IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v27y2025i2d10.1007_s10668-023-04073-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does it matter who spreads and to which farmers? The influence of video extension on Chinese farmers’ green control technology adoption behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Sanxia Du

    (Huazhong Agricultural University
    Hubei Rural Development Research Center
    International Joint Laboratory of Climate Change Response and Sustainable Agriculture)

  • Xiaofeng Luo

    (Huazhong Agricultural University
    International Joint Laboratory of Climate Change Response and Sustainable Agriculture)

  • Lin Tang

    (Wuhan Institute of Technology
    Hubei Rural Development Research Center)

  • Yanzhong Huang

    (Wuhan Institute of Technology
    Hubei Rural Development Research Center)

  • Aqian Yan

    (Huazhong Agricultural University
    Hubei Rural Development Research Center)

Abstract

Most of the existing researches focus on the role of video teaching in traditional technology extension in farmers’ technology adoption behavior. However, there is a lack of special exploration and heterogeneity analysis for video extension in the new media. This study analyses the impact of video extension on farmers’ green control technology (GCT) adoption based on questionnaire data of 761 households in Henan and Hubei provinces. By distinguishing between video senders and video receivers, we further explain the effect mechanism of video extension on farmers’ GCT adoption behavior. Our results indicate that, first, video extension can significantly promote the adoption of GCT by farmers. After solving the endogeneity problem and testing the robustness, the above conclusion is still valid. Second, heterogeneity analysis based on the perspective of video senders shows that farmers’ GCT adoption behavior is more likely affected by the video extension from government organizations compared with market organizations and informal organizations. Government video extension raises farmers’ media trust, which encourages farmers to adopt GCT. Third, heterogeneity analysis based on the perspective of video receivers shows that information utilization ability can positively regulate the positive impact of video extension on farmers’ GCT adoption. Specifically, the promotion effect of video extension on GCT is greater for farmers with stronger information utilization ability. This effect is also stronger on farmers with higher levels of education.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanxia Du & Xiaofeng Luo & Lin Tang & Yanzhong Huang & Aqian Yan, 2025. "Does it matter who spreads and to which farmers? The influence of video extension on Chinese farmers’ green control technology adoption behavior," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 4261-4283, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10668-023-04073-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-04073-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-023-04073-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-023-04073-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wanglin Ma & Hongyun Zheng, 2022. "Heterogeneous impacts of information technology adoption on pesticide and fertiliser expenditures: Evidence from wheat farmers in China," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 66(1), pages 72-92, January.
    2. Soul‐kifouly G. Midingoyi & Menale Kassie & Beatrice Muriithi & Gracious Diiro & Sunday Ekesi, 2019. "Do Farmers and the Environment Benefit from Adopting Integrated Pest Management Practices? Evidence from Kenya," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(2), pages 452-470, June.
    3. Wuepper, David & Roleff, Nikolaus & Finger, Robert, 2021. "Does it matter who advises farmers? Pest management choices with public and private extension," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    4. Githiomi, Caroline & Muriithi, Beatrice & Irungu, Patrick & Mwungu, Chris M. & Diiro, Gracious & Affognon, Hippolyte & Mburu, John & Ekesi, Sunday, 2019. "Economic analysis of spillover effects of an integrated pest management (IPM) strategy for suppression of mango fruit fly in Kenya," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 121-132.
    5. Hajivassiliou, Vassilis & McFadden, Daniel & Ruud, Paul, 1996. "Simulation of multivariate normal rectangle probabilities and their derivatives theoretical and computational results," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 72(1-2), pages 85-134.
    6. Naidu, Sirisha C., 2009. "Heterogeneity and Collective Management: Evidence from Common Forests in Himachal Pradesh, India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 676-686, March.
    7. Bjorn Van Campenhout & David J. Spielman & Els Lecoutere, 2021. "Information and Communication Technologies to Provide Agricultural Advice to Smallholder Farmers: Experimental Evidence from Uganda," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(1), pages 317-337, January.
    8. Vanessa Carrión Yaguana & Jeffrey Alwang & George Norton & Victor Barrera, 2016. "Does IPM Have Staying Power? Revisiting a Potato-producing Area Years After Formal Training Ended," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(2), pages 308-323, June.
    9. Tang, Lin & Luo, Xiaofeng, 2021. "Can agricultural insurance encourage farmers to apply biological pesticides? Evidence from rural China," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    10. Jenny C. Aker & Ishita Ghosh & Jenna Burrell, 2016. "The promise (and pitfalls) of ICT for agriculture initiatives," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 47(S1), pages 35-48, November.
    11. Xiaoli Fan & Miguel I. Gómez & Shady S. Atallah & Jon M. Conrad, 2020. "A Bayesian State‐Space Approach for Invasive Species Management: The Case of Spotted Wing Drosophila," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 102(4), pages 1227-1244, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wanglin Ma & Hongyun Zheng & Amaka Nnaji, 2023. "Cooperative membership and adoption of green pest control practices: Insights from rice farmers," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 67(3), pages 459-479, July.
    2. Cai, Yi & Sun, Yucheng & Qi, Wene & Yi, Famin, 2022. "Impact of smartphone use on production outsourcing: evidence from litchi farming in southern China," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 25(4), September.
    3. Xiaolong Sun & Jing Lyu & Candi Ge, 2022. "Knowledge and Farmers’ Adoption of Green Production Technologies: An Empirical Study on IPM Adoption Intention in Major Indica-Rice-Producing Areas in the Anhui Province of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-16, November.
    4. Nawab Khan & Ram L. Ray & Hazem S. Kassem & Farhat Ullah Khan & Muhammad Ihtisham & Shemei Zhang, 2022. "Does the Adoption of Mobile Internet Technology Promote Wheat Productivity? Evidence from Rural Farmers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, June.
    5. Campenhout, Bjorn Van, 2021. "ICTs to Address Information Inefficiencies in Food Supply Chains," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315054, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Min Liu & Pengfei Shi & Jinxia Wang & Huimin Wang & Jikun Huang, 2023. "Do farmers get a greater return from selling their agricultural products through e‐commerce?," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 1481-1508, August.
    7. Shengyang Sun & Chao Zhang & Ruifa Hu & Jian Liu, 2023. "Do Pesticide Retailers’ Recommendations Aggravate Pesticide Overuse? Evidence from Rural China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, June.
    8. Yi Cai & Wene Qi & Famin Yi, 2023. "Smartphone use and willingness to adopt digital pest and disease management: Evidence from litchi growers in rural China," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(1), pages 131-147, January.
    9. Justice A. Tambo & Mathews Matimelo, 2022. "An act of defiance? Measuring farmer deviation from personalised extension recommendations in Zambia," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(2), pages 396-413, June.
    10. Justice A. Tambo & Lenis Saweda O. Liverpool‐Tasie, 2024. "Are farm input subsidies a disincentive for integrated pest management adoption? Evidence from Zambia," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(2), pages 740-763, June.
    11. Danyang Li & Daizo Kojima & Laping Wu & Mitsuyoshi Ando, 2024. "Impact of rural households' digital ability on their production efficiency in China," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(1), pages 139-160, January.
    12. Hongyun Zheng & Wanglin Ma, 2023. "Smartphone-based information acquisition and wheat farm performance: insights from a doubly robust IPWRA estimator," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 633-658, June.
    13. Mwungu, Chris Miyinzi & Muriithi, Beatrice & Ngeno, Vincent & Affognon, Hippolyte & Githiomo, Caroline & Diiro, Gracious & Ekesi, Sunday, 2020. "Health and environmental effects of adopting an integrated fruit fly management strategy among mango farmers in Kenya," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 15(01), March.
    14. Sun, Shengyang & Zhang, Chao & Hu, Ruifa & Liu, Jian, 2023. "Do pesticide retailers’ recommendations aggravate pesticide overuse? Evidence from rural China," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 13(7), pages 1-1.
    15. Ruining Li & Yanli Yu, 2022. "Impacts of Green Production Behaviors on the Income Effect of Rice Farmers from the Perspective of Outsourcing Services: Evidence from the Rice Region in Northwest China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-27, October.
    16. Kelvin Mulungu & Zewdu Ayalew Abro & Wambui Beatrice Muriithi & Menale Kassie & Miachael Kidoido & Subramanian Sevgan & Samira Mohamed & Chrysantus Tanga & Fathiya Khamis, 2024. "One size does not fit all: Heterogeneous economic impact of integrated pest management practices for mango fruit flies in Kenya—a machine learning approach," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(1), pages 261-279, February.
    17. Campenhout, Bjorn Van, 2021. "ICTs to Address Information Inefficiencies in Food Supply Chains," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 313801, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    18. Robert Finger & David Wüpper & Chloe McCallum, 2023. "The (in)stability of farmer risk preferences," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(1), pages 155-167, February.
    19. Finger, Robert & Sok, Jaap & Ahovi, Emmanuel & Akter, Sharmin & Bremmer, Johan & Dachbrodt-Saaydeh, Silke & de Lauwere, Carolien & Kreft, Cordelia & Kudsk, Per & Lambarraa-Lehnhardt, Fatima & McCallum, 2024. "Towards sustainable crop protection in agriculture: A framework for research and policy," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    20. Xiuling Ding & Apurbo Sarkar & Lipeng Li & Hua Li & Qian Lu, 2022. "Effects of Market Incentives and Livelihood Dependence on Farmers’ Multi-Stage Pesticide Application Behavior—A Case Study of Four Provinces in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-19, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10668-023-04073-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.