IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/grdene/v32y2023i6d10.1007_s10726-023-09847-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Choice of Knowledge Collaboration Strategy of Knowledge Chain Members

Author

Listed:
  • Yan Zhou

    (South China University of Technology)

  • Xing Zhang

    (Zhengzhou University of Light Industry)

  • Yaya Fan

    (South China University of Technology)

Abstract

Taking knowledge-advantage firms as masters and knowledge-disadvantage firms as apprentices in the knowledge chain, we construct a game model of knowledge collaboration strategy to explore how the knowledge potential difference affects the strategic choices of member firms. The theoretical results are verified by the case studies of HLT and KEDA and the simulation examples of the model. The research results show three points. First, the master may not be unemployed after sharing knowledge with the apprentice. Second, the master's optimal collaboration strategy is to actively share his own knowledge, while the apprentice's strategy is to absorb the knowledge of the master's knowledge under the influence of incentive and subsidy measures. Finally, the knowledge collaboration benefit of the knowledge chain can reach the Pareto optimum if the benefit distribution coefficient of the knowledge collaboration is controlled within a reasonable range. Specific countermeasures are proposed to help balance the distribution of knowledge collaboration benefits between the master and the apprentice.

Suggested Citation

  • Yan Zhou & Xing Zhang & Yaya Fan, 2023. "Choice of Knowledge Collaboration Strategy of Knowledge Chain Members," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 32(6), pages 1391-1413, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:32:y:2023:i:6:d:10.1007_s10726-023-09847-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10726-023-09847-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10726-023-09847-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10726-023-09847-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ilona Ilvonen & Stefan Thalmann & Markus Manhart & Christian Sillaber, 2018. "Reconciling digital transformation and knowledge protection: a research agenda," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 235-244, April.
    2. Nasr, Eman S. & Kilgour, Marc D. & Noori, Hamid, 2015. "Strategizing niceness in co-opetition: The case of knowledge exchange in supply chain innovation projects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(3), pages 845-854.
    3. Wu, Jianfeng & Shanley, Mark T., 2009. "Knowledge stock, exploration, and innovation: Research on the United States electromedical device industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(4), pages 474-483, April.
    4. Luyun Xu & Jian Li & Xin Zhou, 2019. "Exploring new knowledge through research collaboration: the moderation of the global and local cohesion of knowledge networks," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 822-849, June.
    5. Gavious, Arieh & Rabinowitz, Gad, 2003. "Optimal knowledge outsourcing model," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 451-457, December.
    6. Shujahat, Muhammad & Sousa, Maria José & Hussain, Saddam & Nawaz, Faisal & Wang, Minhong & Umer, Muhammad, 2019. "Translating the impact of knowledge management processes into knowledge-based innovation: The neglected and mediating role of knowledge-worker productivity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 442-450.
    7. Anupama Phene & Stephen Tallman, 2014. "Knowledge Spillovers and Alliance Formation," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(7), pages 1058-1090, November.
    8. Perri, Alessandra & Andersson, Ulf, 2014. "Knowledge outflows from foreign subsidiaries and the tension between knowledge creation and knowledge protection: Evidence from the semiconductor industry," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 63-75.
    9. Aamir Rafique Hashmi, 2013. "Competition and Innovation: The Inverted-U Relationship Revisited," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 95(5), pages 1653-1668, December.
    10. Lindahl, Therese, 2012. "Coordination problems and resource collapse in the commons — Exploring the role of knowledge heterogeneity," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 52-59.
    11. Johanna Gast & Katherine Gundolf & Rainer Harms & Elvin Matos Collado, 2019. "Knowledge management and coopetition: How do cooperating competitors balance the needs to share and protect their knowledge?," Post-Print hal-02943192, HAL.
    12. Dovev Lavie & Pamela R. Haunschild & Poonam Khanna, 2012. "Organizational differences, relational mechanisms, and alliance performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(13), pages 1453-1479, December.
    13. Jie Wu & Xiaoyun Chen, 2012. "Leaders’ social ties, knowledge acquisition capability and firm competitive advantage," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 331-350, June.
    14. Birinder Singh Sandhawalia & Darren Dalcher, 2015. "Dynamic Knowledge Support Model for Decision-Making and Sustainable Growth: An Empirical Study," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 803-823, September.
    15. Birgul Arslan, 2018. "The interplay of competitive and cooperative behavior and differential benefits in alliances," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(12), pages 3222-3246, December.
    16. Mark Addis, 2016. "Tacit and explicit knowledge in construction management," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(7-8), pages 439-445, August.
    17. Giorgio Zanarone & Desmond (Ho-Fu) Lo & Tammy L. Madsen, 2016. "The double-edged effect of knowledge acquisition: How contracts safeguard pre-existing resources," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(10), pages 2104-2120, October.
    18. Norman, Patricia M., 2001. "Are your secrets safe? Knowledge protection in strategic alliances," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 44(6), pages 51-60.
    19. Tseng, Shu-Mei, 2009. "A study on customer, supplier, and competitor knowledge using the knowledge chain model," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 488-496.
    20. Minbaeva, Dana B., 2008. "HRM practices affecting extrinsic and intrinsic motivation of knowledge receivers and their effect on intra-MNC knowledge transfer," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 17(6), pages 703-713, December.
    21. Yu, Xinning & Lan, Yanfei & Zhao, Ruiqing, 2018. "Cooperation royalty contract design in research and development alliances: Help vs. knowledge-sharing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(2), pages 740-754.
    22. Domingo Ribeiro-Soriano & David Urbano, 2009. "Overview of Collaborative Entrepreneurship: An Integrated Approach Between Business Decisions and Negotiations," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 18(5), pages 419-430, September.
    23. Anupama Phene & Paul Almeida, 2008. "Innovation in multinational subsidiaries: The role of knowledge assimilation and subsidiary capabilities," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 39(5), pages 901-919, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zahoor, Nadia & Gabriel Pepple, Dennis & Choudrie, Jyoti, 2021. "Entrepreneurial competencies and alliance success: The role of external knowledge absorption and mutual trust," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 440-450.
    2. Feng Zhang & Guohua Jiang, 2019. "Combination of Complementary Technological Knowledge to Generate “Hard to Imitate” Technologies," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(02), pages 1-24, June.
    3. Scott-Kennel, Joanna & Saittakari, Iiris, 2020. "Sourcing or sharing in MNE networks? National headquarters and foreign subsidiaries as knowledge conduits in SMOPECs," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(1).
    4. Michailova, Snejina & Mustaffa, Zaidah, 2012. "Subsidiary knowledge flows in multinational corporations: Research accomplishments, gaps, and opportunities," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 383-396.
    5. Liangru Yu & Bo Yu, 2024. "Uncovering the impact of technology convergence on innovation quality: From the perspective of ego‐network dynamics pathway," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(6), pages 3641-3662, September.
    6. Ryan, Paul & Giblin, Majella & Andersson, Ulf & Clancy, Johanna, 2018. "Subsidiary knowledge creation in co-evolving contexts," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(5), pages 915-932.
    7. Thomas J. Hannigan & Alessandra Perri & Vittoria Giada Scalera, 2016. "The Dispersed Multinational: Does Connectedness Across Spatial Dimensions Lead to Broader Technological Search?," Working Papers 11, Venice School of Management - Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    8. Spanellis, Agnessa & MacBryde, Jillian & Dӧrfler, Viktor, 2021. "A dynamic model of knowledge management in innovative technology companies: A case from the energy sector," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(2), pages 784-797.
    9. Xu, Shichun & Hao, Andy, 2021. "Understanding the impact of national culture on firms’ benefit-seeking behaviors in international B2B relationships: A conceptual model and research propositions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 27-37.
    10. Chen, Yantai & Luo, Haibei & Chen, Jin & Guo, Yanlin, 2022. "Building data-driven dynamic capabilities to arrest knowledge hiding: A knowledge management perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1138-1154.
    11. Georgios Batsakis, 2016. "Host Location Knowledge Sourcing And Subsidiary Innovative Performance — Examining The Moderating Role Of Alternative Sources Of Knowledge And Ipr Distance," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(06), pages 1-28, August.
    12. Kenneth L. Bills & Christie Hayne & Sarah E. Stein & Richard C. Hatfield, 2021. "Collaborating with Competitors: How Do Small Firm Accounting Associations and Networks Successfully Manage Coopetitive Tensions?," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(1), pages 545-585, March.
    13. Dovev Lavie & Randi Lunnan & Binh Minh T. Truong, 2022. "How does a partner's acquisition affect the value of the firm's alliance with that partner?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(9), pages 1897-1926, September.
    14. Zahoor, Nadia & Al-Tabbaa, Omar, 2021. "Post-entry internationalization speed of SMEs: The role of relational mechanisms and foreign market knowledge," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(1).
    15. Hong, Jacky Fok Loi & Snell, Robin Stanley & Easterby-Smith, Mark, 2009. "Knowledge flow and boundary crossing at the periphery of a MNC," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(6), pages 539-554, December.
    16. Liliana Meza-González & Jaime Marie Sepulveda, 2019. "The impact of competition with China in the US market on innovation in Mexican manufacturing firms," Latin American Economic Review, Springer;Centro de Investigaciòn y Docencia Económica (CIDE), vol. 28(1), pages 1-21, December.
    17. Klis, Anna A. & Melstrom, Richard T., 2020. "Strategic behavior and dynamic externalities in commercial fisheries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    18. Aurelien Portuese, 2020. "Beyond antitrust populism: Towards robust antitrust," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 237-258, June.
    19. Su, Hsin-Ning & Moaniba, Igam M., 2017. "Investigating the dynamics of interdisciplinary evolution in technology developments," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 12-23.
    20. Steven Bond‐Smith, 2022. "Discretely innovating: The effect of limited market contestability on innovation and growth," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 69(3), pages 301-327, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:32:y:2023:i:6:d:10.1007_s10726-023-09847-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.