Axiomatization of the discrete Raiffa solution
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
DOI: 10.1007/s40505-014-0046-4
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
References listed on IDEAS
- Trockel, Walter, 2011. "An axiomatization of the sequential Raiffa solution," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 425, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
- Nash, John, 1953. "Two-Person Cooperative Games," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 21(1), pages 128-140, April.
- Kalai, Ehud, 1977.
"Proportional Solutions to Bargaining Situations: Interpersonal Utility Comparisons,"
Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 45(7), pages 1623-1630, October.
- Ehud Kalai, 1977. "Proportional Solutions to Bargaining Situations: Interpersonal Utility Comparisons," Discussion Papers 179, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
- Trockel, Walter, 2014.
"Robustness of intermediate agreements for the discrete Raiffa solution,"
Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 32-36.
- Walter Trockel, 2012. "Robustness of Intermediate Agreements for the Discrete Raiffa Solution," Working Papers 201202, Murat Sertel Center for Advanced Economic Studies, Istanbul Bilgi University.
- Trockel, Walter, 2014. "Robustness of intermediate agreements for the Discrete Raiffa solution," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 472, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
- Trockel, Walter, 2014. "Robustness of intermediate agreements for the Discrete Raiffa solution," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 496, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
- Salonen, Hannu, 1988. "Decomposable solutions for N -- person bargaining games," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 4(3), pages 333-347.
- Emily Tanimura & Sylvie Thoron, 2008. "A mechanism for solving bargaining problems between risk averse players," Working Papers halshs-00325695, HAL.
- Diskin, A. & Koppel, M. & Samet, D., 2011. "Generalized Raiffa solutions," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 452-458.
- Trockel, Walter, 2011.
"An exact non-cooperative support for the sequential Raiffa solution,"
Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 77-83, January.
- Trockel, Walter, 2011. "An exact non-cooperative support for the sequential Raiffa solution," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 426, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
- van Damme, E.E.C. & Peters, H., 1991.
"Characterizing the Nash and Raiffa bargaining solutions by disagreement point axioms,"
Other publications TiSEM
4bd5eb9e-328a-45a0-aa0a-e, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
- Peters, H. & van Damme, E.E.C., 1992. "Characterizing the Nash and Raiffa bargaining solutions by disagreement point axions," Other publications TiSEM e3289955-fbd0-4e43-a679-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
- Nash, John, 1950. "The Bargaining Problem," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 18(2), pages 155-162, April.
- Hans Peters & Eric Van Damme, 1991.
"Characterizing the Nash and Raiffa Bargaining Solutions by Disagreement Point Axioms,"
Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(3), pages 447-461, August.
- van Damme, E.E.C. & Peters, H., 1991. "Characterizing the Nash and Raiffa bargaining solutions by disagreement point axioms," Other publications TiSEM 4bd5eb9e-328a-45a0-aa0a-e, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
- Peters, H. & van Damme, E.E.C., 1992. "Characterizing the Nash and Raiffa bargaining solutions by disagreement point axions," Other publications TiSEM e3289955-fbd0-4e43-a679-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
- Anbarci, Nejat & Sun, Ching-jen, 2013. "Robustness of intermediate agreements and bargaining solutions," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 367-376.
- de Clippel, Geoffroy, 2007. "The procedural value for cooperative games with non-transferable utility," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 46-52, January.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Emily Tanimura & Sylvie Thoron, 2016.
"How Best to Disagree in Order to Agree?,"
International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(03), pages 1-17, September.
- Emily Tanimura & Sylvie Thoron, 2016. "How Best to Disagree in Order to Agree?," Post-Print hal-01303626, HAL.
- Emily Tanimura & Sylvie Thoron, 2016. "How Best to Disagree in Order to Agree?," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-01704885, HAL.
- Emily Tanimura & Sylvie Thoron, 2016. "How Best to Disagree in Order to Agree?," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-01303626, HAL.
- Emily Tanimura & Sylvie Thoron, 2016. "How Best to Disagree in Order to Agree?," Post-Print hal-01704885, HAL.
- M. Carmen Marco & Josep E. Peris & Begoña Subiza, 2020. "A Concessions-Based Procedure for Meta-Bargaining Problems," Homo Oeconomicus: Journal of Behavioral and Institutional Economics, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 105-120, November.
- Saglam, Ismail, 2016. "An Alternative Characterization for Iterated Kalai-Smorodinsky-Nash Compromise," MPRA Paper 73564, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Ismail Saglam, 2017.
"Iterated Kalai–Smorodinsky–Nash compromise,"
Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 40(1), pages 335-349, November.
- Ismail Saglam, 2015. "Iterated Kalai-Smorodinsky-Nash Compromise," IPEK Working Papers 1508, Ipek University, Department of Economics, revised Sep 2015.
- Saglam, Ismail, 2016. "Iterated Kalai-Smorodinsky-Nash Compromise," MPRA Paper 70614, University Library of Munich, Germany.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Ephraim Zehavi & Amir Leshem, 2018. "On the Allocation of Multiple Divisible Assets to Players with Different Utilities," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 52(1), pages 253-274, June.
- Bram Driesen & Peter Eccles & Nora Wegner, 2017. "A non-cooperative foundation for the continuous Raiffa solution," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 46(4), pages 1115-1135, November.
- Haruo Imai & Hannu Salonen, 2012. "A characterization of a limit solution for finite horizon bargaining problems," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 41(3), pages 603-622, August.
- Emily Tanimura & Sylvie Thoron, 2016.
"How Best to Disagree in Order to Agree?,"
International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(03), pages 1-17, September.
- Emily Tanimura & Sylvie Thoron, 2016. "How Best to Disagree in Order to Agree?," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-01704885, HAL.
- Emily Tanimura & Sylvie Thoron, 2016. "How Best to Disagree in Order to Agree?," Post-Print hal-01704885, HAL.
- Emily Tanimura & Sylvie Thoron, 2016. "How Best to Disagree in Order to Agree?," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-01303626, HAL.
- Emily Tanimura & Sylvie Thoron, 2016. "How Best to Disagree in Order to Agree?," Post-Print hal-01303626, HAL.
- Shiran Rachmilevitch, 2021. "Step-by-step negotiations and utilitarianism," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 50(2), pages 433-445, June.
- Anbarci, Nejat & Sun, Ching-jen, 2013. "Robustness of intermediate agreements and bargaining solutions," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 367-376.
- Diskin, A. & Koppel, M. & Samet, D., 2011. "Generalized Raiffa solutions," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 452-458.
- Ismail Saglam, 2017.
"Iterated Kalai–Smorodinsky–Nash compromise,"
Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 40(1), pages 335-349, November.
- Ismail Saglam, 2015. "Iterated Kalai-Smorodinsky-Nash Compromise," IPEK Working Papers 1508, Ipek University, Department of Economics, revised Sep 2015.
- Saglam, Ismail, 2016. "Iterated Kalai-Smorodinsky-Nash Compromise," MPRA Paper 70614, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Trockel, Walter, 2014.
"Robustness of intermediate agreements for the discrete Raiffa solution,"
Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 32-36.
- Walter Trockel, 2012. "Robustness of Intermediate Agreements for the Discrete Raiffa Solution," Working Papers 201202, Murat Sertel Center for Advanced Economic Studies, Istanbul Bilgi University.
- Trockel, Walter, 2014. "Robustness of intermediate agreements for the Discrete Raiffa solution," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 472, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
- Trockel, Walter, 2014. "Robustness of intermediate agreements for the Discrete Raiffa solution," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 496, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
- Trockel, Walter, 2011.
"An exact non-cooperative support for the sequential Raiffa solution,"
Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 77-83, January.
- Trockel, Walter, 2011. "An exact non-cooperative support for the sequential Raiffa solution," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 426, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
- Youngsub Chun, 2021. "Axioms concerning uncertain disagreement points in 2-person bargaining problems," The Journal of Mechanism and Institution Design, Society for the Promotion of Mechanism and Institution Design, University of York, vol. 6(1), pages 37-58, December.
- Philip Grech & Oriol Tejada, 2018. "Divide the dollar and conquer more: sequential bargaining and risk aversion," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 47(4), pages 1261-1286, November.
- William Thomson, 2022. "On the axiomatic theory of bargaining: a survey of recent results," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 26(4), pages 491-542, December.
- Haruo Imai & Hannu Salonen, 2009. "Limit Solutions for Finite Horizon Bargaining Problems," Discussion Papers 51, Aboa Centre for Economics.
- Saglam, Ismail, 2016. "An Alternative Characterization for Iterated Kalai-Smorodinsky-Nash Compromise," MPRA Paper 73564, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Bas Dietzenbacher & Hans Peters, 2022.
"Characterizing NTU-bankruptcy rules using bargaining axioms,"
Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 318(2), pages 871-888, November.
- Dietzenbacher, Bas & Peters, Hans, 2018. "Characterizing NTU-bankruptcy rules using bargaining axioms," Research Memorandum 006, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
- Dietzenbacher, Bas & Peters, Hans, 2018. "Characterizing NTU-Bankruptcy Rules using Bargaining Axioms," Other publications TiSEM 19230a8e-2d4d-4d10-b795-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
- Dietzenbacher, Bas & Peters, Hans, 2018. "Characterizing NTU-Bankruptcy Rules using Bargaining Axioms," Discussion Paper 2018-005, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
- Ismail Saglam, 2014.
"A Simple Axiomatization Of The Egalitarian Solution,"
International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(04), pages 1-7.
- Saglam, Ismail, 2012. "A simple axiomatization of the egalitarian solution," MPRA Paper 36773, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Ismail Saglam, 2012. "A Simple Axiomatization of the Egalitarian Solution," Working Papers 1201, TOBB University of Economics and Technology, Department of Economics.
- Anocha Aribarg & Neeraj Arora & Moon Young Kang, 2010. "Predicting Joint Choice Using Individual Data," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(1), pages 139-157, 01-02.
- Lin Boldt & Neeraj Arora, 2017. "Dyadic Compromise Effect," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(3), pages 436-452, May.
- Dominik Karos & Nozomu Muto & Shiran Rachmilevitch, 2018. "A generalization of the Egalitarian and the Kalai–Smorodinsky bargaining solutions," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 47(4), pages 1169-1182, November.
More about this item
Keywords
Bargaining games; Raiffa solution; Nash solution; Axiomatization;All these keywords.
JEL classification:
- C71 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Cooperative Games
- C78 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Bargaining Theory; Matching Theory
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:etbull:v:3:y:2015:i:1:d:10.1007_s40505-014-0046-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.