IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/astaws/v1y2007i3p193-203.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Markteintritte, Marktaustritte und Produktivität Empirische Befunde zur Dynamik in der Industrie

Author

Listed:
  • Joachim Wagner

    ()

Abstract

Mit einem Paneldatensatz für sämtliche niedersächsischen Industriebetriebe der Jahre 1995 bis 2002 werden drei Hypothesen aus dem Modell von Hopenhayn (Econometrica 1992) getestet: (H1) Firmen, die in der Periode t aus dem Markt ausscheiden, waren in der Periode t-1 weniger produktiv als Firmen, die in t im Markt verbleiben. (H2) Firmen, die in der Periode t in den Markt eintreten, weisen eine geringere Produktivität auf als Firmen, die in der Periode t bereits im Markt aktiv sind. (H3) Firmen aus einer Gründungskohorte, die am Markt überleben, weisen zum Zeitpunkt der Gründung eine höhere Produktivität auf als Firmen, die bereits nach wenigen Jahren wieder ausscheiden. Jede Hypothese wird bestätigt. Ergebnisse aus Analysen mit anderen Daten stützen diese Befunde. Dies zeigt, dass Selektionseffekte, bei denen die produktivsten Betriebe überleben, die Dynamik von Industrien prägen. Wirtschaftspolitische Maßnahmen, die Markteintritte und Marktaustritte oder Reallokationsprozesse von Produktionsfaktoren zwischen bereits bestehenden Betrieben behindern, bremsen damit das Wachstum der Produktivität und so das Wirtschaftswachstum insgesamt. Sie sollten daher unterbleiben.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Joachim Wagner, 2007. "Markteintritte, Marktaustritte und Produktivität Empirische Befunde zur Dynamik in der Industrie," AStA Wirtschafts- und Sozialstatistisches Archiv, Springer;Deutsche Statistische Gesellschaft - German Statistical Society, vol. 1(3), pages 193-203, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:astaws:v:1:y:2007:i:3:p:193-203
    DOI: 10.1007/s11943-007-0020-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11943-007-0020-9
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joachim Wagner, 2005. "Zur Mikrostruktur der Investitionsdynamik in der Industrie. Analysen mit Betriebspaneldaten aus Niedersachsen (1995 – 2002)," Schmollers Jahrbuch : Journal of Applied Social Science Studies / Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, vol. 125(4), pages 475-488.
    2. Lucia Foster & John Haltiwanger & Chad Syverson, 2008. "Reallocation, Firm Turnover, and Efficiency: Selection on Productivity or Profitability?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 98(1), pages 394-425, March.
    3. Eric Bartelsman & Stefano Scarpetta & Fabiano Schivardi, 2005. "Comparative analysis of firm demographics and survival: evidence from micro-level sources in OECD countries," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press, vol. 14(3), pages 365-391, June.
    4. Richard Ericson & Ariel Pakes, 1995. "Markov-Perfect Industry Dynamics: A Framework for Empirical Work," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 62(1), pages 53-82.
    5. Delgado, Miguel A. & Farinas, Jose C. & Ruano, Sonia, 2002. "Firm productivity and export markets: a non-parametric approach," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 397-422, August.
    6. Mark Doms & Eric J. Bartelsman, 2000. "Understanding Productivity: Lessons from Longitudinal Microdata," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 38(3), pages 569-594, September.
    7. Jovanovic, Boyan, 1982. "Selection and the Evolution of Industry," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(3), pages 649-670, May.
    8. John T. Addison & Thorsten Schank & Claus Schnabel & Joachim Wagner, 2006. "Works Councils in the Production Process," Schmollers Jahrbuch : Journal of Applied Social Science Studies / Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, vol. 126(2), pages 251-283.
    9. Wagner, Joachim, 1994. "The Post-entry Performance of New Small Firms in German Manufacturing Industries," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(2), pages 141-154, June.
    10. James J. Heckman, 2001. "Micro Data, Heterogeneity, and the Evaluation of Public Policy: Nobel Lecture," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 109(4), pages 673-748, August.
    11. Sourafel Girma & Richard Kneller & Mauro Pisu, 2005. "Exports versus FDI: An Empirical Test," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 141(2), pages 193-218, July.
    12. Fariñas, Jose C. & Ruano, Sonia, 2005. "Firm productivity, heterogeneity, sunk costs and market selection," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 23(7-8), pages 505-534, September.
    13. Daniel S. Hamermesh, 2000. "The Craft of Labormetrics," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 53(3), pages 363-380, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lena Koller & Claus Schnabel & Joachim Wagner, 2007. "Schwellenwerte im Arbeitsrecht: Höhere Effizienz und Transparent durch Vereinheitlichung," Working Paper Series in Economics 40, University of Lüneburg, Institute of Economics.
    2. Jens Korunig, 2007. "Regulierung des Netzmonopolisten durch Verbot von Peak-load Pricing?," Working Paper Series in Economics 36, University of Lüneburg, Institute of Economics.
    3. Ingrid Ott & Christian Papilloud, 2006. "Converging institutions. Shaping the relationships between nanotechnologies, economy and society," Working Paper Series in Economics 32, University of Lüneburg, Institute of Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Markteintritte; Marktaustritte; Produktivität ; Entry; Exit; Productivity ;

    JEL classification:

    • L11 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Production, Pricing, and Market Structure; Size Distribution of Firms
    • L60 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:astaws:v:1:y:2007:i:3:p:193-203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla) or (Rebekah McClure). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.