IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v351y2025i2d10.1007_s10479-024-06460-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing for heterogeneity in data envelopment analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Saman Mohsenirad

    (Virginia Tech)

  • Konstantinos Triantis

    (Virginia Tech)

Abstract

This paper introduces a comprehensive framework for detecting and conceptualizing heterogeneity in data envelopment analysis (DEA), aligning with the microeconomic production theory. Despite DEA’s significant advantage in evaluating DMUs based on their efficiency without assuming a specific functional form of technology, it critically relies on the comparability of these units. We address the persistent issue in DEA modeling that stems from the assumption of homogeneity among DMUs, which is often untested. We propose a novel methodological approach that serves as a testing framework for heterogeneity, predicated on minimal assumptions about data randomness. This framework provides a means to examine the biases introduced by technological disparities among DMUs and offers an approach for practitioners to ensure the validity of DEA modeling across diverse technological settings. This approach not only uncovers biases from technological differences but also serves as a preliminary step to enhance methods like clustering, aiding practitioners in verifying DEA's applicability across varied technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Saman Mohsenirad & Konstantinos Triantis, 2025. "Testing for heterogeneity in data envelopment analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 351(2), pages 1537-1558, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:351:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-024-06460-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-024-06460-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-024-06460-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-024-06460-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:351:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-024-06460-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.