Diffusion Perspective on E-Business," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(10), pages 1557-1576, October.
    8. Amit Saini & Rajdeep Grewal & Jean Johnson, 2010. "Putting market-facing technology to work: Organizational drivers of CRM performance," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 365-383, December.
    9. Robert G. Fichman, 2004. "Real Options and IT Platform Adoption: Implications for Theory and Practice," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 15(2), pages 132-154, June.
    10. Ashwin W. Joshi, 2017. "OEM implementation of supplier-developed component innovations: the role of supplier actions," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 548-568, July.
    11. Gediminas Adomavicius & Jesse Bockstedt & Alok Gupta, 2012. "Modeling Supply-Side Dynamics of IT Components, Products, and Infrastructure: An Empirical Analysis Using Vector Autoregression," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 397-417, June.
    12. Büttgen, Marion & al.,, 2021. "Blockchain in Service Management and Service Research - Developing a Research Agenda and Managerial Implications," SMR - Journal of Service Management Research, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 5(2), pages 71-102.
    13. Nelson, Matthew L. & Shaw, Michael J., 2005. "Interorganizational System Standards Diffusion: The Role of Industry-Based Standards Development Organizations," Working Papers 05-0126, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    14. Corey M. Angst & Ritu Agarwal & V. Sambamurthy & Ken Kelley, 2010. "Social Contagion and Information Technology Diffusion: The Adoption of Electronic Medical Records in U.S. Hospitals," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(8), pages 1219-1241, August.
    15. Rajiv D. Banker & Robert J. Kauffman, 2004. "50th Anniversary Article: The Evolution of Research on Information Systems: A Fiftieth-Year Survey of the Literature in Management Science," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(3), pages 281-298, March.
    16. Kauremaa, Jouni & Nurmilaakso, Juha-Miikka & Tanskanen, Kari, 2010. "E-business enabled operational linkages: The role of RosettaNet in integrating the telecommunications supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(2), pages 343-357, October.
    17. Abhay Nath Mishra & Ritu Agarwal, 2010. "Technological Frames, Organizational Capabilities, and IT Use: An Empirical Investigation of Electronic Procurement," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(2), pages 249-270, June.
    18. Chris Forman, 2005. "The Corporate Digital Divide: Determinants of Internet Adoption," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(4), pages 641-654, April.
    19. YoungKi Park & Paul A. Pavlou & Nilesh Saraf, 2020. "Configurations for Achieving Organizational Ambidexterity with Digitization," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 1376-1397, December.
    20. Premkumar, G. & Roberts, Margaret, 1999. "Adoption of new information technologies in rural small businesses," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 467-484, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:19:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s10796-015-9616-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.